Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gareth O. Roberts
dblp:64/7021
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4894-2537ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 85% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
hub and authority |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the World Wide Web · WWW 2001 |
Information retrieval › web search
link analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the World Wide Web · WWW 2001 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the World Wide Web · WWW 2001 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the World Wide Web · WWW 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rényi differential privacy · 1.7girsanov's theorem · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 1.3divide-and-conquer · 1.3bayesian analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Differential Privacy Guarantees of Markov Chain Monte Carlo AlgorithmsabstractThis paper aims to provide differential privacy (DP) guarantees for Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. In a first part, we establish DP guarantees on samples output by MCMC algorithms as well as Monte Carlo estimators associated with these methods under assumptions on the convergence properties of the underlying Markov chain. In particular, our results highlight the critical condition of ensuring the target distribution is differentially private itself. In a second part, we specialise our analysis to the unadjusted Langevin algorithm and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics and establish guarantees on their (Rényi) DP. To this end, we develop a novel methodology based on Girsanov’s theorem combined with a perturbation trick to obtain bounds for an unbounded domain and in a non-convex setting. We establish: (i) uniform in $n$ privacy guarantees when the state of the chain after $n$ iterations is released, (ii) bounds on the privacy of the entire chain trajectory. These findings provide concrete guidelines for privacy-preserving MCMC. Andrea Bertazzi, Tim Johnston, Gareth O. Roberts, Alain Durmus |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer FusionabstractCombining several (sample approximations of) distributions, which we term sub-posteriors, into a single distribution proportional to their product, is a common challenge. Occurring, for instance, in distributed 'big data' problems, or when working under multi-party privacy constraints. Many existing approaches resort to approximating the individual sub-posteriors for practical necessity, then find either an analytical approximation or sample approximation of the resulting (product-pooled) posterior. The quality of the posterior approximation for these approaches is poor when the sub-posteriors fall out-with a narrow range of distributional form, such as being approximately Gaussian. Recently, a Fusion approach has been proposed which finds an exact Monte Carlo approximation of the posterior, circumventing the drawbacks of approximate approaches. Unfortunately, existing Fusion approaches have a number of computational limitations, particularly when unifying a large number of sub-posteriors. In this paper, we generalise the theory underpinning existing Fusion approaches, and embed the resulting methodology within a recursive divide-and-conquer sequential Monte Carlo paradigm. This ultimately leads to a competitive Fusion approach, which is robust to increasing numbers of sub-posteriors. Ryan S. Y. Chan, Murray Pollock, Adam M. Johansen, Gareth O. Roberts |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2005 | Link analysis ranking: algorithms, theory, and experimentsabstractThe explosive growth and the widespread accessibility of the Web has led to a surge of research activity in the area of information retrieval on the World Wide Web. The seminal papers of Kleinberg [1998, 1999] and Brin and Page [1998] introducedLink Analysis Ranking, where hyperlink structures are used to determine the relativeauthorityof a Web page and produce improved algorithms for the ranking of Web search results. In this article we work within the hubs and authorities framework defined by Kleinberg and we propose new families of algorithms. Two of the algorithms we propose use a Bayesian approach, as opposed to the usual algebraic and graph theoretic approaches. We also introduce a theoretical framework for the study of Link Analysis Ranking algorithms. The framework allows for the definition of specific properties of Link Analysis Ranking algorithms, as well as for comparing different algorithms. We study the properties of the algorithms that we define, and we provide an axiomatic characterization of the INDEGREE heuristic which ranks each node according to the number of incoming links. We conclude the article with an extensive experimental evaluation. We study the quality of the algorithms, and we examine how different structures in the graphs affect their performance. Allan Borodin, Gareth O. Roberts, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Panayiotis Tsaparas |
ACM Trans. Internet Techn. | 2 |
| 2001 | Finding authorities and hubs from link structures on the World Wide WebabstractRecently, ther have been a number of algorH#-9 prC osed for analyzing hyperDCC link str5#TDso as todeterCDthe best "authorODHUM for a given topic or quer . While such analysis is usually combined with content analysis, ther is a sense in which some algorUO-9 ar deemed to be"mor balanced" andother "mor focused". WeunderDe a compar --C e study of hyperDTD link analysisalgor-CDCO Guided by some experD#C tal quer5CD we prD ose somefor-C crC5O r for evaluating and comparTlink analysisalgor-CUH5 Keywords link analysis, websear hing, hubs, author-9TD5 SALSA, KleinberMU algor9T#5 thrCHHE-9 Bayesian 1. Allan Borodin, Gareth O. Roberts, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, Panayiotis Tsaparas |
WWW | 2 |