EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingyi Zhang 0001
dblp:66/2146-1
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4052-4936ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Database system architecture and tuning · 47% Query processing and optimization · 28% Information retrieval · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Database system architecture and tuning
hybrid transactional and analytical processing |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | veDB-HTAP: a Highly Integrated, Efficient and Adaptive HTAP System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 ByteHTAP: ByteDance's HTAP System with High Data Freshness and Strong Data Consistency · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Query processing and optimization
adaptive query processing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | veDB-HTAP: a Highly Integrated, Efficient and Adaptive HTAP System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
query routing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | veDB-HTAP: a Highly Integrated, Efficient and Adaptive HTAP System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Database system architecture and tuning
workload management |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Workload Management in Database Management Systems: A Taxonomy · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 Workload Management in Database Management System: A Taxonomy (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2018 |
Database system architecture and tuning › database tuning
automatic database tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics Platform · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization › query compilation
just-in-time compilation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics Platform · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization
query compilation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics Platform · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics Platform · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud data analytics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics Platform · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
OLTP |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | veDB-HTAP: a Highly Integrated, Efficient and Adaptive HTAP System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › transformation-based optimization
query pushdown |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | ByteHTAP: ByteDance's HTAP System with High Data Freshness and Strong Data Consistency · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Database system architecture and tuning
main-memory database |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Data Management at Huawei: Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges · ICDE 2019 |
Database system architecture and tuning
self-managing database systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Data Management at Huawei: Recent Accomplishments and Future Challenges · ICDE 2019 |
Database system architecture and tuning
commercial database systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Workload Management in Database Management System: A Taxonomy (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.9cost-based optimization · 0.9taxonomy · 0.7global timestamp · 0.6delete bitmap · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | veDB-HTAP: a Highly Integrated, Efficient and Adaptive HTAP SystemabstractIn this paper, we describe veDB-HTAP, a highly integrated, efficient, and adaptive HTAP system recently built in ByteDance. veDB-HTAP adopts a highly integrated system architecture by leveraging the Secondary Engine mechanism provided by MySQL and provides a seamless query processing experience across OLTP and OLAP engines. In addition, we introduce a cost-based and machine-learning-based smart query router that significantly outperforms the rule-based query router used in ByteHTAP, a precursor of veDB-HTAP. A key design principle of veDB-HTAP is the collaboration and adaptability of major system components, including query planning, query execution, and unified storage. Our adaptive query execution can be classified into two categories: 1) adaptive execution that dynamically collects and utilizes runtime statistics for better query performance; 2) utilizing runtime resource information to achieve a high quality of service even under heavy workloads. The experiments show that veDB-HTAP can achieve more than 3× speedup for TPC-H while consuming only one-third of the resources compared to ByteHTAP. Jianjun Chen 0001, Li Zhang 0132, Lixun Cao, Yonghua Ding, Fangshi Li, Haibo Xiu, Kui Wei, Le Cai, Yuanjin Lin, Shangyu Luo, Jianfeng Qian, Zikang Wang, Mingyi Zhang 0001, Shicai Zeng, Jason Sun, Lei Zhang 0213, Pengwei Zhao |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 21 |
| 2022 | ByteHTAP: ByteDance's HTAP System with High Data Freshness and Strong Data ConsistencyabstractIn recent years, at ByteDance, we see more and more business scenarios that require performing complex analysis over freshly imported data, together with transaction support and strong data consistency. In this paper, we describe our journey of building ByteHTAP, an HTAP system with high data freshness and strong data consistency. It adopts a separate-engine and shared-storage architecture. Its modular system design fully utilizes an existing ByteDance's OLTP system and an open source OLAP system. This choice saves us a lot of resources and development time and allows easy future extensions such as replacing the query processing engine with other alternatives. ByteHTAP can provide high data freshness with less than one second delay, which enables many new business opportunities for our customers. Customers can also configure different data freshness thresholds based on their business needs. ByteHTAP also provides strong data consistency through global timestamps across its OLTP and OLAP system, which greatly relieves application developers from handling complex data consistency issues by themselves. In addition, we introduce some important performance optimizations to ByteHTAP, such as pushing computations to the storage layer and using delete bitmaps to efficiently handle deletes. Lastly, we will share our lessons and best practices in developing and running ByteHTAP in production. Jianjun Chen 0001, Yonghua Ding, Fangshi Li, Li Zhang 0132, Mingyi Zhang 0001, Kui Wei, Lixun Cao, Dan Zou, Yang Liu 0442, Lei Zhang 0213, Kai Wu 0004, Shangyu Luo, Jason Sun, Yuming Liang |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 6 |
