Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Werner Albig

dblp:64/6952 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation
0.112005
Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › promoter analysis
promoter modeling
0.112005
Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

consensus modeling · 0.1computational promoter analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Promoter modeling: the case study of mammalian histone promoters
abstract
MOTIVATION: Histone proteins play important roles in chromosomal functions. They are significantly evolutionarily conserved across species, which suggests similarity in their transcription regulation. The abundance of experimental data on histone promoters provides an excellent background for the evaluation of computational methods. Our study addresses the issue of how well computational analysis can contribute to unveiling the biologically relevant content of promoter regions for a large number of mammalian histone genes taken across several species, and suggests the consensus promoter models of different histone groups. RESULTS: This is the first study to unveil the detailed promoter structures of all five mammalian histone groups and their subgroups. This is also the most comprehensive computational analysis of histone promoters performed to date. The most exciting fact is that the results correlate very well with the biologically known facts and experimental data. Our analysis convincingly demonstrates that computational approach can significantly contribute to elucidation of promoter content (identification of biologically relevant signals) complementing tedious wet-lab experiments. We believe that this type of analysis can be easily applied to other functional gene classes, thus providing a general framework for modelling promoter groups. These results also provide the basis to hunt for genes co-regulated with histone genes across mammalian genomes.
Rajesh Chowdhary, R. Ayesha Ali, Werner Albig, Detlef Doenecke, Vladimir B. Bajic
Bioinform.3