Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
T. Jeff Reynolds
dblp:65/167
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages › grammatical inference
automata learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Learning Deterministic Finite Automata with a Smart State Labeling Evolutionary Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005 |
Automata and formal languages › grammatical inference › automata learning
DFA learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Learning Deterministic Finite Automata with a Smart State Labeling Evolutionary Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005 |
Automata and formal languages › grammatical inference
regular language learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Learning Deterministic Finite Automata with a Smart State Labeling Evolutionary Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state labeling · 0.1evolutionary algorithm · 0.1evidence driven state merging · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Learning Finite-State Transducers: Evolution Versus Heuristic State MergingabstractFinite-state transducers (FSTs) are finite-state machines (FSMs) that map strings in a source domain into strings in a target domain. While there are many reports in the literature of evolving FSMs, there has been much less work on evolving FSTs. In particular, the fitness functions required for evolving FSTs are generally different from those used for FSMs. In this paper, three string distance-based fitness functions are evaluated, in order of increasing computational complexity: string equality, Hamming distance, and edit distance. The fitness-distance correlation (FDC) and evolutionary performance of each fitness function is analyzed when used within a random mutation hill-climber (RMHC). Edit distance has the strongest FDC and also provides the best evolutionary performance, in that it is more likely to find the target FST within a given number of fitness function evaluations. Edit distance is also the most expensive to compute, but in most cases this extra computation is more than justified by its performance. The RMHC was compared with the best known heuristic method for learning FSTs, the onward subsequential transducer inference algorithm (OSTIA). On noise-free data, the RMHC performs best on problems with sparse training sets and small target machines. The RMHC and OSTIA offer similar performance for large target machines and denser data sets. When noise-corrupted data is used for training, the RMHC still performs well, while OSTIA performs poorly given even small amounts of noise. The RMHC is also shown to outperform a genetic algorithm. Hence, for certain classes of FST induction problem, the RMHC presented in this paper offers the best performance of any known algorithm Simon M. Lucas, T. Jeff Reynolds |
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. | 2 |
| 2005 | Learning Deterministic Finite Automata with a Smart State Labeling Evolutionary AlgorithmabstractLearning a Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) from a training set of labeled strings is a hard task that has been much studied within the machine learning community. It is equivalent to learning a regular language by example and has applications in language modeling. In this paper, we describe a novel evolutionary method for learning DFA that evolves only the transition matrix and uses a simple deterministic procedure to optimally assign state labels. We compare its performance with the Evidence Driven State Merging (EDSM) algorithm, one of the most powerful known DFA learning algorithms. We present results on random DFA induction problems of varying target size and training set density. We also studythe effects of noisy training data on the evolutionary approach and on EDSM. On noise-free data, we find that our evolutionary method outperforms EDSM on small sparse data sets. In the case of noisy training data, we find that our evolutionary method consistently outperforms EDSM, as well as other significant methods submitted to two recent competitions. Simon M. Lucas, T. Jeff Reynolds |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2003 | Learning DFA: evolution versus evidence driven state mergingabstractLearning deterministic finite automata (DFA) is a hard task that has been much studied within machine learning and evolutionary computation research. This paper presents a new method for evolving DFAs, where only the transition matrix is evolved, and the state labels are chosen to optimize the fit between final states and training set labels. This new procedure reduces the size and in particular, the complexity, of the search space. We present results on the Tomita languages, and also on a set of random DFA induction problems of varying target size and training set density. The Tomita set results show that we can learn the languages with far fewer fitness evaluations than previous evolutionary methods. On the random DFA task we compare our methods with the evidence driven state merging (EDSM) algorithms, which is one of the most powerful known DFA learning algorithms. We show that our method outperforms EDSM when the target DFA is small (less than 32 states) and the training set is sparse. Simon M. Lucas, T. Jeff Reynolds |
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation | 2 |
| 2003 | Experiments in speech recognition using a modular MLP architecture for acoustic modelling
T. Jeff Reynolds, Christos Andrea Antoniou |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2000 | Acoustic modelling using modular/ensemble combinations of heterogeneous neural networks
Christos Andrea Antoniou, T. Jeff Reynolds |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2000 | Modular neural networks exploit multiple front-ends to improve speech recognition systemsabstractWe have been investigating the possible advantages of a modular/ensemble neural network for acoustic modelling. We report experiments with ensembles of networks trained on data provided by different front-end preprocessing methods. As for previous work we train a network ensemble for each individual phone and combine the outputs of the ensemble using a further trained network. The combined system provides significant improvements for phone recognition and classification on the TIMIT corpus. Our results are now better than the best context-independent systems in the literature and close to the best context-dependent systems. Christos Andrea Antoniou, T. Jeff Reynolds |
KES | 2 |
| 1998 | Initial speech recognition results using the multinet architecture
Ednaldo Brigante Pizzolato, T. Jeff Reynolds |
ICSLP | 2 |