Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daeui Park

dblp:66/109 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9452-5849ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
predictive toxicology
0.612022
ToxSTAR: drug-induced liver injury prediction tool for the web environment · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
structural similarity
0.612022
ToxSTAR: drug-induced liver injury prediction tool for the web environment · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction › protein-protein interaction network analysis
comparative interactomics
0.112005
Comparative interactomics analysis of protein family interaction networks using PSIMAP (protein structural interactome map) · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction network
0.112005
Comparative interactomics analysis of protein family interaction networks using PSIMAP (protein structural interactome map) · Bioinform. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural similarity · 0.6DILI prediction models · 0.6structural interaction prediction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Characterizing efficient feature selection for single-cell expression analysis
abstract
Unsupervised feature selection is a critical step for efficient and accurate analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data. Previous benchmarks used two different criteria to compare feature selection methods: (i) proportion of ground-truth marker genes included in the selected features and (ii) accuracy of cell clustering using ground-truth cell types. Here, we systematically compare the performance of 11 feature selection methods for both criteria. We first demonstrate the discordance between these criteria and suggest using the latter. We then compare the distribution of selected genes in their means between feature selection methods. We show that lowly expressed genes exhibit seriously high coefficients of variation and are mostly excluded by high-performance methods. In particular, high-deviation- and high-expression-based methods outperform the widely used in Seurat package in clustering cells and data visualization. We further show they also enable a clear separation of the same cell type from different tissues as well as accurate estimation of cell trajectories.
Juok Cho, Bukyung Baik, Hai C. T. Nguyen, Daeui Park, Dougu Nam
Briefings Bioinform.4
2022 ToxSTAR: drug-induced liver injury prediction tool for the web environment
abstract
SUMMARY: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging endpoint in predictive toxicology because of the complex reactive metabolites that cause liver damage and the wide range of mechanisms involved in the development of the disease. ToxSTAR provides structural similarity-based DILI analysis and in-house DILI prediction models that predict four DILI subtypes (cholestasis, cirrhosis, hepatitis and steatosis) based on drug and drug metabolite molecules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ToxSTAR is freely available at https://toxstar.kitox.re.kr/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hyun Kil Shin, Hang-Suk Chun, Se-Myo Park, Daeui Park, Myung-Gyun Kang, Sungbo Hwang, Jung-Hwa Oh, Hyoung-Yun Han, Woo-Keun Kim, Seokjoo Yoon
Bioinform.5
2010 Protein network prediction and topological analysis in Leishmania major as a tool for drug target selection
abstract
BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis is a virulent parasitic infection that causes a worldwide disease burden. Most treatments have toxic side-effects and efficacy has decreased due to the emergence of resistant strains. The outlook is worsened by the absence of promising drug targets for this disease. We have taken a computational approach to the detection of new drug targets, which may become an effective strategy for the discovery of new drugs for this tropical disease. RESULTS: We have predicted the protein interaction network of Leishmania major by using three validated methods: PSIMAP, PEIMAP, and iPfam. Combining the results from these methods, we calculated a high confidence network (confidence score > 0.70) with 1,366 nodes and 33,861 interactions. We were able to predict the biological process for 263 interacting proteins by doing enrichment analysis of the clusters detected. Analyzing the topology of the network with metrics such as connectivity and betweenness centrality, we detected 142 potential drug targets after homology filtering with the human proteome. Further experiments can be done to validate these targets. CONCLUSION: We have constructed the first protein interaction network of the Leishmania major parasite by using a computational approach. The topological analysis of the protein network enabled us to identify a set of candidate proteins that may be both (1) essential for parasite survival and (2) without human orthologs. These potential targets are promising for further experimental validation. This strategy, if validated, may augment established drug discovery methodologies, for this and possibly other tropical diseases, with a relatively low additional investment of time and resources.
Andrés F. Flórez, Daeui Park, Jong Bhak, Byoung-Chul Kim, Allan Kuchinsky, John Scotter Morris, Jairo Espinosa, Carlos Muskus
BMC Bioinform.2
2009 Gevab: a prototype genome variation analysis browsing server
abstract
BACKGROUND: The first Korean individual diploid genome sequence data (KOREF) was publicized in December 2008. RESULTS: A Korean genome variation analysis and browsing server (Gevab) was constructed as a database and web server for the exploration and downloading of Korean personal genome(s). Information in the Gevab includes SNPs, short indels, and structural variation (SV) and comparison analysis between the NCBI human reference and the Korean genome(s). The user can find information on assembled consensus sequences, sequenced short reads, genetic variations, and relationships between genotype and phenotypes. CONCLUSION: This server is openly and publicly available online at http://koreagenome.org/en/ or directly http://gevab.org.
