Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shaw Yi Chaw

dblp:64/3190 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction
0.122007
AURA: Enabling Subject Matter Experts to Construct Declarative Knowledge Bases from Science Textbooks · AAAI 2007
Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading
0.112007
Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned · AAAI 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question answering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Highly Resilient Systems for Cloud
abstract
Traditional methods for implementing highly resilient systems are costly; and their methods using specialized hardware and high-speed interconnects do not extend to cloud. We demonstrate an architecture that rethinks the traditional approach and uses cloud's agility to provision additional capability as failures occur. This architecture continues serving requests with the best possible response even as the primary service deteriorates and even fails completely. It offloads requests according to their need to access the primary service; first redirecting requests with less need to lower-grade secondary capability that is provisioned on-demand on the cloud in order to reserve primary capacity for requests that need it (e.g., first redirect web-browsing requests to a slightly out-of-date cached dataset, and reserve the primary, most-consistent data service for check-out requests). Our approach 1) triages access to the primary service based on request needs in times when it is overwhelmed, and 2) provisions on-demand cloud capability to offload and continue serving other requests as needed. The result is a highly resilient system architecture that scales via cloud.
Teresa Tung, Shaw Yi Chaw, Qing Xie 0003, Qian Zhu 0008
ICWS2
2009 A Scalable Problem-Solver for Large Knowledge-Bases
abstract
We describe a problem solver built to answer questions like those on advanced placement exams using knowledge bases authored by domain experts. The problem solver is designed to work independently of any particular knowledge base or domain. Given a question, the problem solver identifies those portions of the knowledge base that are relevant to the question. We found that simple heuristics for judging relevance significantly improved performance, with no drop in coverage.
Shaw Yi Chaw, Ken Barker 0002, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
ICTAI1
2007 Learning by Reading: A Prototype System, Performance Baseline and Lessons Learned
Ken Barker 0002, Bhalchandra Agashe, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Noah S. Friedland, Michael R. Glass, Jerry R. Hobbs, Eduard H. Hovy, David J. Israel, Doo Soon Kim, Rutu Mulkar-Mehta, Sourabh Patwardhan, Bruce W. Porter, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
AAAI3
2007 AURA: Enabling Subject Matter Experts to Construct Declarative Knowledge Bases from Science Textbooks
Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Shaw Yi Chaw, Peter Clark, Daniel Hansch, Bonnie E. John, Sunil Mishra, John Pacheco, Bruce W. Porter, Aaron Spaulding, Moritz Weiten
AAAI3
2007 Capturing and answering questions posed to a knowledge-based system
abstract
As part of the ongoing project, Project Halo, our goal is to build a system capable of answering questions posed by novice users to a formal knowledge base. In our current context, the knowledge base covers selected topics in physics, chemistry, and biology, and our question set consists of AP (advanced high-school) level examination questions. The task is challenging because the questions are linguistically complex and are often incomplete (assume unstated knowledge), and because the users do not have prior knowledge of the system's contents. Our solution involves two parts: a controlled language interface, in which users reformulate the original natural language questions in a simplified version of English, and a novel problem solver that can elaborate initially inadequate logical interpretations of a question by selecting relevant pieces of knowledge in the knowledge base. An evaluation of the work in 2006 showed that this approach is feasible and that complex, multisentence questions can be posed and answered, thus illustrating novel ways of dealing with the knowledge capture impedance between users and a formal knowledge base, while also revealing challenges that still remain.
Peter Clark, Shaw Yi Chaw, Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Philip Harrison, James Fan, Bonnie E. John, Bruce W. Porter, Aaron Spaulding, John A. Thompson, Peter Z. Yeh
K-CAP2
2007 Capturing a taxonomy of failures during automatic interpretation of questions posed in natural language
abstract
An important problem in artificial intelligence is capturing, from natural language, formal representationsallthat can be used by a reasoner to compute an answer. Many researchers have studied this problem by developing algorithms addressing specific phenomena in natural language interpretation, but few have studied (or cataloged) the types of failures associated with this problem. Knowledgeallof these failures can help researchers by providing a roadallmap of open research problems and help practitioners by providing a checklist of issues to address in order to build systems that can achieve good performance on this problem.allIn this paper, we present a study -- conducted in the context of the Halo Project -- cataloging the types of failures that occur when capturing knowledge from naturallanguage. We identified the categories of failures by examining a corpus of questions posed byallnaive usersallto a knowledge based question answering system and empirically demonstrated the generality of ourallcategorizations. We also describe available technologies that can address some of the failures we have identified.
Peter Z. Yeh, Shaw Yi Chaw, James Fan, Dan Tecuci
K-CAP2
2004 A Question-Answering System for AP Chemistry: Assessing KR&R Technologies
Ken Barker 0002, Vinay K. Chaudhri, Shaw Yi Chaw, Peter Clark, James Fan, David J. Israel, Sunil Mishra, Bruce W. Porter, Pedro Romero, Dan Tecuci, Peter Z. Yeh
KR3