Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Sebastian Kelm

dblp:64/7069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-7146-9322ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
1.152021
Co-evolutionary distance predictions contain flexibility information · Bioinform. 2021
Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction · Bioinform. 2017
Environment specific substitution tables improve membrane protein alignment · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
inter-residue distance prediction
0.512021
Co-evolutionary distance predictions contain flexibility information · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis › protein flexibility
protein flexibility prediction
0.512021
Co-evolutionary distance predictions contain flexibility information · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
loop modeling
0.312017
Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.112011
Environment specific substitution tables improve membrane protein alignment · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
membrane protein
0.112010
MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
sequence-structure alignment
0.012011
Environment specific substitution tables improve membrane protein alignment · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.5co-evolution analysis · 0.5DMPfold · 0.5sequence-based prediction · 0.4knowledge-based fragment search · 0.3ab initio modeling · 0.3principal component analysis · 0.1environment-specific substitution tables · 0.1homology-based modeling · 0.1coarse-grained molecular dynamics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Co-evolutionary distance predictions contain flexibility information
abstract
MOTIVATION: Co-evolution analysis can be used to accurately predict residue-residue contacts from multiple sequence alignments. The introduction of machine-learning techniques has enabled substantial improvements in precision and a shift from predicting binary contacts to predict distances between pairs of residues. These developments have significantly improved the accuracy of de novo prediction of static protein structures. With AlphaFold2 lifting the accuracy of some predicted protein models close to experimental levels, structure prediction research will move on to other challenges. One of those areas is the prediction of more than one conformation of a protein. Here, we examine the potential of residue-residue distance predictions to be informative of protein flexibility rather than simply static structure. RESULTS: We used DMPfold to predict distance distributions for every residue pair in a set of proteins that showed both rigid and flexible behaviour. Residue pairs that were in contact in at least one reference structure were classified as rigid, flexible or neither. The predicted distance distribution of each residue pair was analysed for local maxima of probability indicating the most likely distance or distances between a pair of residues. We found that rigid residue pairs tended to have only a single local maximum in their predicted distance distributions while flexible residue pairs more often had multiple local maxima. These results suggest that the shape of predicted distance distributions contains information on the rigidity or flexibility of a protein and its constituent residues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Dominik Schwarz, Guy Georges, Sebastian Kelm, Jiye Shi, Anna Vangone, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.3
2020 Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends
abstract
Antibodies are proteins that recognize the molecular surfaces of potentially noxious molecules to mount an adaptive immune response or, in the case of autoimmune diseases, molecules that are part of healthy cells and tissues. Due to their binding versatility, antibodies are currently the largest class of biotherapeutics, with five monoclonal antibodies ranked in the top 10 blockbuster drugs. Computational advances in protein modelling and design can have a tangible impact on antibody-based therapeutic development. Antibody-specific computational protocols currently benefit from an increasing volume of data provided by next generation sequencing and application to related drug modalities based on traditional antibodies, such as nanobodies. Here we present a structured overview of available databases, methods and emerging trends in computational antibody analysis and contextualize them towards the engineering of candidate antibody therapeutics.
Richard A. Norman, Francesco Ambrosetti, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, Lucy J. Colwell, Sebastian Kelm, Konrad Krawczyk
Briefings Bioinform.5
2020 Structural diversity of B-cell receptor repertoires along the B-cell differentiation axis in humans and mice
abstract
Most current analysis tools for antibody next-generation sequencing data work with primary sequence descriptors, leaving accompanying structural information unharnessed. We have used novel rapid methods to structurally characterize the complementary-determining regions (CDRs) of more than 180 million human and mouse B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire sequences. These structurally annotated CDRs provide unprecedented insights into both the structural predetermination and dynamics of the adaptive immune response. We show that B-cell types can be distinguished based solely on these structural properties. Antigen-unexperienced BCR repertoires use the highest number and diversity of CDR structures and these patterns of naïve repertoire paratope usage are highly conserved across subjects. In contrast, more differentiated B-cells are more personalized in terms of CDR structure usage. Our results establish the CDR structure differences in BCR repertoires and have applications for many fields including immunodiagnostics, phage display library generation, and "humanness" assessment of BCR repertoires from transgenic animals. The software tool for structural annotation of BCR repertoires, SAAB+, is available at https://github.com/oxpig/saab_plus.
