Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Limin Yao
dblp:65/5048
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-5245-8353ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 96% Language models and text generation · 4% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Web and social media mining · 38% Information retrieval · 20% Data mining · 16% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.4 | 3 | 2012 | Unsupervised Relation Discovery with Sense Disambiguation · ACL (1) 2012 Structured Relation Discovery using Generative Models · EMNLP 2011 Collective Cross-Document Relation Extraction Without Labelled Data · EMNLP 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
open relation extraction |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Unsupervised Relation Discovery with Sense Disambiguation · ACL (1) 2012 Structured Relation Discovery using Generative Models · EMNLP 2011 |
Web and social media mining › scholarly data mining
researcher profiling |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks · KDD 2008 Social Network Extraction of Academic Researchers · ICDM 2007 |
Web and social media mining
social network extraction |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Extraction and mining of an academic social network · WWW 2008 Social Network Extraction of Academic Researchers · ICDM 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Unsupervised Relation Discovery with Sense Disambiguation · ACL (1) 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › complex relation extraction
cross-document relation extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Collective Cross-Document Relation Extraction Without Labelled Data · EMNLP 2010 |
Data stream processing
document streams |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections · KDD 2009 |
Data mining › text mining › topic model
topic model inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections · KDD 2009 |
Information retrieval › search engines
expert finding |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Extraction and mining of an academic social network · WWW 2008 |
Information retrieval › text analysis
name disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networks · KDD 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking › entity disambiguation
author name disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Social Network Extraction of Academic Researchers · ICDM 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking
entity disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Social Network Extraction of Academic Researchers · ICDM 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
structured generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Structured Relation Discovery using Generative Models · EMNLP 2011 |
Data mining › clustering
unsupervised learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Collective Cross-Document Relation Extraction Without Labelled Data · EMNLP 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised relation discovery · 0.1probabilistic graphical model · 0.1conditional random field · 0.1generative modeling · 0.1variational inference · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1classification-based inference · 0.1SparseLDA · 0.1unified tagging · 0.1social network analysis · 0.1probabilistic framework · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Leveraging temporal validity of rules via LLMs for enhanced temporal knowledge graph reasoning
Qihong Pan, Limin Yao, Guojiang Shen, Xiao Han 0004, Yichuan Chen, Xiangjie Kong 0001 |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2013 | Relation Extraction with Matrix Factorization and Universal Schemas
Sebastian Riedel 0001, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, Benjamin M. Marlin |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2012 | Unsupervised Relation Discovery with Sense Disambiguation
Limin Yao, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Andrew McCallum |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2011 | Structured Relation Discovery using Generative Models
Limin Yao, Aria Haghighi, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Andrew McCallum |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Collective Cross-Document Relation Extraction Without Labelled Data
Limin Yao, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Andrew McCallum |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Constraint-Driven Rank-Based Learning for Information Extraction
Sameer Singh 0001, Limin Yao, Sebastian Riedel 0001, Andrew McCallum |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2010 | Modeling Relations and Their Mentions without Labeled Text
Sebastian Riedel 0001, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 2 |
| 2010 | A Combination Approach to Web User ProfilingabstractIn this article, we study the problem of Web user profiling, which is aimed at finding, extracting, and fusing the “semantic”-based user profile from the Web. Previously, Web user profiling was often undertaken by creating a list of keywords for the user, which is (sometimes even highly) insufficient for main applications. This article formalizes the profiling problem as several subtasks: profile extraction, profile integration, and user interest discovery. We propose a combination approach to deal with the profiling tasks. Specifically, we employ a classification model to identify relevant documents for a user from the Web and propose a Tree-Structured Conditional Random Fields (TCRF) to extract the profile information from the identified documents; we propose a unified probabilistic model to deal with the name ambiguity problem (several users with the same name) when integrating the profile information extracted from different sources; finally, we use a probabilistic topic model to model the extracted user profiles, and construct the user interest model. Experimental results on an online system show that the combination approach to different profiling tasks clearly outperforms several baseline methods. The extracted profiles have been applied to expert finding, an important application on the Web. Experiments show that the accuracy of expert finding can be improved (ranging from +6% to +26% in terms of MAP) by taking advantage of the profiles. Jie Tang 0001, Limin Yao, Duo Zhang 0001, Jing Zhang 0001 |
ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data | 2 |
