In 1974, Ralph Merkle proposed the first unclassified protocol for secure communications over insecure channels. When legitimate communicating parties are willing to spend an amount of computational effort proportional to some parameter N, an eavesdropper cannot break into their communication without spending a time proportional to $$N^2$$ , which is quadratically more than the legitimate effort. In a quantum world, however, Merkle’s protocol is immediately broken by Grover’s algorithm, but it is easily repaired if we are satisfied with a quantum protocol against which a quantum adversary needs to spend a time proportional to $$N^{3/2}$$ in order to break it. Can we do better? We give two new key establishment protocols in the spirit of Merkle’s. The first one, which requires the legitimate parties to have access to a quantum computer, resists any quantum adversary who is not willing to make an effort at least proportional to $$N^{5/3}$$ , except with vanishing probability. Our second protocol is purely classical, yet it requires any quantum adversary to work asymptotically harder than the legitimate parties, again except with vanishing probability. In either case, security is proved for a typical run of the protocols: the probabilities are taken over the random (or quantum) choices made by the legitimate participants in order to establish their key as well as over the random (or quantum) choices made by the adversary who is trying to be privy to it.

A non-local box is an abstract device into which Alice and Bob input bits $x$ and $y$ respectively and receive outputs $a$ and $b$ respectively, where $a,b$ are uniformly distributed and $a \oplus b = x \wedge y$. Such boxes have been central to the study of quantum or generalized non-locality as well as the simulation of non-signaling distributions. In this paper, we start by studying how many non-local boxes Alice and Bob need in order to compute a Boolean function $f$. We provide tight upper and lower bounds in terms of the communication complexity of the function both in the deterministic and randomized case. We show that non-local box complexity has interesting applications to classical cryptography, in particular to secure function evaluation, and study the question posed by Beimel and Malkin \cite{BM} of how many Oblivious Transfer calls Alice and Bob need in order to securely compute a function $f$. We show that this question is related to the non-local box complexity of the function and conclude by greatly improving their bounds. Finally, another consequence of our results is that traceless two-outcome measurements on maximally entangled states can be simulated with 3 \nlbs, while no finite bound was previously known.