Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bruno Romeira
dblp:65/8124
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-1485-6665ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 50% Optical networks · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
optical communication |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical Communications · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Optical networks
optical interconnect |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical Communications · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rate equation analysis · 0.9purcell effect · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical CommunicationsabstractNanoscale light sources are being intensively investigated for their potential to enable low-energy, high-density optical communication and sensing systems. Both nanolight-emitting diodes (nanoLEDs) and nanolasers have been considered, based on advanced nanophotonic concepts such as photonic crystals and plasmonic structures, with dimensions well into the submicrometer domain. With decreasing dimensions, light-matter interaction becomes stronger, potentially leading to efficient and ultrafast radiative emission, both in the spontaneous and stimulated regimes. These features have created wide expectations for the practical prospects of such nanoscale light sources, in particular for optical interconnects. In this paper, we examine the limits to the downscaling of LEDs and lasers and ask ourselves which type of source is most suited to ultralow-power optical communications. Based on simple physical considerations on the scaling of spontaneous and stimulated emission rates for semiconductor active regions at room temperature, we analyze the speed and energy limits for nanoLEDs and nanolasers as a function of their size. The role of spontaneous emission enhancement (Purcell effect) in practical nanophotonic sources is also revisited. The main conclusion is that nanoLEDs reach a fundamental energy/speed limit for data rates exceeding a few gigahertz per second, whereas nanolasers with active dimensions in the range of few hundred nanometers may enable direct modulation rates larger than 40 Gb/s at power levels adequate for short-distance and low-energy optical interconnects. Bruno Romeira, Andrea Fiore |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |