Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Krzysztof Czuba

dblp:65/156 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0001-5968-2227ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Information extraction and text analysis · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
query processing
0.112006
Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112006
Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval › search engines
semantic search
0.112006
Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR · SIGIR 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
answer verification
0.012002
A Machine-Learning Approach to Introspection in a Question Answering System · EMNLP 2002
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › epistemic reasoning
introspection
0.012002
A Machine-Learning Approach to Introspection in a Question Answering System · EMNLP 2002
Information retrieval
precision-oriented retrieval
0.012006
Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR · SIGIR 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
concept learning
0.012002
A Machine-Learning Approach to Introspection in a Question Answering System · EMNLP 2002
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.012002
A Machine-Learning Approach to Introspection in a Question Answering System · EMNLP 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic encoding · 0.1XML fragments · 0.1constraint satisfaction · 0.0feature engineering · 0.0classifier · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Semantic search via XML fragments: a high-precision approach to IR
abstract
In some IR applications, it is desirable to adopt a high precision search strategy to return a small set of documents that are highly focused and relevant to the user's information need. With these applications in mind, we investigate semantic search using the XML Fragments query language on text corpora automatically pre-processed to encode semantic information useful for retrieval. We identify three XML Fragment operations that can be applied to a query to conceptualize, restrict, or relate terms in the query. We demonstrate how these operations can be used to address four different query-time semantic needs: to specify target information type, to disambiguate keywords, to specify search term context, or to relate select terms in the query. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our semantic search technology through a series of experiments using the two applications in which we embed this technology and show that it yields significant improvement in precision in the search results.
Jennifer Chu-Carroll, John M. Prager, Krzysztof Czuba, David A. Ferrucci, Pablo Ariel Duboue
SIGIR3
2004 Question Answering Using Constraint Satisfaction: QA-By-Dossier-With-Contraints
abstract
QA-by-Dossier-with-Constraints is a new approach to Question Answering whereby candidate answers' confidences are adjusted by asking auxiliary questions whose answers constrain the original answers. These constraints emerge naturally from the domain of interest, and enable application of real-world knowledge to QA. We show that our approach significantly improves system performance (75% relative improvement in F-measure on select question types) and can create a "dossier" of information about the subject matter in the original question.
John M. Prager, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, Krzysztof Czuba
ACL3
2003 In Question Answering, Two Heads Are Better Than One
Jennifer Chu-Carroll, Krzysztof Czuba, John M. Prager, Abraham Ittycheriah
HLT-NAACL2
2002 A Machine-Learning Approach to Introspection in a Question Answering System
abstract
The ability to evaluate intermediate results in a Question Answering (QA) system, which we call introspection, is necessary in architectures based on planning or on processing loops. In particular, it is needed to determine if an earlier phase must be retried, or if the response "No Answer" must be offered. We look at an introspection task of performing a cursory evaluation of the search engine output in a QA system. We define this task as a concept-learning problem and evaluate two classifiers that use features based on score progression in the ranked list returned by the search engine and candidate answer types. Our experiments showed promising results, achieving 25% relative improvement over a majority class baseline on unseen data.
Krzysztof Czuba, John M. Prager, Jennifer Chu-Carroll
EMNLP1