Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vidhya Gurumoorthi
dblp:64/5546
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 88% Computational science and engineering · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2010 A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › computational proteomics
proteotypic peptide prediction |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2010 A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2008 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
quantum chemistry |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Poster reception - Component architectures for quantum chemistry: forging new capabilities and insights · SC 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2010 A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics · Bioinform. 2008 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies
multi-level parallelism |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Poster reception - Component architectures for quantum chemistry: forging new capabilities and insights · SC 2006 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Poster reception - Component architectures for quantum chemistry: forging new capabilities and insights · SC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.2common component architecture · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomicsabstractAbstract Motivation: The standard approach to identifying peptides based on accurate mass and elution time (AMT) compares profiles obtained from a high resolution mass spectrometer to a database of peptides previously identified from tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) studies. It would be advantageous, with respect to both accuracy and cost, to only search for those peptides that are detectable by MS (proteotypic). Results: We present a support vector machine (SVM) model that uses a simple descriptor space based on 35 properties of amino acid content, charge, hydrophilicity and polarity for the quantitative prediction of proteotypic peptides. Using three independently derived AMT databases (Shewanella oneidensis, Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia pestis) for training and validation within and across species, the SVM resulted in an average accuracy measure of ∼0.83 with an SD of <0.038. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these results are achievable with a small set of 13 variables and can achieve high proteome coverage. Availability: http://omics.pnl.gov/software/STEPP.php Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Bobbie-Jo M. Webb-Robertson, William R. Cannon, Christopher S. Oehmen, Anuj R. Shah, Vidhya Gurumoorthi, Mary S. Lipton, Katrina M. Waters |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2008 | A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomicsabstractMOTIVATION: The standard approach to identifying peptides based on accurate mass and elution time (AMT) compares profiles obtained from a high resolution mass spectrometer to a database of peptides previously identified from tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) studies. It would be advantageous, with respect to both accuracy and cost, to only search for those peptides that are detectable by MS (proteotypic). RESULTS: We present a support vector machine (SVM) model that uses a simple descriptor space based on 35 properties of amino acid content, charge, hydrophilicity and polarity for the quantitative prediction of proteotypic peptides. Using three independently derived AMT databases (Shewanella oneidensis, Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia pestis) for training and validation within and across species, the SVM resulted in an average accuracy measure of 0.8 with a SD of <0.025. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these results are achievable with a small set of 12 variables and can achieve high proteome coverage. AVAILABILITY: http://omics.pnl.gov/software/STEPP.php. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Bobbie-Jo M. Webb-Robertson, William R. Cannon, Christopher S. Oehmen, Anuj R. Shah, Vidhya Gurumoorthi, Mary S. Lipton, Katrina M. Waters |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2006 | Poster reception - Component architectures for quantum chemistry: forging new capabilities and insightsabstractWe review the use of the Common Component Architecture approach within the quantum chemistry domain to tackle the software engineering challenges which arise as advanced algorithms are adopted and growing numbers of software packages are integrated to study complex, coupled physical phenomena. The development of common interfaces has allowed the adoption of advanced optimization solvers and high-level interchangeability of quantum chemistry packages. Components have been created which manage multiple levels of parallelism, providing much more efficient usage of parallel machines. Early efforts towards low-level integration of chemistry packages are examined. The ability to share intermediate data expands the capabilities available to any one software package, thereby enabling the rapid development of advanced methods. New methods for the study of reactions involving heavy elements, which depend on our component environment, are highlighted. Joseph P. Kenny, Curtis L. Janssen, Ida M. B. Nielsen, Manojkumar Krishnan, Vidhya Gurumoorthi, Edward F. Valeev, Theresa L. Windus |
SC | 5 |