Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tuong-Vinh Truong
dblp:66/2642
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
bipartite ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A boosting algorithm for learning bipartite ranking functions with partially labeled data · SIGIR 2008 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A boosting algorithm for learning bipartite ranking functions with partially labeled data · SIGIR 2008 |
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
semi-supervised ranking |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | A boosting algorithm for learning bipartite ranking functions with partially labeled data · SIGIR 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised learning · 0.1boosting · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | A self-training method for learning to rank with unlabeled data
Tuong-Vinh Truong, Massih-Reza Amini, Patrick Gallinari |
ESANN | 1 |
| 2008 | A boosting algorithm for learning bipartite ranking functions with partially labeled dataabstractThis paper presents a boosting based algorithm for learning a bipartite ranking function (BRF) with partially labeled data. Until now different attempts had been made to build a BRF in a transductive setting, in which the test points are given to the methods in advance as unlabeled data. The proposed approach is a semi-supervised inductive ranking algorithm which, as opposed to transductive algorithms, is able to infer an ordering on new examples that were not used for its training. We evaluate our approach using the TREC-9 Ohsumed and the Reuters-21578 data collections, comparing against two semi-supervised classification algorithms for ROCArea (AUC), uninterpolated average precision (AUP), mean [email protected] (TP) and Precision-Recall (PR) curves. In the most interesting cases where there are an unbalanced number of irrelevant examples over relevant ones, we show our method to produce statistically significant improvements with respect to these ranking measures. Massih-Reza Amini, Tuong-Vinh Truong, Cyril Goutte |
SIGIR | 2 |