EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
An Ngo-The
dblp:64/6167
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Operating systems · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
release planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release Planning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009 |
Operating systems › resource management
resource allocation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release Planning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release Planning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release Planning · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-phased optimization · 0.2stakeholder satisfaction modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Optimized Resource Allocation for Software Release PlanningabstractRelease planning for incremental software development assigns features to releases such that technical, resource, risk and budget constraints are met. Planning of software releases and allocation of resources cannot be handled in isolation. A feature can be offered as part of a release only if all its necessary tasks are done before the given release date. We assume a given pool of human resources with different degrees of productivity to perform different types of tasks. To address the inherent difficulty of this process, we propose a two-phased optimization approach that combines the strength of two existing solution methods. The industrial applicability of the approach is primarily directed towards mature organizations having systematic development and measurement processes in place. The expected practical benefit of the planning method is to provide release plan solutions that achieve a better overall business value (e.g., expressed by the degree of stakeholder satisfaction) by better allocation of resources. Without ignoring the importance of the human expert in this process, the contributions of the paper are seen in making the overall process more objective and the resulting decisions more transparent. An Ngo-The, Günther Ruhe |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2008 | Optimized staffing for product releases and its application at Chartwell TechnologyabstractAbstract Release planning for incremental software development assigns features to releases such that technical, resource, risk and budget constraints are met. Each feature offers a piece of functionality. A feature can be offered as part of a release only if all its necessary tasks are done before the given release date. These tasks require different skills. Staffing for product releases as considered in this paper is the process of assigning human resources from a given pool of developers who might have varying levels of skill to perform different tasks. In addition to that, we consider time windows of absence of the developers. The primary goal of staffing is to provide product releases of best quality where quality means offering the most attractive features to customers in a timely manner. We call the problem STAFF‐PRO. The problem is known to be NP‐complete. Consequently, we have to be satisfied with solutions that are sufficiently good, but not necessarily optimal in the case of mid‐sized or large problems. Search‐based methods relying on meta‐heuristics have been proven to be successful in similar contexts. In this research, a focused search (FS) method is presented. This refers to a two‐phased solution approach where Phase 1 applies integer linear programming to a relaxed version of the full problem. Its solution is used as a starting point to perform FS in a reduced search space in Phase 2. The search itself is conducted by a genetic algorithm. It generates a solution that fulfills all the stated resource and scheduling constraints and is of a proven degree of optimality. We performed an empirical analysis of the proposed solution approach by comparing FS and unfocused search (UFS) (without Phase 1) for a series of 200 test examples. On average, FS performs about 15% better than UFS. The whole method was applied as an industrial case study performed at Chartwell Technology. The case study demonstrates that application of the FS method to STAFF‐PRO (i) allows a reduction in the time needed for generating acceptable staffing plans, (ii) generates plans of proven quality that are better than manual plans and (iii) supports the various types of re‐planning necessary for varying parameters, budgets and resource. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Puneet Kapur, An Ngo-The, Günther Ruhe |
J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract. | 2 |
| 2008 | A systematic approach for solving the wicked problem of software release planning
An Ngo-The, Günther Ruhe |
Soft Comput. | 1 |
| 2006 | Guest Editors' Introduction
An Ngo-The, Günther Ruhe |
Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. | 1 |
| 2005 | Fuzzy Structural Dependency Constraints in Software Release PlanningabstractIncremental software development is becoming an important tendency in software engineering. A software release is a collection of new and/or changed features that form a new product. Release planning for incremental software development assigns features to sequence of releases in the most beneficial way within the resources available. Release planning is a complex problem where most of the data available are usually uncertain. In this paper, we propose an approach that improves on existing methods for release planning by handling the uncertainty of data using fuzzy logic. We use fuzzy logic to model the uncertainty concerning the identification of structural dependency constraints between requirements. All the concepts and the complete approach are illustrated by a case study example An Ngo-The, Moshood Omolade Saliu |
FUZZ-IEEE | 1 |
| 2003 | Requirements Negotiation under Incompleteness and Uncertainty
An Ngo-The, Günther Ruhe |
SEKE | 1 |