Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias Broecheler
dblp:66/4756 · also Matthias Bröcheler
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 55% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 41% Graph learning · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Logic in computer science · 72% Computational complexity · 28% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Scaling MPE Inference for Constrained Continuous Markov Random Fields with Consensus Optimization · NIPS 2012 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.4 | 2 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 Computing Marginal Distributions over Continuous Markov Networks for Statistical Relational Learning · NIPS 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
hinge-loss markov random fields |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
probabilistic soft logic |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured models |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft Logic · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
most probable explanation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Scaling MPE Inference for Constrained Continuous Markov Random Fields with Consensus Optimization · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Scaling MPE Inference for Constrained Continuous Markov Random Fields with Consensus Optimization · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
collective classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Marginal Distributions over Continuous Markov Networks for Statistical Relational Learning · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Marginal Distributions over Continuous Markov Networks for Statistical Relational Learning · NIPS 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
normative reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Promises Kept, Promises Broken: An Axiomatic and Quantitative Treatment of Fulfillment · KR 2008 |
Logic in computer science › modal logic
deontic logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Promises Kept, Promises Broken: An Axiomatic and Quantitative Treatment of Fulfillment · KR 2008 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity
#p-hardness |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Computing Marginal Distributions over Continuous Markov Networks for Statistical Relational Learning · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parameter learning · 0.3message passing · 0.3convex inference · 0.3MAP inference · 0.3sampling · 0.2markov chain monte carlo · 0.2approximation scheme · 0.2piecewise-linear dependencies · 0.1linear constraints · 0.1consensus optimization · 0.1quantitative modeling · 0.1axiomatic analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Hinge-Loss Markov Random Fields and Probabilistic Soft LogicabstractA fundamental challenge in developing high-impact machine learning technologies is balancing the need to model rich, structured domains with the ability to scale to big data. Many important problem areas are both richly structured and large scale, from social and biological networks, to knowledge graphs and the Web, to images, video, and natural language. In this paper, we introduce two new formalisms for modeling structured data, and show that they can both capture rich structure and scale to big data. The first, hinge-loss Markov random fields (HL-MRFs), is a new kind of probabilistic graphical model that generalizes different approaches to convex inference. We unite three approaches from the randomized algorithms, probabilistic graphical models, and fuzzy logic communities, showing that all three lead to the same inference objective. We then define HL- MRFs by generalizing this unified objective. The second new formalism, probabilistic soft logic (PSL), is a probabilistic programming language that makes HL-MRFs easy to define using a syntax based on first-order logic. We introduce an algorithm for inferring most-probable variable assignments (MAP inference) that is much more scalable than general-purpose convex optimization methods, because it uses message passing to take advantage of sparse dependency structures. We then show how to learn the parameters of HL-MRFs. The learned HL-MRFs are as accurate as analogous discrete models, but much more scalable. Together, these algorithms enable HL-MRFs and PSL to model rich, structured data at scales not previously possible. Stephen H. Bach, Matthias Broecheler, Bert Huang, Lise Getoor |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2014 | Efficient Multiview Maintenance under Insertion in Huge Social NetworksabstractApplications to monitor various aspects of social networks are becoming increasingly popular. For instance, marketers want to look for semantic patterns relating to the content of tweets and Facebook posts relating to their products. Law enforcement agencies want to track behaviors involving potential criminals on the Internet by looking for certain patterns of behavior. Music companies want to track patterns of spread of illegal music. These applications allow multiple users to specify patterns of interest and monitor them in real time as new data gets added to the Web or to a social network. In this article we develop the concept of social network view servers in which all of these types of applications can be simultaneously monitored. The patterns of interest are expressed as views over an underlying graph or social network database. We show that a given set of views can be compiled in multiple possible ways to take advantage of common substructures and define the concept of an optimal merge . Though finding an optimal merge is shown to be NP-hard, we develop the AddView to find very good merges quickly. We develop a very fast MultiView algorithm that scalably and efficiently maintains multiple subgraph views when insertions are made to the social network database. We show that our algorithm is correct, study its complexity, and experimentally demonstrate that our algorithm can scalably handle updates to hundreds of views on 6 real-world social network databases with up to 540M edges. Andrea Pugliese 0001, Matthias Broecheler, V. S. Subrahmanian, Michael Ovelgönne |
ACM Trans. Web | 2 |
