Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wagner Truppel
dblp:64/928
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 48% Data stream processing · 34% Indexing and storage engines · 18% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines › temporal indexing
time series indexing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Online Amnesic Approximation of Streaming Time Series · ICDE 2004 |
Data stream processing
streaming time series |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Clustering of Time Series Subsequences is Meaningless: Implications for Previous and Future Research · ICDM 2003 |
Data mining › clustering › sequence clustering
subsequence clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Clustering of Time Series Subsequences is Meaningless: Implications for Previous and Future Research · ICDM 2003 |
Data mining › clustering
time series clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Clustering of Time Series Subsequences is Meaningless: Implications for Previous and Future Research · ICDM 2003 |
Data mining › temporal data mining
time series mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Clustering of Time Series Subsequences is Meaningless: Implications for Previous and Future Research · ICDM 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online algorithm · 0.0amnesic function · 0.0sliding window · 0.0clustering · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Online Amnesic Approximation of Streaming Time SeriesabstractThe past decade has seen a wealth of research on time series representations, because the manipulation, storage, and indexing of large volumes of raw time series data is impractical. The vast majority of research has concentrated on representations that are calculated in batch mode and represent each value with approximately equal fidelity. However, the increasing deployment of mobile devices and real time sensors has brought home the need for representations that can be incrementally updated, and can approximate the data with fidelity proportional to its age. The latter property allows us to answer queries about the recent past with greater precision, since in many domains recent information is more useful than older information. We call such representations amnesic. While there has been previous work on amnesic representations, the class of amnesic functions possible was dictated by the representation itself. We introduce a novel representation of time series that can represent arbitrary, user-specified amnesic functions. For example, a meteorologist may decide that data that is twice as old can tolerate twice as much error, and thus, specify a linear amnesic function. In contrast, an econometrist might opt for an exponential amnesic function. We propose online algorithms for our representation, and discuss their properties. Finally, we perform an extensive empirical evaluation on 40 datasets, and show that our approach can efficiently maintain a high quality amnesic approximation. Themis Palpanas, Michail Vlachos, Eamonn J. Keogh, Dimitrios Gunopulos, Wagner Truppel |
ICDE | 5 |
| 2003 | Clustering of Time Series Subsequences is Meaningless: Implications for Previous and Future ResearchabstractTime series data is perhaps the most frequently encountered type of data examined by the data mining community. Clustering is perhaps the most frequently used data mining algorithm, being useful in it's own right as an exploratory technique, and also as a subroutine in more complex data mining algorithms such as rule discovery, indexing, summarization, anomaly detection, and classification. Given these two facts, it is hardly surprising that time series clustering has attracted much attention. The data to be clustered can be in one of two formats: many individual time series, or a single time series, from which individual time series are extracted with a sliding window. Given the recent explosion of interest in streaming data and online algorithms, the latter case has received much attention. We make an amazing claim. Clustering of streaming time series is completely meaningless. More concretely, clusters extracted from streaming time series are forced to obey a certain constraint that is pathologically unlikely to be satisfied by any dataset, and because of this, the clusters extracted by any clustering algorithm are essentially random. While this constraint can be intuitively demonstrated with a simple illustration and is simple to prove, it has never appeared in the literature. We can justify calling our claim surprising, since it invalidates the contribution of dozens of previously published papers. We will justify our claim with a theorem, illustrative examples, and a comprehensive set of experiments on reimplementations of previous work. Eamonn J. Keogh, Jessica Lin 0001, Wagner Truppel |
ICDM | 3 |