Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Loretta Guarino Reid

dblp:66/2478 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 91% User interface design and tools · 9%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 62% Distributed systems · 38%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology design
0.112009
Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009
Accessibility and assistive technology
screen reader accessibility
0.112009
Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009
Accessibility and assistive technology
web accessibility
0.112009
Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009
User interface design and tools
web applications
0.012009
Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world · WWW 2009
Operating systems › resource management › storage management
file systems
0.011983
A File System Supporting Cooperation between Programs · SOSP 1983
Storage systems
file systems
0.011983
A File System Supporting Cooperation between Programs · SOSP 1983
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.011983
A File System Supporting Cooperation between Programs · SOSP 1983
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
file sharing
0.011983
A File System Supporting Cooperation between Programs · SOSP 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user workflow design · 0.1usability research · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 AVA-Speech: A Densely Labeled Dataset of Speech Activity in Movies
abstract
Speech activity detection (or endpointing) is an important processing step for applications such as speech recognition, language identification and speaker diarization.Both audio-and vision-based approaches have been used for this task in various settings, often tailored toward end applications.However, much of the prior work reports results in synthetic settings, on taskspecific datasets, or on datasets that are not openly available.This makes it difficult to compare approaches and understand their strengths and weaknesses.In this paper, we describe a new dataset which we will release publicly containing densely labeled speech activity in YouTube videos 1 , with the goal of creating a shared, available dataset for this task.The labels in the dataset annotate three different speech activity conditions: clean speech, speech co-occurring with music, and speech cooccurring with noise, which enable analysis of model performance in more challenging conditions based on the presence of overlapping noise.We report benchmark performance numbers on AVA-Speech using off-the-shelf, state-of-the-art audio and vision models that serve as a baseline to facilitate future research.
Sourish Chaudhuri, Joseph Roth, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Andrew C. Gallagher, Liat Kaver, Radhika Marvin, Caroline Pantofaru, Nathan Reale, Loretta Guarino Reid, Kevin W. Wilson, Zhonghua Xi
INTERSPEECH9
2009 DTorial: An Interactive Tutorial Framework for Blind Users in a Web 2.0 World
Joshua M. Hailpern, Loretta Guarino Reid, Richard Boardman
INTERACT (1)2
2009 Web 2.0: blind to an accessible new world
abstract
With the advent of Web 2.0 technologies, websites have evolved from static pages to dynamic, interactive Web-based applications with the ability to replicate common desktop functionality. However, for blind and visually impaired individuals who rely upon screen readers, Web 2.0 applications force them to adapt to an inaccessible use model. Many technologies, including WAI-ARIA, AJAX, and improved screen reader support, are rapidly evolving to improve this situation. However, simply combining them does not solve the problems of screen reader users. The main contributions of this paper are two models of interaction for screen reader users, for both traditional websites and Web 2.0 applications. Further contributions are a discussion of accessibility difficulties screen reader users encounter when interacting with Web 2.0 applications, a user workflow design model for improving Web 2.0 accessibility, and a set of design requirements for developers to ease the user's burden and increase accessibility. These models, accessibility difficulties, and design implications are based directly on responses and lessons learned from usability research focusing on Web 2.0 usage and screen reader users. Without the conscious effort of Web engineers and designers, most blind and visually impaired users will shy away from using new Web 2.0 technology in favor of desktop based applications.
Joshua M. Hailpern, Loretta Guarino Reid, Richard Boardman, Srinivas Annam
WWW2
1983 A File System Supporting Cooperation between Programs
abstract
File systems coordinate simultaneous access of files by concurrent client processes. Although several processes may read a file simultaneously, the file system must grant exclusive access to one process wanting to write the file. Most file systems consider processes to be antagonistic: they prevent one process from taking actions on a file that have any chance to harm to another process already using the file. If several processes need to cooperate in a more sophisticated manner in their use of a file, they must communicate explicitly among themselves.
Loretta Guarino Reid, Philip L. Karlton
SOSP1