Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guillaume Doisy
dblp:66/10010
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 7 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Motion planning and robot control · 28% Robot manipulation · 9% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Interaction techniques and input · 53% Human-robot interaction · 47% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
kinematic constraints |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Kinematic-ICP: Enhancing LiDAR Odometry with Kinematic Constraints for Wheeled Mobile Robots Moving on Planar Surfaces · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
LiDAR odometry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Kinematic-ICP: Enhancing LiDAR Odometry with Kinematic Constraints for Wheeled Mobile Robots Moving on Planar Surfaces · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Kinematic-ICP: Enhancing LiDAR Odometry with Kinematic Constraints for Wheeled Mobile Robots Moving on Planar Surfaces · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
wheeled mobile robot |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Kinematic-ICP: Enhancing LiDAR Odometry with Kinematic Constraints for Wheeled Mobile Robots Moving on Planar Surfaces · ICRA 2025 |
Human-robot interaction › robot perception
person tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Human-robot interaction through 3D vision and force control · HRI 2014 |
Interaction techniques and input
gesture input |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Spatially unconstrained, gesture-based human-robot interaction · HRI 2013 |
Interaction techniques and input › input sensing
gesture recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Position-invariant, real-time gesture recognition based on dynamic time warping · HRI 2013 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
physical human-robot interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Sensorless collision detection and control by physical interaction for wheeled mobile robots · HRI 2012 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
sensorless collision detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Sensorless collision detection and control by physical interaction for wheeled mobile robots · HRI 2012 |
Human-robot interaction › robot control
force control |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Human-robot interaction through 3D vision and force control · HRI 2014 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › observer-based control
disturbance observer-based control |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Sensorless collision detection and control by physical interaction for wheeled mobile robots · HRI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative closest point · 0.9visual control · 0.2gesture recognition · 0.2SLAM · 0.2dynamic time warping · 0.2torque disturbance observation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Kinematic-ICP: Enhancing LiDAR Odometry with Kinematic Constraints for Wheeled Mobile Robots Moving on Planar Surfaces
Tiziano Guadagnino, Benedikt Mersch, Ignacio Vizzo, Meher V. R. Malladi, Luca Lobefaro, Guillaume Doisy, Cyrill Stachniss |
ICRA | 7 |
| 2015 | Comparison of Interaction Modalities for Mobile Indoor Robot Guidance: Direct Physical Interaction, Person Following, and Pointing ControlabstractThree advanced natural interaction modalities for mobile robot guidance in an indoor environment were developed and compared using two tasks and quantitative metrics to measure performance and workload. The first interaction modality is based on direct physical interaction requiring the human user to push the robot in order to displace it. The second and third interaction modalities exploit a 3-D vision-based human-skeleton tracking allowing the user to guide the robot by either walking in front of it or by pointing toward a desired location. In the first task, the participants were asked to guide the robot between different rooms in a simulated physical apartment requiring rough movement of the robot through designated areas. The second task evaluated robot guidance in the same environment through a set of waypoints, which required accurate movements. The three interaction modalities were implemented on a generic differential drive mobile platform equipped with a pan-tilt system and a Kinect camera. Task completion time and accuracy were used as metrics to assess the users' performance, while the NASA-TLX questionnaire was used to evaluate the users' workload. A study with 24 participants indicated that choice of interaction modality had significant effect on completion time (F (2, 61) = 84.874, p <; 0.001), accuracy (F (2, 29) = 4.937, p = 0.016), and workload (F (2, 68) = 11.948, p <; 0.001). The direct physical interaction required less time, provided more accuracy and less workload than the two contactless interaction modalities. Between the two contactless interaction modalities, the person-following interaction modality was systematically better than the pointing-control one: The participants completed the tasks faster with less workload. Aleksandar Jevtic, Guillaume Doisy, Yisrael Parmet, Yael Edan |
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. | 2 |
| 2014 | Human-robot interaction through 3D vision and force controlabstractThe video shows the interaction with a customized Kompa\"{i} robot. The robot consists of the Robosoft's robuLAB10 platform, tablet PC, and a Microsoft Kinect camera mounted on a pan-tilt system. A visual control algorithm provides continuous person tracking. The newly developed robot features include gesture recognition, person following, navigation with pointing, and force control, which were integrated with the Robosoft's robuBOX SDK and the Karto SLAM algorithms. The video demonstrates all the features and puts the robot in use in an everyday home scenario. Aleksandar Jevtic, Guillaume Doisy, Sasa Bodiroza, Yael Edan, Verena V. Hafner |
HRI | 2 |
| 2014 | The Impact of Human-Robot Interface Design on the Use of a Learning Robot SystemabstractThere is limited knowledge on how to design effective interfaces to enable nonexpert users to interact with robot learning algorithms. This paper focuses on an interface design challenge: How to provide the user with sufficient information about the learned behavior. A simulated robotic task where the robot has online learning capabilities was developed. This platform was used to study the impact of the variability of the environmental conditions, the information provided on the relation between the learned robot behavior and the conditions in the environment, and the presence of a preview of the learned robot behavior on the use of the system and on task performance. The results show significant effects of the type and the quantity of displayed information. Forty-two participants made the best use of brief and contextualized notifications about changes in the environment: their presence improved the overall performance and the usage of the automation and reduced the workload. In contrast, adding previews of the learned behavior surprisingly impaired performance and reduced the use of automation. Guillaume Doisy, Joachim Meyer 0002, Yael Edan |
IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | Position-invariant, real-time gesture recognition based on dynamic time warping
Sasa Bodiroza, Guillaume Doisy, Verena V. Hafner |
HRI | 2 |
| 2013 | Spatially unconstrained, gesture-based human-robot interaction
Guillaume Doisy, Aleksandar Jevtic, Sasa Bodiroza |
HRI | 1 |
| 2013 | Responses to Warnings and the Effect of Notifications in a Simulated Robot-Control TaskabstractWe studied the effects of changes of system sensitivity over time and of providing notification about these changes on the responses to binary warnings in a simulated robotic task. Participants had to decide how much risk to take based on the output of a binary warning indicator. Experimental conditions differed in the presence or absence of notifications about changes of sensitivity of the warning system. Such changes happened twice during the experiment. The first change was an increase and the second a decrease of the sensitivity, returning it to its initial value. Participants successfully adapted their responses to the changes when notifications about the changes were displayed. However, without notifications, they did not properly adjust their response to changes, and their levels of compliance and reliance were differentially affected by the change, indicating a distinction between these two dimensions of trust. Guillaume Doisy, Joachim Meyer 0002 |
SMC | 1 |
| 2012 | Sensorless collision detection and control by physical interaction for wheeled mobile robotsabstractIn this paper, we present the adaptation of a sensorless (in De Luca's sense [1], i.e., without the use of extra sensors,) collision detection approach previously used on robotic arms to mobile wheeled robots. The method is based on detecting the torque disturbance and does not require a model of the robot's dynamics. We then consider the feasibility of developing control by physical interaction strategies using the described adapted technique. Guillaume Doisy |
HRI | 1 |