Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abdulrahman Almutairi
dblp:66/10933
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
access control |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Composability Verification of Multi-Service Workflows in a Policy-Driven Cloud Computing Environment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017 |
Authentication and access control › security policy
security policy verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Composability Verification of Multi-Service Workflows in a Policy-Driven Cloud Computing Environment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017 |
Services computing and microservices › service composition
workflow composition |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Composability Verification of Multi-Service Workflows in a Policy-Driven Cloud Computing Environment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
projected workflow decomposition · 0.6composability verification · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DMoiSDN: A defensive mechanism of object integrity for SDNabstractSummary Software‐defined network (SDN) technology is widely used for computer networks, especially in enterprise data centers and virtualized networking. However, SDN networks encounter severe challenges to security. One such challenge comes from third‐party applications that contain malicious logic and security vulnerabilities, resulting in controller integrity attacks. In this paper, we propose a defensive mechanism of object integrity for SDN (DMoiSDN) to mitigate the issue known as Cross‐App Poisoning (CAP). Our results contribute to increasing the integrity level of the controller's resources by conducting a potential risk analysis, which showed a decrease of 57% in the risk factor for potential attacks. We further examined the results of comparing DMoiSDN's performance with related work that uses information flow control (IFC) policies. The best results among the three conducted scenarios were as follows: we found that decreased latency in our system ranged from 12% to 90%, with an average of 59%, when encountering an increase in requests. It ranged from 78% to 49%, with an average of 63%, when receiving a variable number of total permissions for each application. DMoiSDN is expected to show a perceptible but reasonable latency and, to some extent, be able to avoid a critical impact on performance. Nora A. Alsalamh, Abdulrahman Almutairi, Abdulmalik Humayed 0001, Mohammed J. F. Alenazi |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 2 |
| 2018 | Risk-Aware Management of Virtual Resources in Access Controlled Service-Oriented Cloud DatacentersabstractFor economic benefits and efficient management of resources, organizations are increasingly moving towards the paradigm of “cloud computing” by which they are allowed on-demand delivery of hardware, software and data as services. However, there are many security challenges which are particularly exacerbated by the multitenancy and virtualization features of cloud computing that allow sharing of resources among potentially untrusted tenants in access controlled cloud data centers. This can result in increased risk of data leakage. To address this risk vulnerability, we propose an efficient risk-aware virtual resource assignment mechanism for clouds multitenant environment. In particular, we introduce the notion of sensitivity in data centers and the objective is to minimize the risk of data leakage. In addition, the risk should not exceed in high sensitivity data centers in comparison to low sensitivity data centers. We present three assignment heuristics and compare their relative performance. Abdulrahman Almutairi, Muhammad I. Sarfraz, Arif Ghafoor |
IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. | 1 |
| 2017 | Composability Verification of Multi-Service Workflows in a Policy-Driven Cloud Computing EnvironmentabstractThe emergence of cloud computing infrastructure and Semantic Web technologies has created unprecedented opportunities for composing large-scale business processes and workflow-based applications that span multiple organizational domains. A key challenge related to composition of such multi-organizational business processes and workflows is posed by the security and access control policies of the underlying organizational domains. In this paper, we propose a framework for verifying secure composability of distributed workflows in an autonomous multi-domain environment. The objective of workflow composability verification is to ensure that all the users or processes executing the designated workflow tasks conform to the time-dependent security policy specifications of all collaborating domains. A key aspect of such verification is to determine the time-dependent schedulability of distributed workflows, assumed to be invoked on a recurrent basis. We use a two-step approach for verifying secure workflow composability. In the first step, a distributed workflow is decomposed into domain-specific projected workflows and is verified for conformance with the respective domain's security and access control policy. In the second step, the cross-domain dependencies amongst the workflow tasks performed by different collaborating domains are verified. Basit Shafiq, Sameera Ghayyur, Ammar Masood, Zahid Pervaiz, Abdulrahman Almutairi, M. Farrukh Khan, Arif Ghafoor |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 5 |