Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xinyu Tang 0003
dblp:65/5518-3
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-2258-9440ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
6 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 71% Security and privacy of machine learning · 29% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Optimization for machine learning · 22% Video understanding and tracking · 11% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
2.8 | 4 | 2024 | A New Linear Scaling Rule for Private Adaptive Hyperparameter Optimization · ICML 2024 Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation · ICLR 2024 Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecture · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy evaluation
privacy-utility tradeoff |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random Processes · NeurIPS 2023 Effectively Using Public Data in Privacy Preserving Machine Learning · ICML 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
language model privacy |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model privacy
training data memorization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A New Linear Scaling Rule for Private Adaptive Hyperparameter Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
privacy-preserving in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private deep learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A New Linear Scaling Rule for Private Adaptive Hyperparameter Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Effectively Using Public Data in Privacy Preserving Machine Learning · ICML 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private deep learning
DP-SGD |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video analytics › behavior analysis › human behavior analysis
social interaction understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding Human Gaze Communication by Spatio-Temporal Graph Reasoning · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › dynamic graph neural network
spatio-temporal graph neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding Human Gaze Communication by Spatio-Temporal Graph Reasoning · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecture · USENIX Security Symposium 2022 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
social interaction analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Understanding Human Gaze Communication by Spatio-Temporal Graph Reasoning · ICCV 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
DP-SGD · 3.5linear scaling rule · 1.5few-shot generation · 1.5differential privacy · 1.5random process priors · 1.3membership inference · 0.9canary insertion · 0.9transfer learning · 0.7synthetic data augmentation · 0.7model ensembling · 0.7gradient clipping · 0.7self-distillation · 0.6ensemble architecture · 0.6message passing · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Privacy Auditing of Large Language ModelsabstractCurrent techniques for privacy auditing of large language models (LLMs) have limited efficacy---they rely on basic approaches to generate canaries which leads to weak membership inference attacks that in turn give loose lower bounds on the empirical privacy leakage.
We develop canaries that are far more effective than those used in prior work under threat models that cover a range of realistic settings.
We demonstrate through extensive experiments on multiple families of fine-tuned LLMs that our approach sets a new standard for detection of privacy leakage. For measuring the memorization rate of non-privately trained LLMs, our designed canaries surpass prior approaches.
For example, on the Qwen2.5-0.5B model, our designed canaries achieve $49.6\%$ TPR at $1\%$ FPR, vastly surpassing the prior approach's $4.2\%$ TPR at $1\%$ FPR.
Our method can be used to provide a privacy audit of $\varepsilon \approx 1$ for a model trained with theoretical $\varepsilon$ of 4. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a privacy audit of LLM training has achieved nontrivial auditing success in the setting where the attacker cannot train shadow models, insert gradient canaries, or access the model at every iteration. Ashwinee Panda, Xinyu Tang 0003, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Prateek Mittal |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private Few-Shot GenerationabstractWe study the problem of in-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) on private datasets.
This scenario poses privacy risks, as LLMs may leak or regurgitate the private examples demonstrated in the prompt.
We propose a novel algorithm that generates synthetic few-shot demonstrations from the private dataset with formal differential privacy (DP) guarantees, and show empirically that it can achieve effective ICL.
We conduct extensive experiments on standard benchmarks and compare our algorithm with non-private ICL and zero-shot solutions.
Our results demonstrate that our algorithm can achieve competitive performance with strong privacy levels.
These results open up new possibilities for ICL with privacy protection for a broad range of applications. Xinyu Tang 0003, Richard Shin, Huseyin A. Inan, Andre Manoel, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Zinan Lin 0001, Sivakanth Gopi, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | A New Linear Scaling Rule for Private Adaptive Hyperparameter OptimizationabstractAn open problem in differentially private deep learning is hyperparameter optimization (HPO). DP-SGD introduces new hyperparameters and complicates existing ones, forcing researchers to painstakingly tune hyperparameters with hundreds of trials, which in turn makes it impossible to account for the privacy cost of HPO without destroying the utility. We propose an adaptive HPO method that uses cheap trials (in terms of privacy cost and runtime) to estimate optimal hyperparameters and scales them up. We obtain state-of-the-art performance on 22 benchmark tasks, across computer vision and natural language processing, across pretraining and finetuning, across architectures and a wide range of $\varepsilon \in [0.01,8.0]$, all while accounting for the privacy cost of HPO. Ashwinee Panda, Xinyu Tang 0003, Saeed Mahloujifar, Vikash Sehwag, Prateek Mittal |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Effectively Using Public Data in Privacy Preserving Machine LearningabstractDifferentially private (DP) machine learning techniques are notorious for their degradation of model utility (e.g., they degrade classification accuracy). A recent line of work has demonstrated that leveraging *public data* can improve the trade-off between privacy and utility when training models with DP guaranteed. In this work, we further explore the potential of using public data in DP models, showing that utility gains can in fact be significantly higher than what shown in prior works. Specifically, we introduce DOPE-SGD, a modified DP-SGD algorithm that leverages public data during its training. DOPE-SGD uses public data in two complementary ways: (1) it uses advance augmentation techniques that leverages public data to generate synthetic data that is effectively embedded in multiple steps of the training pipeline; (2) it uses a modified gradient clipping mechanism (which is a standard technique in DP training) to change the *origin* of gradient vectors using the information inferred from available public and synthetic data, therefore boosting utility. We also introduce a technique to ensemble intermediate DP models by leveraging the post processing property of differential privacy to further improve the accuracy of the predictions. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in improving the state-of-the-art in DP machine learning across multiple datasets, network architectures, and application domains. For instance, assuming access to $2,000$ public images, and for a privacy budget of $\varepsilon=2,\delta=10^{-5}$, our technique achieves an accuracy of $75.1\%$ on CIFAR10, significantly higher than $68.1\%$ achieved by the state of the art. Milad Nasr, Saeed Mahloujifar, Xinyu Tang 0003, Prateek Mittal, Amir Houmansadr |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from Random ProcessesabstractIn privacy-preserving machine learning, differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) performs worse than SGD due to per-sample gradient clipping and noise addition.