Aleksandr Kovaltsuk, Matthew I. J. Raybould, Wing Ki Wong, Claire Marks, Sebastian Kelm, James Snowden, Johannes Trück, Charlotte M. Deane
PLoS Comput. Biol.5
2019 SCALOP: sequence-based antibody canonical loop structure annotation
abstract
MOTIVATION: Canonical forms of the antibody complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) were first described in 1987 and have been redefined on multiple occasions since. The canonical forms are often used to approximate the antibody binding site shape as they can be predicted from sequence. A rapid predictor would facilitate the annotation of CDR structures in the large amounts of repertoire data now becoming available from next generation sequencing experiments. RESULTS: SCALOP annotates CDR canonical forms for antibody sequences, supported by an auto-updating database to capture the latest cluster information. Its accuracy is comparable to that of a standard structural predictor but it is 800 times faster. The auto-updating nature of SCALOP ensures that it always attains the best possible coverage. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SCALOP is available as a web application and for download under a GPLv3 license at opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/webapps/scalop. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Wing Ki Wong, Guy Georges, Francesca Ros, Sebastian Kelm, Alan P. Lewis, Bruck Taddese, Jinwoo Leem, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.4
2017 Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction
abstract
Motivation: Loops are often vital for protein function, however, their irregular structures make them difficult to model accurately. Current loop modelling algorithms can mostly be divided into two categories: knowledge-based, where databases of fragments are searched to find suitable conformations and ab initio, where conformations are generated computationally. Existing knowledge-based methods only use fragments that are the same length as the target, even though loops of slightly different lengths may adopt similar conformations. Here, we present a novel method, Sphinx, which combines ab initio techniques with the potential extra structural information contained within loops of a different length to improve structure prediction. Results: We show that Sphinx is able to generate high-accuracy predictions and decoy sets enriched with near-native loop conformations, performing better than the ab initio algorithm on which it is based. In addition, it is able to provide predictions for every target, unlike some knowledge-based methods. Sphinx can be used successfully for the difficult problem of antibody H3 prediction, outperforming RosettaAntibody, one of the leading H3-specific ab initio methods, both in accuracy and speed. Availability and Implementation: Sphinx is available at http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/webapps/sphinx. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Claire Marks, Jaroslaw Nowak, Stefan Klostermann, Guy Georges, James Dunbar, Jiye Shi, Sebastian Kelm, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.7
2011 Environment specific substitution tables improve membrane protein alignment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Membrane proteins are both abundant and important in cells, but the small number of solved structures restricts our understanding of them. Here we consider whether membrane proteins undergo different substitutions from their soluble counterparts and whether these can be used to improve membrane protein alignments, and therefore improve prediction of their structure. RESULTS: We construct substitution tables for different environments within membrane proteins. As data is scarce, we develop a general metric to assess the quality of these asymmetric tables. Membrane proteins show markedly different substitution preferences from soluble proteins. For example, substitution preferences in lipid tail-contacting parts of membrane proteins are found to be distinct from all environments in soluble proteins, including buried residues. A principal component analysis of the tables identifies the greatest variation in substitution preferences to be due to changes in hydrophobicity; the second largest variation relates to secondary structure. We demonstrate the use of our tables in pairwise sequence-to-structure alignments (also known as 'threading') of membrane proteins using the FUGUE alignment program. On average, in the 10-25% sequence identity range, alignments are improved by 28 correctly aligned residues compared with alignments made using FUGUE's default substitution tables. Our alignments also lead to improved structural models. AVAILABILITY: Substitution tables are available at: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/proteins/resources.
Jamie R. Hill, Sebastian Kelm, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.2
2010 MEDELLER: homology-based coordinate generation for membrane proteins
abstract
MOTIVATION: Membrane proteins (MPs) are important drug targets but knowledge of their exact structure is limited to relatively few examples. Existing homology-based structure prediction methods are designed for globular, water-soluble proteins. However, we are now beginning to have enough MP structures to justify the development of a homology-based approach specifically for them. RESULTS: We present a MP-specific homology-based coordinate generation method, MEDELLER, which is optimized to build highly reliable core models. The method outperforms the popular structure prediction programme Modeller on MPs. The comparison of the two methods was performed on 616 target-template pairs of MPs, which were classified into four test sets by their sequence identity. Across all targets, MEDELLER gave an average backbone root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 2.62 Å versus 3.16 Å for Modeller. On our 'easy' test set, MEDELLER achieves an average accuracy of 0.93 Å backbone RMSD versus 1.56 Å for Modeller. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://medeller.info; Implemented in Python, Bash and Perl CGI for use on Linux systems; Supplementary data are available at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/proteins/resources.
Sebastian Kelm, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.1
2009 iMembrane: homology-based membrane-insertion of proteins
abstract
Abstract Summary: iMembrane is a homology-based method, which predicts a membrane protein's position within a lipid bilayer. It projects the results of coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations onto any membrane protein structure or sequence provided by the user. iMembrane is simple to use and is currently the only computational method allowing the rapid prediction of a membrane protein's lipid bilayer insertion. Bilayer insertion data are essential in the accurate structural modelling of membrane proteins or the design of drugs that target them. Availability: http://imembrane.info. iMembrane is available under a non-commercial open-source licence, upon request. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online and at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/proteins/resources.
Sebastian Kelm, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.1