| 2009 | Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collectionsabstractTopic models provide a powerful tool for analyzing large text collections by representing high dimensional data in a low dimensional subspace. Fitting a topic model given a set of training documents requires approximate inference techniques that are computationally expensive. With today's large-scale, constantly expanding document collections, it is useful to be able to infer topic distributions for new documents without retraining the model. In this paper, we empirically evaluate the performance of several methods for topic inference in previously unseen documents, including methods based on Gibbs sampling, variational inference, and a new method inspired by text classification. The classification-based inference method produces results similar to iterative inference methods, but requires only a single matrix multiplication. In addition to these inference methods, we present SparseLDA, an algorithm and data structure for evaluating Gibbs sampling distributions. Empirical results indicate that SparseLDA can be approximately 20 times faster than traditional LDA and provide twice the speedup of previously published fast sampling methods, while also using substantially less memory. Limin Yao, David M. Mimno, Andrew McCallum |
KDD | 1 |
| 2009 | Multi-topic Based Query-Oriented SummarizationabstractQuery-oriented summarization aims at extracting an informative summary from a document collection for a given query. It is very useful to help users grasp the main information related to a query. Existing work can be mainly classified into two categories: supervised method and unsupervised method. The former requires training examples, which makes the method limited to predefined domains. While the latter usually utilizes clustering algorithms to find ‘centered’ sentences as the summary. However, the method does not consider the query information, thus the summarization is general about the document collection itself. Moreover, most of existing work assumes that documents related to the query only talks about one topic. Unfortunately, statistics show that a large portion of summarization tasks talk about multiple topics. In this paper, we try to break limitations of the existing methods and study a new setup of the problem of multi-topic based query-oriented summarization. We propose using a probabilistic approach to solve this problem. More specifically, we propose two strategies to incorporate the query information into a probabilistic model. Experimental results on two different genres of data show that our proposed approach can effectively extract a multi-topic summary from a document collection and the summarization performance is better than baseline methods. The approach is quite general and can be applied to many other mining tasks, for example product opinion analysis and question answering. Jie Tang 0001, Limin Yao, Dewei Chen |
SDM | 2 |
| 2008 | ArnetMiner: extraction and mining of academic social networksabstractThis paper addresses several key issues in the ArnetMiner system, which aims at extracting and mining academic social networks. Specifically, the system focuses on: 1) Extracting researcher profiles automatically from the Web; 2) Integrating the publication data into the network from existing digital libraries; 3) Modeling the entire academic network; and 4) Providing search services for the academic network. So far, 448,470 researcher profiles have been extracted using a unified tagging approach. We integrate publications from online Web databases and propose a probabilistic framework to deal with the name ambiguity problem. Furthermore, we propose a unified modeling approach to simultaneously model topical aspects of papers, authors, and publication venues. Search services such as expertise search and people association search have been provided based on the modeling results. In this paper, we describe the architecture and main features of the system. We also present the empirical evaluation of the proposed methods. Jie Tang 0001, Jing Zhang 0001, Limin Yao, Juan-Zi Li, Li Zhang 0007, Zhong Su |
KDD | 3 |
| 2008 | Extraction and mining of an academic social networkabstractThis paper addresses several key issues in extraction and mining of an academic social network: 1) extraction of a researcher social network from the existing Web; 2) integration of the publications from existing digital libraries; 3) expertise search on a given topic; and 4) association search between researchers. We developed a social network system, called ArnetMiner, based on proposed methods to the above problems. In total, 448,470 researcher profiles and 981,599 publications were extracted/integrated after the system having been in operation for two years. The paper describes the architecture and main features of the system. It also briefly presents the experimental results of the proposed methods. Jie Tang 0001, Jing Zhang 0001, Limin Yao, Juan-Zi Li |
WWW | 3 |
| 2007 | Social Network Extraction of Academic ResearchersabstractThis paper addresses the issue of extraction of an academic researcher social network. By researcher social network extraction, we are aimed at finding, extracting, and fusing the 'semantic '-based profiling information of a researcher from the Web. Previously, social network extraction was often undertaken separately in an ad-hoc fashion. This paper first gives a formalization of the entire problem. Specifically, it identifies the 'relevant documents' from the Web by a classifier. It then proposes a unified approach to perform the researcher profiling using conditional random fields (CRF). It integrates publications from the existing bibliography datasets. In the integration, it proposes a constraints-based probabilistic model to name disambiguation. Experimental results on an online system show that the unified approach to researcher profiling significantly outperforms the baseline methods of using rule learning or classification. Experimental results also indicate that our method to name disambiguation performs better than the baseline method using unsupervised learning. The methods have been applied to expert finding. Experiments show that the accuracy of expert finding can be significantly improved by using the proposed methods. Jie Tang 0001, Duo Zhang 0001, Limin Yao |
ICDM | 3 |
| 2007 | A Unified Approach to Researcher ProfilingabstractThis paper addresses the issue of researcher profiling. By researcher profiling, we mean building a semantic profile for an academic researcher, by identifying and annotating information from the Web. Previously, person profile annotation was often undertaken separately in an ad-hoc fashion. This paper first gives a formalization of the entire problem and proposes a unified approach to perform the task using Conditional Random Fields (CRF). The paper shows that with introduction of a set of tags, most of the annotation tasks can be performed within this approach. Experiments show that significant improvements over the separated method can be obtained, because the subtasks of annotation are interdependent and should be performed together. The method has been applied to expert finding. Experimental results show that the performance of expert finding can be significantly improved by using the profiling method. Limin Yao, Jie Tang 0001, Juan-Zi Li |
Web Intelligence | 1 |