A recent focus in private learning research is improving the performance of DP-SGD on private data by incorporating priors that are learned on real-world public data.
In this work, we explore how we can improve the privacy-utility tradeoff of DP-SGD by learning priors from images generated by random processes and transferring these priors to private data.
We propose DP-RandP, a three-phase approach.
We attain new state-of-the-art accuracy when training from scratch on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, MedMNIST and ImageNet for a range of privacy budgets $\\varepsilon \\in [1, 8]$. In particular, we improve the previous best reported accuracy on CIFAR10 from $60.6 \\%$ to $72.3 \\%$ for $\\varepsilon=1$. Xinyu Tang 0003, Ashwinee Panda, Vikash Sehwag, Prateek Mittal |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Self-Distillation Through a Novel Ensemble Architecture
Xinyu Tang 0003, Saeed Mahloujifar, Virat Shejwalkar, Milad Nasr, Amir Houmansadr, Prateek Mittal |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2022 | Machine Learning with Differentially Private Labels: Mechanisms and FrameworksabstractLabel differential privacy is a relaxation of differential privacy for machine learning scenarios where the labels are the only sensitive information that needs to be protected in the training data. For example, imagine a survey from a participant in a university class about their vaccination status. Some attributes of the students are publicly available but their vaccination status is sensitive information and must remain private. Now if we want to train a model that predicts whether a student has received vaccination using only their public information, we can use label-DP. Recent works on label-DP use different ways of adding noise to the labels in order to obtain label-DP models. In this work, we present novel techniques for training models with label-DP guarantees by leveraging unsupervised learning and semi-supervised learning, enabling us to inject less noise while obtaining the same privacy, therefore achieving a better utility-privacy trade-off. We first introduce a framework that starts with an unsupervised classifier f0 and dataset D with noisy label set Y , reduces the noise in Y using f0 , and then trains a new model f using the less noisy dataset. Our noise reduction strategy uses the model f0 to remove the noisy labels that are incorrect with high probability. Then we use semi-supervised learning to train a model using the remaining labels. We instantiate this framework with multiple ways of obtaining the noisy labels and also the base classifier. As an alternative way to reduce the noise, we explore the effect of using unsupervised learning: we only add noise to a majority voting step for associating the learned clusters with a cluster label (as opposed to adding noise to individual labels); the reduced sensitivity enables us to add less noise. Our experiments show that these techniques can significantly outperform the prior works on label-DP. Xinyu Tang 0003, Milad Nasr, Saeed Mahloujifar, Virat Shejwalkar, Amir Houmansadr, Prateek Mittal |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 1 |
| 2019 | Understanding Human Gaze Communication by Spatio-Temporal Graph ReasoningabstractThis paper addresses a new problem of understanding human gaze communication in social videos from both atomic-level and event-level, which is significant for studying human social interactions. To tackle this novel and challenging problem, we contribute a large-scale video dataset, VACATION, which covers diverse daily social scenes and gaze communication behaviors with complete annotations of objects and human faces, human attention, and communication structures and labels in both atomic-level and event-level. Together with VACATION, we propose a spatio-temporal graph neural network to explicitly represent the diverse gaze interactions in the social scenes and to infer atomic-level gaze communication by message passing. We further propose an event network with encoder-decoder structure to predict the event-level gaze communication. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed model improves various baselines significantly in predicting the atomic-level and event-level gaze communications. Lifeng Fan, Wenguan Wang, Song-Chun Zhu, Xinyu Tang 0003, Siyuan Huang 0001 |
ICCV | 4 |