Woo-Yeon Kim, Sang-Yoon Kim, Sung-Min Ahn, Ha Na Byun, Deokhoon Kim, Dae-Soo Kim, Yong Seok Lee, Ho Ghang, Daeui Park, Byoung-Chul Kim, Chulhong Kim, Sunghoon Lee, Seong-Jin Kim, Jong Bhak
BMC Bioinform.10
2008 SNP@Promoter: a database of human SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) within the putative promoter regions
abstract
BACKGROUND: Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is becoming a key research in genomics fields. Many functional analyses of SNPs have been carried out for coding regions and splicing sites that can alter proteins and mRNA splicing. However, SNPs in non-coding regulatory regions can also influence important biological regulation. Presently, there are few databases for SNPs in non-coding regulatory regions. DESCRIPTION: We identified 488,452 human SNPs in the putative promoter regions that extended from the +5000 bp to -500 bp region of the transcription start sites. Some SNPs occurring in transcription factor (TF) binding sites were also predicted (47,832 SNP; 9.8%). The result is stored in a database: SNP@promoter. Users can search the SNP@Promoter database using three entries: 1) by SNP identifier (rs number from dbSNP), 2) by gene (gene name, gene symbol, refSeq ID), and 3) by disease term. The SNP@Promoter database provides extensive genetic information and graphical views of queried terms. CONCLUSION: We present the SNP@Promoter database. It was created in order to predict functional SNPs in putative promoter regions and predicted transcription factor binding sites. SNP@Promoter will help researchers to identify functional SNPs in non-coding regions.
Byoung-Chul Kim, Woo-Yeon Kim, Daeui Park, Won-Hyong Chung, Kwang-Sik Shin, Jong Bhak
BMC Bioinform.3
2008 Predicting the Interactome of Xanthomonas oryzae pathovar oryzae for target selection and DB service
abstract
BACKGROUND: Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) play key roles in various cellular functions. In addition, some critical inter-species interactions such as host-pathogen interactions and pathogenicity occur through PPIs. Phytopathogenic bacteria infect hosts through attachment to host tissue, enzyme secretion, exopolysaccharides production, toxins release, iron acquisition, and effector proteins secretion. Many such mechanisms involve some kind of protein-protein interaction in hosts. Our first aim was to predict the whole protein interaction pairs (interactome) of Xanthomonas oryzae pathovar oryzae (Xoo) that is an important pathogenic bacterium that causes bacterial blight (BB) in rice. We developed a detection protocol to find possibly interacting proteins in its host using whole genome PPI prediction algorithms. The second aim was to build a DB server and a bioinformatic procedure for finding target proteins in Xoo for developing pesticides that block host-pathogen protein interactions within critical biochemical pathways. DESCRIPTION: A PPI network in Xoo proteome was predicted by bioinformatics algorithms: PSIMAP, PEIMAP, and iPfam. We present the resultant species specific interaction network and host-pathogen interaction, XooNET. It is a comprehensive predicted initial PPI data for Xoo. XooNET can be used by experimentalists to pick up protein targets for blocking pathological interactions. XooNET uses most of the major types of PPI algorithms. They are: 1) Protein Structural Interactome MAP (PSIMAP), a method using structural domain of SCOP, 2) Protein Experimental Interactome MAP (PEIMAP), a common method using public resources of experimental protein interaction information such as HPRD, BIND, DIP, MINT, IntAct, and BioGrid, and 3) Domain-domain interactions, a method using Pfam domains such as iPfam. Additionally, XooNET provides information on network properties of the Xoo interactome. CONCLUSION: XooNET is an open and free public database server for protein interaction information for Xoo. It contains 4,538 proteins and 26,932 possible interactions consisting of 18,503 (PSIMAP), 3,118 (PEIMAP), and 8,938 (iPfam) pairs. In addition, XooNET provides 3,407 possible interaction pairs between two sets of proteins; 141 Xoo proteins that are predicted as membrane proteins and rice proteomes. The resultant interacting partners of a query protein can be easily retrieved by users as well as the interaction networks in graphical web interfaces. XooNET is freely available from http://bioportal.kobic.kr/XooNET/.
Jeong-Gu Kim, Daeui Park, Byoung-Chul Kim, Seong-Woong Cho, Yeong Tae Kim, Young-Jin Park, Hee Jung Cho, Hyunseok Park, Ki-Bong Kim, Kyong-Oh Yoon, Soo-Jun Park, Byoung-Moo Lee, Jong Bhak
BMC Bioinform.2
2005 Comparative interactomics analysis of protein family interaction networks using PSIMAP (protein structural interactome map)
abstract
MOTIVATION: Many genomes have been completely sequenced. However, detecting and analyzing their protein-protein interactions by experimental methods such as co-immunoprecipitation, tandem affinity purification and Y2H is not as fast as genome sequencing. Therefore, a computational prediction method based on the known protein structural interactions will be useful to analyze large-scale protein-protein interaction rules within and among complete genomes. RESULTS: We confirmed that all the predicted protein family interactomes (the full set of protein family interactions within a proteome) of 146 species are scale-free networks, and they share a small core network comprising 36 protein families related to indispensable cellular functions. We found two fundamental differences among prokaryotic and eukaryotic interactomes: (1) eukarya had significantly more hub families than archaea and bacteria and (2) certain special hub families determined the topology of the eukaryotic interactomes. Our comparative analysis suggests that a very small number of expansive protein families led to the evolution of interactomes and seemed to have played a key role in species diversification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://interactomics.org.
Daeui Park, Semin Lee, Dan M. Bolser, Michael Schroeder 0001, Michael Lappe, Donghoon Oh, Jong Bhak
Bioinform.1