Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Lippincott

dblp:65/3815 · also Thomas Lippincott · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 82% Graph learning · 10% Language models and text generation · 8%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
social media text analysis
0.212016
Fluency detection on communication networks · EMNLP 2016
Web and social media mining › social media analysis
twitter analysis
0.212016
Fluency detection on communication networks · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical acquisition
vocabulary expansion
0.212014
Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary Expansion · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › surface realization
morphological generation
0.112014
Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary Expansion · ACL (1) 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic model · 0.5constraint-based inference · 0.5unsupervised learning · 0.2graphical model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Automatic Language Identification in Texts
Tom Lippincott
Comput. Linguistics1
2016 Fluency detection on communication networks
abstract
When considering a social media corpus, we often have access to structural information about how messages are flowing between people or organizations.This information is particularly useful when the linguistic evidence is sparse, incomplete, or of dubious quality.In this paper we construct a simple model to leverage the structure of Twitter data to help determine the set of languages each user is fluent in.Our results demonstrate that imposing several intuitive constraints leads to improvements in performance and stability.We release the first annotated data set for exploring this task, and discuss how our approach may be extended to other applications.
Tom Lippincott, Benjamin Van Durme
EMNLP1
2014 Unsupervised Morphology-Based Vocabulary Expansion
abstract
We present a novel way of generating unseen words, which is useful for certain applications such as automatic speech recognition or optical character recognition in low-resource languages. We test our vocabulary generator on seven low-resource languages by measuring the decrease in out-of-vocabulary word rate on a held-out test set. The languages we study have very different morphological properties; we show how our results differ depending on the morphological complexity of the language. In our best result (on Assamese), our approach can predict 29% of the token-based out-of-vocabulary with a small amount of unlabeled training data.
Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Tom Lippincott, Nizar Habash, Owen Rambow
ACL (1)2
2013 Approaches to verb subcategorization for biomedicine
abstract
Information about verb subcategorization frames (SCFs) is important to many tasks in natural language processing (NLP) and, in turn, text mining. Biomedicine has a need for high-quality SCF lexicons to support the extraction of information from the biomedical literature, which helps biologists to take advantage of the latest biomedical knowledge despite the overwhelming growth of that literature. Unfortunately, techniques for creating such resources for biomedical text are relatively undeveloped compared to general language. This paper serves as an introduction to subcategorization and existing approaches to acquisition, and provides motivation for developing techniques that address issues particularly important to biomedical NLP. First, we give the traditional linguistic definition of subcategorization, along with several related concepts. Second, we describe approaches to learning SCF lexicons from large data sets for general and biomedical domains. Third, we consider the crucial issue of linguistic variation between biomedical fields (subdomain variation). We demonstrate significant variation among subdomains, and find the variation does not simply follow patterns of general lexical variation. Finally, we note several requirements for future research in biomedical SCF lexicon acquisition: a high-quality gold standard, investigation of different definitions of subcategorization, and minimally-supervised methods that can learn subdomain-specific lexical usage without the need for extensive manual work.
Tom Lippincott, Laura Rimell, Karin Verspoor, Anna Korhonen
J. Biomed. Informatics1
2013 Acquisition and evaluation of verb subcategorization resources for biomedicine
Laura Rimell, Tom Lippincott, Karin Verspoor, Helen L. Johnson 0001, Anna Korhonen
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2012 Learning Syntactic Verb Frames using Graphical Models
Tom Lippincott, Anna Korhonen, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha
ACL (1)1
2011 Exploring subdomain variation in biomedical language
abstract
BACKGROUND: Applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to biomedical texts have generated significant interest in recent years. In this paper we identify and investigate the phenomenon of linguistic subdomain variation within the biomedical domain, i.e., the extent to which different subject areas of biomedicine are characterised by different linguistic behaviour. While variation at a coarser domain level such as between newswire and biomedical text is well-studied and known to affect the portability of NLP systems, we are the first to conduct an extensive investigation into more fine-grained levels of variation. RESULTS: Using the large OpenPMC text corpus, which spans the many subdomains of biomedicine, we investigate variation across a number of lexical, syntactic, semantic and discourse-related dimensions. These dimensions are chosen for their relevance to the performance of NLP systems. We use clustering techniques to analyse commonalities and distinctions among the subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: We find that while patterns of inter-subdomain variation differ somewhat from one feature set to another, robust clusters can be identified that correspond to intuitive distinctions such as that between clinical and laboratory subjects. In particular, subdomains relating to genetics and molecular biology, which are the most common sources of material for training and evaluating biomedical NLP tools, are not representative of all biomedical subdomains. We conclude that an awareness of subdomain variation is important when considering the practical use of language processing applications by biomedical researchers.
Tom Lippincott, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anna Korhonen
BMC Bioinform.1
2010 Exploring variation across biomedical subdomains
Tom Lippincott, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Lin Sun 0003, Anna Korhonen
COLING1
2009 Semantic Clustering for a Functional Text Classification Task
Tom Lippincott, Rebecca J. Passonneau
CICLing1
2008 Relation between Agreement Measures on Human Labeling and Machine Learning Performance: Results from an Art History Domain
Rebecca J. Passonneau, Tom Lippincott, Tae Yano, Judith L. Klavans
LREC2