| 2019 | Data Management at Huawei: Recent Accomplishments and Future ChallengesabstractHuawei is a leading global provider of information and communication technologies (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. With integrated solutions across four key domains: telecommunication networks, IT, smart devices, and cloud services, Huawei is committed to bringing digital transformation to every person, home and organization for a fully connected and intelligent world. Founded in 1987, Huawei currently has more than 180,000 employees, and operates in more than 170 countries and regions with revenue over 100 billion USD in 2018. Data management plays a key role in all of the four key domains above. We have developed innovative products and solutions to support rapid business growth driven by customer requirements. While many data management problems are common, each domain also has its own special requirements and challenges. In this paper, we will go through recent advancements in Huawei data management technologies including a petabyte scale enterprise analytics platform (FusionInsight MPPDB) and a highly available in-memory database for telecommunication networks (GMDB). In addition, we discuss data management challenges that we are facing in the areas of autonomous databases and device-edge-cloud collaboration data platforms. Jianjun Chen 0001, Zhibiao Chen, Ahmad Ghazal, Guoliang Li 0001, Sihao Li, Weijie Ou, Mingyi Zhang 0001, Minqi Zhou |
ICDE | 9 |
| 2018 | Workload Management in Database Management System: A Taxonomy (Extended Abstract)abstractWorkload management is the discipline of effectively monitoring, managing and controlling work flow across computing systems. In particular, workload management in database management systems (DBMSs) is the process or act of monitoring and controlling work (i.e., requests) executing on a database system in order to make efficient use of system resources in addition to achieving any performance objectives assigned to that work. In the past decade, workload management studies and practice have made considerable progress in both academia and industry. New techniques have been proposed by researchers, and new features of workload management facilities have been implemented in most commercial database products. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of workload management in today's DBMSs by developing a taxonomy of workload management techniques. We apply the taxonomy to evaluate and classify existing workload management techniques implemented in the commercial databases and available in the recent research literature. We also introduce the underlying principles of today's workload management technology for DBMSs, discuss open problems and outline some research opportunities in this research area. Mingyi Zhang 0001, Patrick Martin 0001, Wendy Powley, Jianjun Chen 0001 |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2018 | FusionInsight LibrA: Huawei's Enterprise Cloud Data Analytics PlatformabstractHuawei Fusion Insight Libr A (FI-MPPDB) is a petabyte scale enterprise analytics platform developed by the Huawei data-base group. It started as a prototype more than five years ago, and is now being used by many enterprise customers over the globe, including some of the world's largest financial institutions. Our product direction and enhancements have been mainly driven by customer requirements in the fast evolving Chinese market. This paper describes the architecture of FI-MPPDB and some of its major enhancements. In particular, we focus on top four requirements from our customers related to data analytics on the cloud: system availability, auto tuning, query over heterogeneous data models on the cloud, and the ability to utilize powerful modern hardware for good performance. We present our latest advancements in the above areas including online expansion, auto tuning in query optimizer, SQL on HDFS, and intelligent JIT compiled execution. Finally, we present some experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness of these technologies. Le Cai, Jianjun Chen 0001, Kuorong Chiang, Marko A. Dimitrijevic, Yonghua Ding, Ahmad Ghazal, Jacques Hebert, Kamini Jagtiani, Suzhen Lin, Demai Ni, Chunfeng Pei, Jason Sun, Li Zhang 0132, Mingyi Zhang 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 18 |
| 2018 | Workload Management in Database Management Systems: A TaxonomyabstractWorkload management is the discipline of effectively monitoring, managing and controlling work flow across computing systems. In particular, workload management in database management systems (DBMSs) is the process or act of monitoring and controlling work (i.e., requests) executing on a database system in order to make efficient use of system resources in addition to achieving any performance objectives assigned to that work. In the past decade, workload management studies and practice have made considerable progress in both academia and industry. New techniques have been proposed by researchers, and new features of workload management facilities have been implemented in most commercial database products. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of workload management in today's DBMSs by developing a taxonomy of workload management techniques. We apply the taxonomy to evaluate and classify existing workload management techniques implemented in the commercial databases and available in the recent research literature. We also introduce the underlying principles of today's workload management technology for DBMSs, discuss open problems, and outline some research opportunities in this research area. Mingyi Zhang 0001, Patrick Martin 0001, Wendy Powley, Jianjun Chen 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |