Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patrik O. Hoyer
dblp:66/1138
· DBLP profile ↗
35ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 35 · 10 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 72% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 67% Mathematical optimization · 33% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.6 | 5 | 2013 | Experiment selection for causal discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012 DirectLiNGAM: A Direct Method for Learning a Linear Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012 Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects: an identifiable model based on non-Gaussianity · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
linear non-gaussian acyclic model |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | DirectLiNGAM: A Direct Method for Learning a Linear Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
experiment selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Experiment selection for causal discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
cyclic causal models |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
direct method |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | DirectLiNGAM: A Direct Method for Learning a Linear Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Model · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
bivariate causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Telling cause from effect based on high-dimensional observations · ICML 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Telling cause from effect based on high-dimensional observations · ICML 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 Emergence of Topography and Complex Cell Properties from Natural Images using Extensions of ICA · NIPS 1999 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
additive noise model |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects: an identifiable model based on non-Gaussianity · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
nonlinear causal discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models · NIPS 2008 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object recognition
appearance-based object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Equivalence of Some Common Linear Feature Extraction Techniques for Appearance-Based Object Recognition Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Equivalence of Some Common Linear Feature Extraction Techniques for Appearance-Based Object Recognition Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Equivalence of Some Common Linear Feature Extraction Techniques for Appearance-Based Object Recognition Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Equivalence of Some Common Linear Feature Extraction Techniques for Appearance-Based Object Recognition Tasks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
observational data |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization › low-rank matrix factorization
nonnegative matrix factorization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2004 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Interpreting Neural Response Variability as Monte Carlo Sampling of the Posterior · NIPS 2002 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Interpreting Neural Response Variability as Monte Carlo Sampling of the Posterior · NIPS 2002 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
visual cortex modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Emergence of Topography and Complex Cell Properties from Natural Images using Extensions of ICA · NIPS 1999 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Sparse Code Shrinkage: Denoising by Nonlinear Maximum Likelihood Estimation · NIPS 1998 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Sparse Code Shrinkage: Denoising by Nonlinear Maximum Likelihood Estimation · NIPS 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
independent component analysis · 0.3non-gaussianity · 0.2causal discovery · 0.2linear structural equation model · 0.1ICA · 0.1direct estimation · 0.1nonlinear regression · 0.1bayesian network · 0.1autoregressive model · 0.1additive noise model · 0.1whitening · 0.1PCA · 0.1nonnegative matrix factorization · 0.0nonlinear estimation · 0.0maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Data-driven covariate selection for nonparametric estimation of causal effectsabstractThe estimation of causal effects from non-experimental data is a fundamental problem in many fields of science. One of the main obstacles concerns confounding by observed or latent covariates, an issue which is typically tackled by adjusting for some set of observed covariates. In this contribution, we analyze the problem of inferring whether a given variable has a causal effect on another and, if it does, inferring an adjustment set of covariates that yields a consistent and unbiased estimator of this effect, based on the (conditional) independence and dependence relationships among the observed variables. We provide two elementary rules that we show to be both sound and complete for this task, and compare the performance of a straightforward application of these rules with standard alternative procedures for selecting adjustment sets. Doris Entner, Patrik O. Hoyer, Peter Spirtes |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2013 | Discovering Cyclic Causal Models with Latent Variables: A General SAT-Based Procedure
Antti Hyttinen, Patrik O. Hoyer, Frederick Eberhardt, Matti Järvisalo |
UAI | 2 |
| 2013 | Experiment selection for causal discovery
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2012 | Estimating a Causal Order among Groups of Variables in Linear Models
Doris Entner, Patrik O. Hoyer |
ICANN (2) | 2 |
| 2012 | Causal Discovery of Linear Cyclic Models from Multiple Experimental Data Sets with Overlapping Variables
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer |
UAI | 3 |
| 2012 | Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2011 | Noisy-OR Models with Latent Confounding
Antti Hyttinen, Frederick Eberhardt, Patrik O. Hoyer |
UAI | 3 |
| 2011 | DirectLiNGAM: A Direct Method for Learning a Linear Non-Gaussian Structural Equation Model
Shohei Shimizu, Takanori Inazumi, Yasuhiro Sogawa, Aapo Hyvärinen, Yoshinobu Kawahara, Takashi Washio, Patrik O. Hoyer, Kenneth Bollen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 7 |
| 2010 | Telling cause from effect based on high-dimensional observations
Dominik Janzing, Patrik O. Hoyer, Bernhard Schölkopf |
ICML | 2 |
| 2010 | Estimation of a Structural Vector Autoregression Model Using Non-Gaussianity
Aapo Hyvärinen, Kun Zhang 0001, Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O. Hoyer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2009 | Bayesian Discovery of Linear Acyclic Causal Models
Patrik O. Hoyer, Antti Hyttinen |
UAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Estimation of linear non-Gaussian acyclic models for latent factors
Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2008 | Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects: an identifiable model based on non-GaussianityabstractCausal analysis of continuous-valued variables typically uses either autoregressive models or linear Gaussian Bayesian networks with instantaneous effects. Estimation of Gaussian Bayesian networks poses serious identifiability problems, which is why it was recently proposed to use non-Gaussian models. Here, we show how to combine the non-Gaussian instantaneous model with autoregressive models. We show that such a non-Gaussian model is identifiable without prior knowledge of network structure, and we propose an estimation method shown to be consistent. This approach also points out how neglecting instantaneous effects can lead to completely wrong estimates of the autoregressive coefficients. Aapo Hyvärinen, Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O. Hoyer |
ICML | 3 |
| 2008 | Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise modelsabstractThe discovery of causal relationships between a set of observed variables is a fundamental problem in science. For continuous-valued data linear acyclic causal models are often used because these models are well understood and there are well-known methods to fit them to data. In reality, of course, many causal relationships are more or less nonlinear, raising some doubts as to the applicability and usefulness of purely linear methods. In this contribution we show that in fact the basic linear framework can be generalized to nonlinear models with additive noise. In this extended framework, nonlinearities in the data-generating process are in fact a blessing rather than a curse, as they typically provide information on the underlying causal system and allow more aspects of the true data-generating mechanisms to be identified. In addition to theoretical results we show simulations and some simple real data experiments illustrating the identification power provided by nonlinearities. Patrik O. Hoyer, Dominik Janzing, Joris M. Mooij, Jonas Peters, Bernhard Schölkopf |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2008 | Causal discovery of linear acyclic models with arbitrary distributions
Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen, Richard Scheines, Peter Spirtes, Joseph D. Ramsey, Gustavo Lacerda, Shohei Shimizu |
UAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Discovering Cyclic Causal Models by Independent Components Analysis
Gustavo Lacerda, Peter Spirtes, Joseph D. Ramsey, Patrik O. Hoyer |
UAI | 4 |
| 2008 | Estimation of causal effects using linear non-Gaussian causal models with hidden variables
Patrik O. Hoyer, Shohei Shimizu, Antti J. Kerminen, Markus Palviainen |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 1 |
| 2007 | Equivalence of Some Common Linear Feature Extraction Techniques for Appearance-Based Object Recognition TasksabstractRecently, a number of empirical studies have compared the performance of PCA and ICA as feature extraction methods in appearance-based object recognition systems, with mixed and seemingly contradictory results. In this paper, we briefly describe the connection between the two methods and argue that whitened PCA may yield identical results to ICA in some cases. Furthermore, we describe the specific situations in which ICA might significantly improve on PCA. Maria Asunción Vicente, Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2006 | A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal DiscoveryabstractIn recent years, several methods have been proposed for the discovery of causal structure from non-experimental data. Such methods make various assumptions on the data generating process to facilitate its identification from purely observational data. Continuing this line of research, we show how to discover the complete causal structure of continuous-valued data, under the assumptions that (a) the data generating process is linear, (b) there are no unobserved confounders, and (c) disturbance variables have non-Gaussian distributions of non-zero variances. The solution relies on the use of the statistical method known as independent component analysis, and does not require any pre-specified time-ordering of the variables. We provide a complete Matlab package for performing this LiNGAM analysis (short for Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model), and demonstrate the effectiveness of the method using artificially generated data and real-world data. Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen, Antti J. Kerminen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2005 | Discovery of Non-gaussian Linear Causal Models using ICA
Shohei Shimizu, Aapo Hyvärinen, Yutaka Kano, Patrik O. Hoyer |
UAI | 4 |
| 2004 | Non-negative Matrix Factorization with Sparseness Constraints
Patrik O. Hoyer |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2003 | Modeling receptive fields with non-negative sparse coding
Patrik O. Hoyer |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2002 | Interpreting Neural Response Variability as Monte Carlo Sampling of the PosteriorabstractThe responses of cortical sensory neurons are notoriously variable, with the number of spikes evoked by identical stimuli varying significantly from trial to trial. This variability is most often interpreted as ‘noise’, purely detrimental to the sensory system. In this paper, we propose an al- ternative view in which the variability is related to the uncertainty, about world parameters, which is inherent in the sensory stimulus. Specifi- cally, the responses of a population of neurons are interpreted as stochas- tic samples from the posterior distribution in a latent variable model. In addition to giving theoretical arguments supporting such a representa- tional scheme, we provide simulations suggesting how some aspects of response variability might be understood in this framework. Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2002 | Sparse coding of natural contours
Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2001 | Topographic independent component analysis as a model of V1 organization and receptive fields
Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2001 | Topographic Independent Component AnalysisabstractIn ordinary independent component analysis, the components are assumed to be completely independent, and they do not necessarily have any meaningful order relationships. In practice, however, the estimated "independent" components are often not at all independent. We propose that this residual dependence structure could be used to define a topographic order for the components. In particular, a distance between two components could be defined using their higher-order correlations, and this distance could be used to create a topographic representation. Thus, we obtain a linear decomposition into approximately independent components, where the dependence of two components is approximated by the proximity of the components in the topographic representation. Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer, Mika Inki |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 2000 | Feature Extraction from Color and Stereo Images Using ICAabstractPrevious work has shown that independent component analysis (ICA) applied to natural image data yields features resembling Gabor functions and simple-cell receptive fields. This article considers the effects of including chromatic and stereo information. The inclusion of colour leads to features divided into separate red/green, blue/yellow, and bright/dark channels. Stereo image data, on the other hand, leads to binocular receptive fields which are tuned to various disparities. The similarities between these results and observed properties of simple cells in primary visual cortex are further evidence for the hypothesis that visual cortical neurons perform some type of redundancy reduction, which was one of the original motivations for ICA in the first place. In addition, ICA provides a principled method for feature extraction from colour and stereo images, such features could be used in image processing operations such as denoising, compression, and pattern recognition. Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
IJCNN (3) | 1 |
| 2000 | Topographic ICA as a Model of V1 Receptive FieldsabstractIndependent component analysis (ICA), which is equivalent to linear sparse coding, has been recently used as a model of natural image statistics and V1 receptive fields. Olshausen and Field applied the principle of maximizing the sparseness of the coefficients of a linear representation to extract features from natural images. This leads to the emergence of oriented linear filters that have simultaneous localization in space and in frequency, thus resembling Gabor functions and V1 simple cell receptive fields. In this paper, we extend this model to explain emergence of V1 topography. This is done by ordering the basis vectors so that vectors with strong higher-order correlations are near to each other. This is a new principle of topographic organization, and may be more relevant to natural image statistics than the more conventional topographic ordering based on Euclidean distances. For example, this topographic ordering leads to simultaneous emergence of complex cell properties: each neighbourhood acts like a complex cell. Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer, Mika Inki |
IJCNN (4) | 2 |
| 2000 | Emergence of Phase- and Shift-Invariant Features by Decomposition of Natural Images into Independent Feature SubspacesabstractOlshausen and Field (1996) applied the principle of independence maximization by sparse coding to extract features from natural images. This leads to the emergence of oriented linear filters that have simultaneous localization in space and in frequency, thus resembling Gabor functions and simple cell receptive fields. In this article, we show that the same principle of independence maximization can explain the emergence of phase- and shift-invariant features, similar to those found in complex cells. This new kind of emergence is obtained by maximizing the independence between norms of projections on linear subspaces (instead of the independence of simple linear filter outputs). The norms of the projections on such "independent feature subspaces" then indicate the values of invariant features. Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1999 | Estimating signal-adapted wavelets using sparseness criteriaabstractMultiresolution transforms have been shown to be effective for a variety of digital signal processing tasks. Recently, the task of adapting these usually fixed transforms to the statistics of the data has attracted much attention. So far, however, the methods proposed have been based exclusively on the second-order statistics of the signal. We show how to take into account higher order statistics to estimate a multiresolution transform from white data. The method is tested on speech data from the TIMIT database and is shown to give filters well adapted to the structure of the data. Patrik O. Hoyer, Aapo Hyvärinen |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 1999 | Independent subspace analysis shows emergence of phase and shift invariant features from natural imagesabstractOlshausen and Field (1996, 1997) applied the principle of independence maximization by sparse coding to extract features from natural images. This leads to the emergence of oriented linear filters that have simultaneous localization in space and in frequency, thus resembling Gabor functions and simple cell receptive fields. In this paper, we show that the same principle of independence maximization can explain the emergence of phase and shift invariant features, similar to those found in complex cells. This new kind of emergence is obtained by maximizing the independence between norms of projections on linear subspaces (instead of the independence of simple linear filter outputs). The norms of the projections on such 'independent feature subspaces' then indicate the values of invariant features. Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer |
IJCNN | 2 |
| 1999 | Emergence of Topography and Complex Cell Properties from Natural Images using Extensions of ICA
Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1999 | Image Feature Extraction and Denoising by Sparse Coding
Erkki Oja, Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer |
Pattern Anal. Appl. | 3 |
| 1998 | Image feature extraction by sparse coding and independent component analysisabstractSparse coding is a method for finding a representation of data in which each of the components of the representation is only rarely significantly active. Such a representation is closely related to the techniques of independent component analysis and blind source separation. In this paper, we investigate the application of sparse coding for image feature extraction. We show how sparse coding can be used to extract wavelet-like features from natural image data. As an application of such a feature extraction scheme, we show how to apply a soft-thresholding operator on the components of sparse coding in order to reduce Gaussian noise. Methods based on sparse coding have the important benefit over wavelet methods that the features are determined solely by the statistical properties of the data, while the wavelet transformation relies heavily on certain abstract mathematical properties that may be only weakly related to the properties of the natural data. Aapo Hyvärinen, Erkki Oja, Patrik O. Hoyer, Jarmo Hurri |
ICPR | 3 |
| 1998 | Sparse Code Shrinkage: Denoising by Nonlinear Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Aapo Hyvärinen, Patrik O. Hoyer, Erkki Oja |
NIPS | 2 |