Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emmanuelle Delor

dblp:65/1796 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 83% Software maintenance and evolution · 17%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
goal-oriented requirements engineering
0.011997
GRAIL/KAOS: An Environment for Goal-Driven Requirements Engineering · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
requirements engineering tools
0.011997
GRAIL/KAOS: An Environment for Goal-Driven Requirements Engineering · ICSE 1997
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.011988
Generic Lifecycle Support in the ALMA Environment · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

goal modeling · 0.0meta-environment generation · 0.0environment database · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Requirements Engineering with Grail/Kaos: Tell the Requirements, All the Requirements, and Nothing Else but the Requirement
abstract
Software engineering tools currently available on the market are focused on solution design rather than on problem description. So-called requirement engineering (RE) tools enable companies to manage their requirements only once they got them out. But poor requirements, even well managed, will cause projects to fail. The presentation shows how CEDITI engineers proceed to produce requirements documents with GRAIL, a tool designed by RE practitioners for RE practitioners to enable them to do real requirements engineering. The tool relies on KAOS, the goal-driven requirements methodology. KAOS (Dardenne et al., 1993) advocates for modelling problems in the same flavor as engineers build models to describe solutions but with an appropriate ontology and notation.
Robert Darimont, Emmanuelle Delor, Jean-Luc Roussel, André Rifaut
RE2
1997 GRAIL/KAOS: An Environment for Goal-Driven Requirements Engineering
abstract
No abstract available.
Robert Darimont, Emmanuelle Delor, Philippe Massonet, Axel van Lamsweerde
ICSE2
1997 GRAIL/KAOS: An Environment for Goal-Driven Requirements Analysis, Integration and Layout
abstract
The KAOS methodology provides a language, a method, and meta-level knowledge for goal-driven requirements elaboration. The language provides a rich ontology for capturing requirements in terms of goals, constraints, objects, actions, agents etc. Links between requirements are represented its well to capture refinements, conflicts, operationalizations, responsibility assignments, etc. The KAOS specification language is a multi-paradigm language with a two-level structure: an outer semantic net layer for declaring concepts, their attributes and links to other concepts, and an inner formal assertion layer for formally defining the concept. The latter combines a real-time temporal logic for the specification of goals, constraints, and objects, and standard pre-/postconditions for the specification of actions and their strengthening to ensure the constraints.
Robert Darimont, Emmanuelle Delor, Philippe Massonet, Axel van Lamsweerde
RE2
1988 Generic Lifecycle Support in the ALMA Environment
abstract
ALMA is an environment kernel supporting the elaboration, analysis, documentation, and maintenance of the various products developed during an entire software lifecycle. Its central component is an environment database in which properties about software objects and relations are collected. Two kinds of tools are provided: high-level tools and syntax-directed tools. A basic feature of the ALMA kernel is its genericity. Tools of the first kind are parameterized on software lifecycle models while tools of the second kind are parameterized on formalisms. Versions of specific models and formalisms are generated by a meta-environment, which also generates the environment database structure tailored to the desired lifecycle model. The database support meta-system and the instatiated database support systems it generates are emphasized, including the architectural design decisions made and the mechanisms introduced for achieving parameterization on lifecycle models.>
Axel van Lamsweerde, Bruno Delcourt, Emmanuelle Delor, Marie-Claire Schayes, Robert Champagne
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3