Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sara Shanian

dblp:65/4128 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 48% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 25% Deep learning architectures and training · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.222011
A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011
From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009
Software testing
test maintenance
0.212014
Resilient user interface level tests · ASE 2014
Software testing
UI testing
0.212014
Resilient user interface level tests · ASE 2014
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.112011
A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
sample compression bounds
0.112011
A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
KL regularization
0.112009
From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.112009
From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.012009
From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.012009
From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample compression · 0.1PAC-Bayes · 0.1coordinate descent · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Resilient user interface level tests
abstract
About 60% of the software development cost for online applications is related to developing user interfaces commonly used by the end users to interact with those applications. Frequent small changes to user interfaces (UIs) however easily break about 70% of the test cases intended to mimic users' interactions. Fixing broken tests results in extra costs of maintenance while lessening the benefits of test automation. One of the biggest challenges in creating resilient UI level test cases is to identify and locate the elements of the UI in a way that small UI changes do not break the way in which an element was originally located.
Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian
ASE2
2013 Stratified sampling of execution traces: Execution phases serving as strata
Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, Luay Alawneh, Arya Shafiee
Sci. Comput. Program.2
2011 A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods
Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacoste, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian
ICML5
2011 The Concept of Stratified Sampling of Execution Traces
abstract
Execution traces can be overwhelmingly large. To reduce their size, sampling techniques, especially the ones based on random sampling, have been extensively used. Random sampling, however, may result in samples that are not representative of the original trace. We propose a trace sampling framework based on stratified sampling that not only reduces the size of a trace but also results in a sample that is representative of the original trace by ensuring that the desired characteristics of an execution are distributed similarly in both the sampled and the original trace.
Heidar Pirzadeh, Sara Shanian, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj, Ali Mehrabian
ICPC2
2010 Learning the set covering machine by bound minimization and margin-sparsity trade-off
François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah, Sara Shanian
Mach. Learn.4
2009 From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization
abstract
We show that convex KL-regularized objective functions are obtained from a PAC-Bayes risk bound when using convex loss functions for the stochastic Gibbs classifier that upper-bound the standard zero-one loss used for the weighted majority vote. By restricting ourselves to a class of posteriors, that we call quasi uniform, we propose a simple coordinate descent learning algorithm to minimize the proposed KL-regularized cost function. We show that standard ellp-regularized objective functions currently used, such as ridge regression and ellp-regularized boosting, are obtained from a relaxation of the KL divergence between the quasi uniform posterior and the uniform prior. We present numerical experiments where the proposed learning algorithm generally outperforms ridge regression and AdaBoost.
Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian
NIPS5