Thomas Ragg

dblp:64/5943 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
dead code elimination
0.012004
Using Machine Learning for Estimating the Defect Content After an Inspection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection
0.012004
Using Machine Learning for Estimating the Defect Content After an Inspection · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
sensory processing
0.011994
A Model for Chemosensory Reception · NIPS 1994
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
feedforward neural network
0.011994
A Model for Chemosensory Reception · NIPS 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear regression · 0.0neural network · 0.0cross-validation · 0.0reaction kinetics modeling · 0.0feedforward neural network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Using Machine Learning for Estimating the Defect Content After an Inspection
abstract
We view the problem of estimating the defect content of a document after an inspection as a machine learning problem: The goal is to learn from empirical data the relationship between certain observable features of an inspection (such as the total number of different defects detected) and the number of defects actually contained in the document. We show that some features can carry significant nonlinear information about the defect content. Therefore, we use a nonlinear regression technique, neural networks, to solve the learning problem. To select the best among all neural networks trained on a given data set, one usually reserves part of the data set for later cross-validation; in contrast, we use a technique which leaves the full data set for training. This is an advantage when the data set is small. We validate our approach on a known empirical inspection data set. For that benchmark, our novel approach clearly outperforms both linear regression and the current standard methods in software engineering for estimating the defect content, such as capture-recapture. The validation also shows that our machine learning approach can be successful even when the empirical inspection data set is small.
Frank Padberg, Thomas Ragg, Ralf Schoknecht
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
2003 The Smaller the Better: Comparison of Two Approaches for Sales Rate Prediction
Martin Lauer, Martin A. Riedmiller, Thomas Ragg, Walter Baum, Michael Wigbers
IDA3
2002 Applying Machine Learning to Solve an Estimation Problem in Software Inspections
Thomas Ragg, Frank Padberg, Ralf Schoknecht
ICANN1
2002 Bayesian learning for sales rate prediction for thousands of retailers
Thomas Ragg, Wolfram Menzel, Walter Baum, Michael Wigbers
Neurocomputing1
2001 Building Committees by Clustering Models Based on Pairwise Similarity Values
Thomas Ragg
ECML1
1997 Building High Performant Classifiers by Integrating Bayesian Learning, Mutual Information and Committee Techniques - A Case Study in Time Series Prediction
Thomas Ragg, Steffen Gutjahr
ICANN1
1994 A Model for Chemosensory Reception
abstract
A new model for chemosensory reception is presented. It models reacti(cid:173) ons between odor molecules and receptor proteins and the activation of second messenger by receptor proteins. The mathematical formulation of the reaction kinetics is transformed into an artificial neural network (ANN). The resulting feed-forward network provides a powerful means for parameter fitting by applying learning algorithms. The weights of the network corresponding to chemical parameters can be trained by presen(cid:173) ting experimental data. We demonstrate the simulation capabilities of the model with experimental data from honey bee chemosensory neurons. It can be shown that our model is sufficient to rebuild the observed data and that simpler models are not able to do this task.
Rainer Malaka, Thomas Ragg, Martin Hammer
NIPS2