Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kenneth D. Wagner

dblp:66/345 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 8 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.031996
High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective · DAC 1996
Probability models for pseudorandom test sequences · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1988
Pseudorandom Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.031996
High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective · DAC 1996
Pseudorandom Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Probability models for pseudorandom test sequences · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1988
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.011996
High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective · DAC 1996
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
synthesis for testability
0.011996
High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective · DAC 1996
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
test synthesis
0.011996
High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective · DAC 1996
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › random testing
pseudorandom testing
0.021988
Probability models for pseudorandom test sequences · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1988
Pseudorandom Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault coverage
0.011987
Pseudorandom Testing · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.0linear feedback shift register · 0.0detectability profile analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Design for Testability Techniques at the Behavioral and Register-Transfer Levels
Sujit Dey, Anand Raghunathan, Kenneth D. Wagner
J. Electron. Test.3
1996 High-Level Synthesis for Testability: A Survey and Perspective
abstract
We review behavioral and RTL test synthesis and synthesis for testability approaches that generate easily testable implementations. We also include an overview of high-level synthesis techniques to assist high-level ATPG.
Kenneth D. Wagner, Sujit Dey
DAC1
1993 Testable Programmable Digital Clock Pulse Control Elements
abstract
Digital clock pulse control elements - delay lines and pulse-shaping elements - are used widely for clock generation and clock tuning in synchronous digital logic. However, they are intrinsically redundant circuits: without special modifications, DC logic testing cannot completely verify their static behavior (including the correct operation of the decoders and selectors used for their programming and control). This paper demonstrates low overhead circuit modification techniques that can be applied to all classes of programmable clock control elements, ensuring their complete single stuck-at fault testability.>
Kenneth D. Wagner, Bernd Könemann
ITC1
1991 Enhancing Board Functional Self-Test by Concurrent Sampling
abstract
Board test using functioiial self-test code can be augmented by concurrently sampling signals at chip boundaries, compressing this data, and verifying its signature in-line in the code. This is a general method to enhance board test and diagnosis, po1,erXtidy adding every chip J/O pin as an observation point that is observed frequently and coupled to the self-test. Tests continue to execute at the normal board operating speed. This combination of fnnctional and strudural testing offers improved effectiveness over functional testing alone.
Kenneth D. Wagner, Thomas W. Williams
ITC1
1988 Design for Testability of Mixed Signal Integrated Circuits
abstract
A starting point for a set of design for testability (DFT) principles that can be used with mixed signal integrated circuits is presented. The authors argue that an effective DFT technique should enhance the ability to perform digital signal processing and other modern test techniques on analog macros embedded in the integrated circuit, since quality will be a driving force with increasing integration. The proposed test methodology consists of (1) establishing the digital test model for testing of digital logic and (2) establishing the analog test mode and each of the submodes (called test configurations) for serial or parallel testing of analog partitions. Digital and analog circuitry must be isolated from each other, i.e. an uncontrolled analog signal must not be able to affect the digital test mode and vice versa.>
Kenneth D. Wagner, Thomas W. Williams
ITC1
1988 Probability models for pseudorandom test sequences
abstract
A probabilistic model for pseudorandom testing of combinational circuits is presented. The expected fault coverage is shown to be accurately approximated as a series of exponentials that depends on the test length and the fault detectabilities. The derivations do not require the pattern generator to have the same number of stages as there are network inputs.>
Edward J. McCluskey, Samy Makar, Samiha Mourad, Kenneth D. Wagner
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.4
1987 Pseudorandom Testing
abstract
Algorithmic test generation for high fault coverage is an expensive and time-consuming process. As an alternative, circuits can be tested by applying pseudorandom patterns generated by a linear feedback shift register (LFSR). Although no fault simulation is needed, analysis of pseudorandom testing requires the circuit detectability profile.
Kenneth D. Wagner, Cary K. Chin, Edward J. McCluskey
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1985 The Error Latency of Delay Faults in Combinational and Sequential Circuits
Kenneth D. Wagner
ITC1