Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lee D. Erman
dblp:66/1689 · also Lee Daniel Erman
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 69% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 24% Multi-agent systems · 7% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Distributed systems · 81% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 19% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding |
0.0 | 8 | 1981 | The Design and an Example Use of Hearsay-III · IJCAI 1981 HEARSAY-II: A Domain-Independent Framework for Expert Systems · AAAI 1980 Speech Understanding and AI/AI and Speech Understanding · IJCAI 1977 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition › continuous speech recognition
large vocabulary continuous speech recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Noah-A Bottom-Up Word Hypothesizer for Large-Vocabulary Speech Understanding Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1981 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
expert systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | HEARSAY-II: A Domain-Independent Framework for Expert Systems · AAAI 1980 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › cognitive modeling › cognitive architecture
blackboard architecture |
0.0 | 2 | 1981 | The Design and an Example Use of Hearsay-III · IJCAI 1981 A Retrospective View of the Hearsay-II Architecture · IJCAI 1977 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multiprocessor architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1973 | System Organizations for Speech Understanding: Implications of Network and Multiprocessor Computer Architecture for AI · IJCAI 1973 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | The Hearsay- I Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition Process · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
blackboard architecture · 0.0dataflow · 0.0resource allocation · 0.0model development · 0.0knowledge representation · 0.0interprocess communication · 0.0hypothesize-and-test paradigm · 0.0heuristic search · 0.0bottom-up acoustic word hypothesis · 0.0hypothesis prediction and verification · 0.0cooperating independent processes · 0.0Hearsay-II · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Distributed Intelligent Control and Management: Concepts, Methods and Tools for Developing DICAM ApplicationsabstractThe authors are developing a generic control architecture suitable for use as a single intelligent agent or as multiple cooperating agents. The generic architecture combines a task-oriented domain controller with a meta-controller that schedules activities within the domain controller. The domain controller provides functions for model-based situation assessment and planning, and inter-controller communication. Typically, these functions are performed by modules taken from a repository of reusable software. To improve the controller development process, the authors are combining many of the best ideas from software engineering and knowledge engineering in a software environment. This environment includes a blackboard-like development workspace to represent both the software under development and the software development process itself.> Frederick Hayes-Roth, Lee D. Erman, Allan Terry, Barbara Hayes-Roth |
SEKE | 2 |
| 1990 | Concepts, Methods, and Languages for Building Timely Intelligent Systems
Jay S. Lark, Lee D. Erman, Stephanie Forrest, Kim P. Gostelow |
Real Time Syst. | 2 |
| 1988 | ABE: An Environment for Engineering Intelligent SystemsabstractThe ABE multilevel architecture for developing intelligent systems addresses the key problems of intelligent systems engineering: large-scale applications and the reuse and integration of software components. ABE defines a virtual machine for module-oriented programming and a cooperative operating system that provides access to the capabilities of that virtual machine. On top of the virtual machine, ABE provides a number of system design and development frameworks, which embody such programming metaphors as control flow, blackboards, and dataflow. These frameworks support the construction of capabilities, including knowledge processing tools, which span a range from primitive modules to skeletal systems. Finally, applications can be built on skeletal systems. In addition, ABE supports the importation of existing software, including both conventional and knowledge processing tools.> Lee D. Erman, Jay S. Lark, Frederick Hayes-Roth |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 1981 | The Design and an Example Use of Hearsay-III
Lee D. Erman, Philip London, Stephen Fickas |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1981 | Noah-A Bottom-Up Word Hypothesizer for Large-Vocabulary Speech Understanding SystemsabstractCurrent high-accuracy speech understanding systems achieve their performance at the cost of highly constrained grammars over relatively small vocabularies. Less-constrained systems will need to compensate for their loss of top-down constraint by improving bottom-up performance. To do this, they will need to eliminate from consideration at each place in the utterance most words in their vocabularies solely on the basis of acoustic information and expected pronunciations of the words. Towards this goal, we present the design and performance of Noah, a bottom-up word hypothesizer which is capable of handling large vocabularies-more than 10 000 words. Noah takes (machine) segmented and labeled speech as input and produces word hypotheses. The primary concern of this work is the problem of word hypothesizing from large vocabularies. Particular attention has been paid to accuracy, knowledge representation, knowledge acquisition, and flexibility. In this paper we discuss the problem of word hypothesizing, describe how the design of Noah faces these problems, and present the performance of Noah as a function of the vocabulary size. A. Richard Smith, Lee D. Erman |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 1980 | HEARSAY-II: A Domain-Independent Framework for Expert Systems
Robert Balzer, Lee D. Erman, Philip London, Chuck Williams |
AAAI | 2 |
| 1980 | Distributed Interpretation: A Model and ExperimentabstractThe range of application areas to which distributed processing has been applied effectively is limited. In order to extend this range, new models for organizing distributed systems must be developed. Victor R. Lesser, Lee D. Erman |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1977 | A Retrospective View of the Hearsay-II Architecture
Victor R. Lesser, Lee D. Erman |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1977 | Speech Understanding and AI/AI and Speech Understanding
Donald E. Walker, Lee D. Erman, Allen Newell, Nils J. Nilsson, William H. Paxton, Terry Winograd, William A. Woods |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1976 | System Organizations for Speech Understanding: Implications of Network and Multiprocessor Computer Architectures for AIabstractThis paper considers various factors affecting system em organization for speech understanding research. The structure of the Hearsay system based on a set of cooperating, independent processes using the hypothesize-and-test paradigm is presented. Design considerations for the effective use of multiprocessor and network achitectures in speech understanding systems ems are presented: control of processes, interprocess communication and data sharing, resource allocation, and debugging are discussed.1 Lee D. Erman, Richard D. Fennell, Victor R. Lesser, Raj Reddy |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 1976 | The Hearsay- I Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition ProcessabstractThis paper describes the structure and operation of the Hearsay-I1speech understanding system by the use of a specific example illustrating the various stages of recognition. The system consists of a set of cooperating independent processes, each representing a source of knowledge. The knowledge is used either to predict what may appear in a given context or to verify hypotheses resulting from a prediction. The structure of the system is illustrated by considering its operation in a particular task situation: Voice-Chess. The representation and use of various sources of knowledge are outlined. Preliminary results of the reduction in search resulting from the use of various sources of knowledge are given. Raj Reddy, Lee D. Erman, Richard D. Fennell, Richard B. Neely |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 1975 | A Multi-Level Organization For Problem Solving Using Many, Diverse, Cooperating Sources Of Knowledge
Lee D. Erman, Victor R. Lesser |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1973 | System Organizations for Speech Understanding: Implications of Network and Multiprocessor Computer Architecture for AI
Lee D. Erman, R. D. Fenneli, Victor R. Lesser, Raj Reddy |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1973 | The Hearsay Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition Process
Raj Reddy, Lee D. Erman, R. D. Fenneli, Richard B. Neely |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1972 | XCRIBL - A Hardcopy Scan Line Graphics System for Document Generation
Raj Reddy, W. Broadley, Lee D. Erman, R. Johnsson, J. Newcomer, George G. Robertson, J. Wright |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 3 |