| 2013 | Using Generalized Annotated Programs to Solve Social Network Diffusion Optimization ProblemsabstractThere has been extensive work in many different fields on how phenomena of interest (e.g., diseases, innovation, product adoption) “diffuse” through a social network. As social networks increasingly become a fabric of society, there is a need to make “optimal” decisions with respect to an observed model of diffusion. For example, in epidemiology, officials want to find a set of k individuals in a social network which, if treated, would minimize spread of a disease. In marketing, campaign managers try to identify a set of k customers that, if given a free sample, would generate maximal “buzz” about the product. In this article, we first show that the well-known Generalized Annotated Program (GAP) paradigm can be used to express many existing diffusion models. We then define a class of problems called Social Network Diffusion Optimization Problems (SNDOPs). SNDOPs have four parts: (i) a diffusion model expressed as a GAP, (ii) an objective function we want to optimize with respect to a given diffusion model, (iii) an integer k > 0 describing resources (e.g., medication) that can be placed at nodes, (iv) a logical condition VC that governs which nodes can have a resource (e.g., only children above the age of 5 can be treated with a given medication). We study the computational complexity of SNDOPs and show both NP-completeness results as well as results on complexity of approximation. We then develop an exact and a heuristic algorithm to solve a large class of SNDOPproblems and show that our GREEDY-SNDOPs algorithm achieves the best possible approximation ratio that a polynomial algorithm can achieve (unless P = NP ). We conclude with a prototype experimental implementation to solve SNDOPs that looks at a real-world Wikipedia dataset consisting of over 103,000 edges. Paulo Shakarian, Matthias Broecheler, V. S. Subrahmanian, Cristian Molinaro |
ACM Trans. Comput. Log. | 2 |
| 2012 | Scaling MPE Inference for Constrained Continuous Markov Random Fields with Consensus OptimizationabstractProbabilistic graphical models are powerful tools for analyzing constrained, continuous domains. However, finding most-probable explanations (MPEs) in these models can be computationally expensive. In this paper, we improve the scalability of MPE inference in a class of graphical models with piecewise-linear and piecewise-quadratic dependencies and linear constraints over continuous domains. We derive algorithms based on a consensus-optimization framework and demonstrate their superior performance over state of the art. We show empirically that in a large-scale voter-preference modeling problem our algorithms scale linearly in the number of dependencies and constraints. Stephen H. Bach, Matthias Broecheler, Lise Getoor, Dianne P. O'Leary |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2011 | Probabilistic Subgraph Matching on Huge Social NetworksabstractUsers querying massive social networks or RDF databases are often not 100% certain about what they are looking for due to the complexity of the query or heterogeneity of the data. In this paper, we propose "probabilistic subgraph" (PS) queries over a graph/network database, which afford users great flexibility in specifying "approximately" what they are looking for. We formally define the probability that a substitution satisfies a PS-query with respect to a graph database. We then present the PMATCH algorithm to answer such queries and prove its correctness. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that PMATCH is efficient and scales to massive social networks with over a billion edges. Matthias Broecheler, Andrea Pugliese 0001, V. S. Subrahmanian |
ASONAM | 1 |
| 2010 | COSI: Cloud Oriented Subgraph Identification in Massive Social NetworksabstractSubgraph matching is a key operation on graph data. Social network (SN) providers may want to find all subgraphs within their social network that match certain query graph patterns. Unfortunately, subgraph matching is NP-complete, making its application to massive SNs a major challenge. Past work has shown how to implement subgraph matching on a single processor when the graph has 10-25M edges. In this paper, we show how to use cloud computing in conjunction with such existing single processor methods to efficiently match complex subgraphs on graphs as large as 778M edges. A cloud consists of one master compute node and k slave compute nodes. We first develop a probabilistic method to estimate probabilities that a vertex will be retrieved by a random query and that a pair of vertices will be successively retrieved by a random query. We use these probability estimates to define edge weights in an SN and to compute minimal edge cuts to partition the graph amongst k slave nodes. We develop algorithms for both master and slave nodes that try to minimize communication overhead. The resulting COSI system can answer complex queries over real-world SN data containing over 778M edges very efficiently. Matthias Broecheler, Andrea Pugliese 0001, V. S. Subrahmanian |
ASONAM | 1 |
| 2010 | Computing Marginal Distributions over Continuous Markov Networks for Statistical Relational LearningabstractContinuous Markov random fields are a general formalism to model joint probability distributions over events with continuous outcomes. We prove that marginal computation for constrained continuous MRFs is #P-hard in general and present a polynomial-time approximation scheme under mild assumptions on the structure of the random field. Moreover, we introduce a sampling algorithm to compute marginal distributions and develop novel techniques to increase its efficiency. Continuous MRFs are a general purpose probabilistic modeling tool and we demonstrate how they can be applied to statistical relational learning. On the problem of collective classification, we evaluate our algorithm and show that the standard deviation of marginals serves as a useful measure of confidence. Matthias Broecheler, Lise Getoor |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2010 | Probabilistic Similarity Logic
Matthias Broecheler, Lilyana Mihalkova, Lise Getoor |
UAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Using Histograms to Better Answer Queries to Probabilistic Logic Programs
Matthias Broecheler, Gerardo I. Simari, V. S. Subrahmanian |
ICLP | 1 |
| 2009 | DOGMA: A Disk-Oriented Graph Matching Algorithm for RDF Databases
Matthias Broecheler, Andrea Pugliese 0001, V. S. Subrahmanian |
ISWC | 1 |
| 2008 | Promises Kept, Promises Broken: An Axiomatic and Quantitative Treatment of Fulfillment
Gerardo I. Simari, Matthias Broecheler, V. S. Subrahmanian, Sarit Kraus |
KR | 2 |