Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

A. Philip Dawid

dblp:65/5584 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7410-6882ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.011993
Sequential Model Criticism in Probabilistic Expert Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1993
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
model criticism
0.011993
Sequential Model Criticism in Probabilistic Expert Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1993
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic expert system
0.011993
Sequential Model Criticism in Probabilistic Expert Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1993
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › voting
scoring rules
0.011993
Sequential Model Criticism in Probabilistic Expert Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standardized scoring rules · 0.0simulation study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Probability and statistics: Foundations and history. Special Issue in honor of Glenn Shafer
John C. Aldrich, A. Philip Dawid, Thierry Denoeux, Prakash P. Shenoy, Vladimir Vovk
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2022 Glenn Shafer - A short biography
John C. Aldrich, A. Philip Dawid, Thierry Denoeux, Prakash P. Shenoy, Vladimir Vovk
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2008 Identifying Optimal Sequential Decisions
A. Philip Dawid, Vanessa Didelez
UAI1
2006 Direct and Indirect Effects of Sequential Treatments
Vanessa Didelez, A. Philip Dawid, Sara Geneletti
UAI2
2002 Game theory, maximum generalized entropy, minimum discrepancy, robust Bayes and Pythagoras
abstract
Suppose that, for purposes of inductive inference or choosing an optimal decision, we wish to select a single distribution P* to act as representative of a class /spl Gamma/ of such distributions. The maximum entropy principle ("MaxeEnt") (Jaynes 1989; Csiszar 1991) is widely applied for this purpose, but its rationale has often been controversial (Shimony 1985; Seidenfeld 1986). Here we emphasize and generalize a reinterpretation of the maximum entropy principle (Topsoe (1979); Walley (1991); Grunwald (1998)): that the distribution P* that maximizes the entropy over /spl Gamma/ also minimizes the worst-case expected logarithmic score (log loss). In the terminology of decision theory (Berger 1985), P* is a robust Bayes, or /spl Gamma/-minimax, act, when loss is measured by the log loss. This gives a decision-theoretic justification for maximum entropy.
Peter Grünwald, A. Philip Dawid
ITW2
1999 Discussion of the Papers by Rissanen and by Wallace and Dowe
abstract
It is 12 years since I opened the discussion at the Royal Statistical Society meeting at which Rissanen and Wallace and Freeman presented companion papers on topics not far removed from those under discussion now. In the interim our understanding of the relationship between statistical inference, coding theory and algorithmic complexity has developed somewhat, but I feel there are still gaps to bridge. Rather than comment in detail on the current papers, I propose to use this opportunity to attempt a review of the whole area of stochastic complexity, or MDL, from a personal perspective.
A. Philip Dawid
Comput. J.1
1994 Hybrid Propagation in Junction Trees
A. Philip Dawid, Uffe Kjærulff, Steffen L. Lauritzen
IPMU1
1993 Sequential Model Criticism in Probabilistic Expert Systems
abstract
Probabilistic expert systems based on Bayesian networks require initial specification of both qualitative graphical structure and quantitative conditional probability assessments. As (possibly incomplete) data accumulate on real cases, the parameters of the system may adapt, but it is also essential that the initial specifications be monitored with respect to their predictive performance. A range of monitors based on standardized scoring rules that are designed to detect both qualitative and quantitative departures from the specified model is presented. A simulation study demonstrates the efficacy of these monitors at uncovering such departures.>
Robert G. Cowell, A. Philip Dawid, David J. Spiegelhalter
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1991 A Bayesian expert system for the analysis of an adverse drug reaction
Robert G. Cowell, A. Philip Dawid, T. Hutchinson, David J. Spiegelhalter
Artif. Intell. Medicine2
1990 Independence properties of directed markov fields
abstract
Abstract We investigate directed Markov fields over finite graphs without positivity assumptions on the densities involved. A criterion for conditional independence of two groups of variables given a third is given and named as the directed, global Markov property. We give a simple proof of the fact that the directed, local Markov property and directed, global Markov property are equivalent and – in the case of absolute continuity w. r. t. a product measure – equivalent to the recursive factorization of densities. It is argued that our criterion is easy to use, it is sharper than that given by Kiiveri, Speed, and Carlin and equivalent to that of Pearl. It follows that our criterion cannot be sharpened.
Steffen L. Lauritzen, A. Philip Dawid, B. N. Larsen, Hanns-Georg Leimer
Networks2