Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lei Zhang 0041
dblp:64/5666-41
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-1007-4834ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genotyping
genotype imputation |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov model · Bioinform. 2014 FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov model · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative studies of de novo assembly tools for next-generation sequencing technologies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
gene mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov model · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
next-generation sequencing |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative studies of de novo assembly tools for next-generation sequencing technologies · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
segmental hidden markov model · 0.2merge-and-recover algorithm · 0.2hidden markov model · 0.2sequence coverage · 0.1n50 · 0.1benchmark comparison · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov modelabstractMOTIVATION: Fast and accurate genotype imputation is necessary for facilitating gene-mapping studies, especially with the ever increasing numbers of both common and rare variants generated by high-throughput-sequencing experiments. However, most of the existing imputation approaches suffer from either inaccurate results or heavy computational demand. RESULTS: In this article, aiming to perform fast and accurate genotype-imputation analysis, we propose a novel, fast and yet accurate method to impute diploid genotypes. Specifically, we extend a hidden Markov model that is widely used to describe haplotype structures. But we model hidden states onto single reference haplotypes rather than onto pairs of haplotypes. Consequently the computational complexity is linear to size of reference haplotypes. We further develop an algorithm 'merge-and-recover (MAR)' to speed up the calculation. Working on compact representation of segmental reference haplotypes, the MAR algorithm always calculates an exact form of transition probabilities regardless of partition of segments. Both simulation studies and real-data analyses demonstrated that our proposed method was comparable to most of the existing popular methods in terms of imputation accuracy, but was much more efficient in terms of computation. The MAR algorithm can further speed up the calculation by several folds without loss of accuracy. The proposed method will be useful in large-scale imputation studies with a large number of reference subjects. AVAILABILITY: The implemented multi-threading software FISH is freely available for academic use at https://sites.google.com/site/lzhanghomepage/FISH. Lei Zhang 0041, Yu-Fang Pei, Xiaoying Fu, Yu-Ping Wang 0002, Hong-Wen Deng |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2014 | FISH: fast and accurate diploid genotype imputation via segmental hidden Markov modelabstractBioinformatics (2014) 30 (13), 1876–1883 The author would like to note an affiliation correction. The first affiliation address was mistakenly stated as ‘School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi, China’, while the correct one should be ‘Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Genomics, School of Public Health, Soochow University, Jiangsu, P. R. China’. Lei Zhang 0041, Yu-Fang Pei, Xiaoying Fu, Yu-Ping Wang 0002, Hong-Wen Deng |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Comparative studies of de novo assembly tools for next-generation sequencing technologiesabstractMOTIVATION: Several new de novo assembly tools have been developed recently to assemble short sequencing reads generated by next-generation sequencing platforms. However, the performance of these tools under various conditions has not been fully investigated, and sufficient information is not currently available for informed decisions to be made regarding the tool that would be most likely to produce the best performance under a specific set of conditions. RESULTS: We studied and compared the performance of commonly used de novo assembly tools specifically designed for next-generation sequencing data, including SSAKE, VCAKE, Euler-sr, Edena, Velvet, ABySS and SOAPdenovo. Tools were compared using several performance criteria, including N50 length, sequence coverage and assembly accuracy. Various properties of read data, including single-end/paired-end, sequence GC content, depth of coverage and base calling error rates, were investigated for their effects on the performance of different assembly tools. We also compared the computation time and memory usage of these seven tools. Based on the results of our comparison, the relative performance of individual tools are summarized and tentative guidelines for optimal selection of different assembly tools, under different conditions, are provided. Jian Li 0012, Hui Shen 0007, Lei Zhang 0041, Christopher J. Papasian, Hong-Wen Deng |
Bioinform. | 4 |