Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wei Li 0317

dblp:64/6025-317 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-7246-3534ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 55% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% Representation and self-supervised learning · 15%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.622025
Visual Evidence Prompting Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
compositionality
1.012026
Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic Compositionality · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning
1.012026
Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic Compositionality · ACL (1) 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining
1.012026
Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic Compositionality · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.912025
Visual Evidence Prompting Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods
0.812024
Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
compositional reasoning
0.812024
Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212024
Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

masked modeling · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0prompting · 0.9composition attribution enhancement · 0.8Grad-CAM · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Cross-Modal Masked Compositional Concept Modeling for Enhancing Visio-Linguistic Compositionality
abstract
Contrastively trained vision-language models like CLIP, have made remarkable progress in learning joint image-text representations, but still face challenges in compositional understanding.They often exhibit a "bag-of-words" behavior-struggling to capture the object relations, attribute-object bindings, and word order dependencies.This limitation arises not only from the reliance on global, single-vector representations for optimization, but also from the insufficient exploitation and modeling of the rich compositional information inherently present in paired image text data.In this work, we propose MACCO (MAsked Compositional Concept MOdeling), a framework that masks compositional concepts in one modality and reconstructs them conditioned on the full contextual information from the other, enabling the model to capture and align cross-modal compositional structures more effectively.To facilitate this process, we introduce two auxiliary objectives that jointly align and regularize masked features both inter-modally and intramodally.Extensive experiments on five compositional benchmarks, along with in-depth analyses, demonstrate that our approach not only significantly enhances compositionality in VLMs but also improves their ability to capture syntactic structure and linguistic information.Additionally, the improved compositionality also benefits text-to-image generation and multimodal large language model.
Wei Li 0317, Zhen Huang 0007, Xinmei Tian 0001
ACL (1)1
2025 Visual Evidence Prompting Mitigates Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
abstract
Wei Li, Zhen Huang, Houqiang Li, Le Lu, Yang Lu, Xinmei Tian, Xu Shen, Jieping Ye. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Wei Li 0317, Zhen Huang 0007, Houqiang Li, Le Lu 0001, Xinmei Tian 0001, Xu Shen 0001, Jieping Ye
ACL (1)1
2024 Interpretable Composition Attribution Enhancement for Visio-linguistic Compositional Understanding
abstract
Contrastively trained vision-language models such as CLIP have achieved remarkable progress in vision and language representation learning.Despite the promising progress, their proficiency in compositional reasoning over attributes and relations (e.g., distinguishing between "the car is underneath the person" and "the person is underneath the car") remains notably inadequate.We investigate the cause for this deficient behavior is the composition attribution issue, where the attribution scores (e.g., attention scores or GradCAM scores) for relations (e.g., underneath) or attributes (e.g., red) in the text are substantially lower than those for object terms.In this work, we show such issue is mitigated via a novel framework called CAE (Composition Attribution Enhancement).This generic framework incorporates various interpretable attribution methods to encourage the model to pay greater attention to composition words denoting relationships and attributes within the text.Detailed analysis shows that our approach enables the models to adjust and rectify the attribution of the texts.Extensive experiments across seven benchmarks reveal that our framework significantly enhances the ability to discern intricate details and construct more sophisticated interpretations of combined visual and linguistic elements.
Wei Li 0317, Zhen Huang 0007, Xinmei Tian 0001, Le Lu 0001, Houqiang Li, Xu Shen 0001, Jieping Ye
EMNLP1