Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bruno Romeira

dblp:65/8124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-1485-6665ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 50% Optical networks · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Integrated circuit design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications
optical communication
0.412020
Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical Communications · Proc. IEEE 2020
Optical networks
optical interconnect
0.412020
Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical Communications · Proc. IEEE 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rate equation analysis · 0.9purcell effect · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Physical Limits of NanoLEDs and Nanolasers for Optical Communications
abstract
Nanoscale light sources are being intensively investigated for their potential to enable low-energy, high-density optical communication and sensing systems. Both nanolight-emitting diodes (nanoLEDs) and nanolasers have been considered, based on advanced nanophotonic concepts such as photonic crystals and plasmonic structures, with dimensions well into the submicrometer domain. With decreasing dimensions, light-matter interaction becomes stronger, potentially leading to efficient and ultrafast radiative emission, both in the spontaneous and stimulated regimes. These features have created wide expectations for the practical prospects of such nanoscale light sources, in particular for optical interconnects. In this paper, we examine the limits to the downscaling of LEDs and lasers and ask ourselves which type of source is most suited to ultralow-power optical communications. Based on simple physical considerations on the scaling of spontaneous and stimulated emission rates for semiconductor active regions at room temperature, we analyze the speed and energy limits for nanoLEDs and nanolasers as a function of their size. The role of spontaneous emission enhancement (Purcell effect) in practical nanophotonic sources is also revisited. The main conclusion is that nanoLEDs reach a fundamental energy/speed limit for data rates exceeding a few gigahertz per second, whereas nanolasers with active dimensions in the range of few hundred nanometers may enable direct modulation rates larger than 40 Gb/s at power levels adequate for short-distance and low-energy optical interconnects.
Bruno Romeira, Andrea Fiore
Proc. IEEE1