Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

W. Cheng

dblp:64/6147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 54% Operating systems · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › system software testing
kernel testing
0.011986
A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel · S&P 1986
Operating systems › system security
operating system security
0.011986
A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel · S&P 1986
Operating systems › system security › operating system security › secure operating system
security kernel
0.011986
A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel · S&P 1986
Software testing › non-functional testing
security testing
0.011986
A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel · S&P 1986
Software testing
test coverage
0.011986
A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel · S&P 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

white-box testing · 0.0control synthesis graphs · 0.0black-box testing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 A New Security Testing Method and Its Application to the Secure Xenix Kernel
abstract
A new security testing method is proposed that combines the advantages of both traditional "black box" (monolithic functional) testing and "white box" (functional-synthesis- based) testing. The new method allows significant coverage both for security model-based tests and for individual kernel-call tests. It eliminates redundant kernel test cases (1) by using a variant of control synthesis graphs, (2) by analyzing dependencies between descriptive kernel-call specifications, and (3) by exploiting access check separability. A higher degree of test assurance is achieved than that of other security testing methods because the new method helps eliminate cyclic dependencies among test programs for different kernel calls. The application of this method to the testing of the Secure Xenix* kernel is illustrated. The design and the implementation of Secure Xenix are presented in a companion paper.
Virgil D. Gligor, C. Sekar Chandersekaran, W. Cheng, Wen-Der Jiang, Abhai Johri, Gary L. Luckenbaugh, L. Edward Reich
S&P3