Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Wegmann

dblp:65/430 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded hardware platform
dual processor platform
0.412019
The dual processor platform architecture: demo abstract · IPSN 2019
Internet of things and sensor networks
networked embedded systems
0.112019
The dual processor platform architecture: demo abstract · IPSN 2019
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.112019
The dual processor platform architecture: demo abstract · IPSN 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hardware partitioning · 0.8asynchronous message passing · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 The dual processor platform architecture: demo abstract
abstract
The Dual Processor Platform (DPP) is a novel architecture template for networked embedded systems based on a strictly asynchronous processor interconnect that allows to minimize interference with a proven predictable behavior [7]. Contrary to traditional platforms [1, 5] DPP tries to mitigate interference by isolating different tasks and mapping them onto dedicated hardware resources. Typically, two different task sets - (i) sensing/actuation/data processing and (ii) communication - are mapped onto two different physically separated processing elements (usually low-power microcontrollers), allowing each to be optimized according to their individual requirements. Such hardware partitioning is a standard approach, frequently found in more complex sensor system implementations [2]. While the communication processor handles wireless packet transmission and reception, the application processor is dedicated to the sensor data acquisition, processing and actuation. But this strict separation of resources and function also requires a processor interconnect: BOLT [7], a stateful processor interconnect specifically designed based on this paradigm allows a strict decoupling of the power, clock and time domains of the two processing elements by allowing only asynchronous message passing between the two. The strict limitation to an asynchronous interface allows for predictable run-time behavior that, in addition to typical behavior observed from experiments, has been formally verified [7]. The most notable advantages of this approach are:
Jan Beutel, Roman Trüb, Reto Da Forno, Markus Wegmann, Tonio Gsell, Romain Jacob, Michael Keller, Felix Sutton, Lothar Thiele
IPSN4