Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Metzler

dblp:65/1576 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Wireless networking · 77% Internet of things and sensor networks · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 57% Embedded and real-time systems · 43%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking › medium access control
carrier sense multiple access
0.112006
Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking › medium access control › collision avoidance
CSMA/CA
0.112006
Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking › WLAN
IEEE 802.11
0.112006
Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.112006
Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking
WLAN
0.112006
Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach · INFOCOM 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › reliability
sensor network reliability
0.012004
Sensor networks in intel fabrication plants · SenSys 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

receiving-sensitivity adaptation · 0.1clear-channel-assessment adaptation · 0.1heterogeneous wireless networking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Adaptive CSMA for Scalable Network Capacity in High-Density WLAN: A Hardware Prototyping Approach
abstract
Abstract — Fast proliferation of 802.11 devices has led to the emergence of High-Density WLAN where 100s-1000s clients being serviced by 10s-100s of APs in a multi-cell environment. Scalable network capacity becomes a primary design challenge. In this paper, we investigate the impact of hidden/exposed terminal and the lack of capture effect on today’s 802.11 devices on network throughput. We argue that the CSMA/CA parameters in 802.11 MAC protocol need to be adaptive to the changing network topology, traffic and interference. We propose a combination of Receiving-Sensitivity adaptation to reduce stronger-last collision and a Clear-Channel-Assessment adaptation to balance the hidden/exposed terminal problems. We take a hardwarecentric approach to modify the 802.11 MAC protocol and prototype adaptation algorithms on Intel Centrino TM laptops. We demonstrate through testbed measurement that Receiving-Signal-Strength-Indicator and Packet-Error-Rate are effective are readily available metric on today’s 802.11 hardware for the two adaptation algorithms. Our results show that the adaptation algorithms are able to react to the changing network environment and quickly converge to the new value setting. Up to 300 % throughput increase has been observed with the adaptation algorithms.
Jing Zhu 0001, Benjamin Metzler, Xingang Guo, York Liu
INFOCOM2
2004 Sensor networks in intel fabrication plants
abstract
The deployment of large-scale sensor networks in industrial environments presents technical challenges in achieving ease of deployment, flexibility in operation, and overall commercial viability. Sensor deployments are characterized by non-uniform placement of nodes, intermittent node connectivity, and the aggregation and reliable transfer of a large amount of data as networks scale to larger and larger sizes. Operation challenges include efficiently utilizing battery powered nodes, dynamically selecting sample periods and equipment clusters of interest, integrating with existing sensing and analysis infrastructure and easily correlating faults identified by the sensor network back to key factory operations and equipment. Commercial aspects involve returning value to the organization with hardened network nodes and reliable network operation that easily justifies the sensor network deployment and operating costs. We will demonstrate a sensor network in the ultra-pure water facility of an Intel fabrication plant, including details on the fab vibration application, the hardware nodes, and the heterogeneous wireless network.
Jasmeet Chhabra, Nandakishore Kushalnagar, Benjamin Metzler, Allen Sampson
SenSys3