Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Julia Gale

dblp:65/6688 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
software process maturity		 0.011991
A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity · ICSE 1991
Requirements engineering and software design
software process		 0.011991
A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity · ICSE 1991
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity
Watts S. Humphrey, David H. Kitson, Julia Gale
 ICSE3