Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tom Lippincott
dblp:65/3815 · also Thomas Lippincott
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 82% Graph learning · 10% Language models and text generation · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
social media text analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fluency detection on communication networks · EMNLP 2016 |
Web and social media mining › social media analysis
twitter analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Fluency detection on communication networks · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical acquisition
vocabulary expansion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary Expansion · ACL (1) 2014 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › surface realization
morphological generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary Expansion · ACL (1) 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic model · 0.5constraint-based inference · 0.5unsupervised learning · 0.2graphical model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Automatic Language Identification in Texts
Tom Lippincott |
Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2016 | Fluency detection on communication networksabstractWhen considering a social media corpus, we often have access to structural information about how messages are flowing between people or organizations.This information is particularly useful when the linguistic evidence is sparse, incomplete, or of dubious quality.In this paper we construct a simple model to leverage the structure of Twitter data to help determine the set of languages each user is fluent in.Our results demonstrate that imposing several intuitive constraints leads to improvements in performance and stability.We release the first annotated data set for exploring this task, and discuss how our approach may be extended to other applications. Tom Lippincott, Benjamin Van Durme |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2014 | Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary ExpansionabstractWe present a novel way of generating unseen words, which is useful for certain applications such as automatic speech recognition or optical character recognition in low-resource languages. We test our vocabulary generator on seven low-resource languages by measuring the decrease in out-of-vocabulary word rate on a held-out test set. The languages we study have very different morphological properties; we show how our results differ depending on the morphological complexity of the language. In our best result (on Assamese), our approach can predict 29% of the token-based out-of-vocabulary with a small amount of unlabeled training data. Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Tom Lippincott, Nizar Habash, Owen Rambow |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2013 | Approaches to verb subcategorization for biomedicineabstractInformation about verb subcategorization frames (SCFs) is important to many tasks in natural language processing (NLP) and, in turn, text mining. Biomedicine has a need for high-quality SCF lexicons to support the extraction of information from the biomedical literature, which helps biologists to take advantage of the latest biomedical knowledge despite the overwhelming growth of that literature. Unfortunately, techniques for creating such resources for biomedical text are relatively undeveloped compared to general language. This paper serves as an introduction to subcategorization and existing approaches to acquisition, and provides motivation for developing techniques that address issues particularly important to biomedical NLP. First, we give the traditional linguistic definition of subcategorization, along with several related concepts. Second, we describe approaches to learning SCF lexicons from large data sets for general and biomedical domains. Third, we consider the crucial issue of linguistic variation between biomedical fields (subdomain variation). We demonstrate significant variation among subdomains, and find the variation does not simply follow patterns of general lexical variation. Finally, we note several requirements for future research in biomedical SCF lexicon acquisition: a high-quality gold standard, investigation of different definitions of subcategorization, and minimally-supervised methods that can learn subdomain-specific lexical usage without the need for extensive manual work. Tom Lippincott, Laura Rimell, Karin Verspoor, Anna Korhonen |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 1 |
| 2013 | Acquisition and evaluation of verb subcategorization resources for biomedicine
Laura Rimell, Tom Lippincott, Karin Verspoor, Helen L. Johnson 0001, Anna Korhonen |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning Syntactic Verb Frames using Graphical Models
Tom Lippincott, Anna Korhonen, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | Exploring subdomain variation in biomedical languageabstractBACKGROUND: Applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to biomedical texts have generated significant interest in recent years. In this paper we identify and investigate the phenomenon of linguistic subdomain variation within the biomedical domain, i.e., the extent to which different subject areas of biomedicine are characterised by different linguistic behaviour. While variation at a coarser domain level such as between newswire and biomedical text is well-studied and known to affect the portability of NLP systems, we are the first to conduct an extensive investigation into more fine-grained levels of variation. RESULTS: Using the large OpenPMC text corpus, which spans the many subdomains of biomedicine, we investigate variation across a number of lexical, syntactic, semantic and discourse-related dimensions. These dimensions are chosen for their relevance to the performance of NLP systems. We use clustering techniques to analyse commonalities and distinctions among the subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: We find that while patterns of inter-subdomain variation differ somewhat from one feature set to another, robust clusters can be identified that correspond to intuitive distinctions such as that between clinical and laboratory subjects. In particular, subdomains relating to genetics and molecular biology, which are the most common sources of material for training and evaluating biomedical NLP tools, are not representative of all biomedical subdomains. We conclude that an awareness of subdomain variation is important when considering the practical use of language processing applications by biomedical researchers. Tom Lippincott, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anna Korhonen |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2010 | Exploring variation across biomedical subdomains
Tom Lippincott, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Lin Sun 0003, Anna Korhonen |
COLING | 1 |
| 2009 | Semantic Clustering for a Functional Text Classification Task
Tom Lippincott, Rebecca J. Passonneau |
CICLing | 1 |
| 2008 | Relation between Agreement Measures on Human Labeling and Machine Learning Performance: Results from an Art History Domain
Rebecca J. Passonneau, Tom Lippincott, Tae Yano, Judith L. Klavans |
LREC | 2 |