Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher C. Vogt

dblp:65/6868 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 56% Database system architecture and tuning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning › database performance management
performance prediction
0.011998
Predicting the Performance of Linearly Combined IR Systems · SIGIR 1998
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
result fusion
0.011998
Predicting the Performance of Linearly Combined IR Systems · SIGIR 1998
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.011998
Predicting the Performance of Linearly Combined IR Systems · SIGIR 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear regression · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Verity at TREC-6: out-of-the-box and beyond
Jan O. Pedersen 0001, Craig Silverstein, Christopher C. Vogt
Inf. Process. Manag.3
1999 Fusion Via a Linear Combination of Scores
Christopher C. Vogt, Garrison W. Cottrell
Inf. Retr.1
1998 Predicting the Performance of Linearly Combined IR Systems
abstract
We introduce a new technique for analyzing combination models.The technique allows us to make qualitative conclusions about which IR systems should be combined.We achieve this by using a linear regression to accurately (T ' = 0.98) predict the performance of the combined system based on quantitative measurements of individual component systems taken from TREC5.When applied to a linear model (weighted sum of relevance scores), the technique supports several previously suggested hypotheses: one should maximize both the individual systems' performances and the overlap of relevant documents between systems, while minimizing the overlap of nonrelevant documents.It also suggests new conclusions: both systems should distribute scores similarly, but not rank relevant documents similarly.It furthermore suggests that the linear model is only able to exploit a fraction of the benefit possible from combination.The technique is general in nature and capable of pointing out the strengths and weaknesses of any given combination approach.l The Skimming Effect happens when "retrieval approaches that represent their collection items differently may retrieve different relevant items, so that a combination method that takes the topranked items from each of the retrieval approaches will push non-relevant items down in the ranking."l The Chorus Effect occurs "when several retrieval approaches suggest that an item is relevant to a query...this tends to be stronger evidence for relevance than a single approach doing so."l The Dark Horse Effect in which "a retrieval approach may produce unusually accurate (or inaccurate) estimates of relevance for at least some items, relative to the other retrieval approaches."
Christopher C. Vogt, Garrison W. Cottrell
SIGIR1