Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bangping Wang
dblp:66/4799
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0204-4125ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
multi-agent policy gradient |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-Agents · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-Agents · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
automatic parameter tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-Agents · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Database system architecture and tuning
configuration tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-Agents · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Database system architecture and tuning
database tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-Agents · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic selection · 2.0multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient · 2.0deep deterministic policy gradient · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CMA+DB: How to Automatically Tune Database Parameters Through Collaborative Multi-AgentsabstractDatabase parameter automatic tuning is one of the challenging and difficult tasks that database administrators (DBAs) frequently encounter in artificial intelligence (AI) enabled database (DB) systems. Preferentially optimizing key parameters emerges as a critical point in addressing this issue, and it can help identify important parameters by exploring the interactions between parameters. Aiming to overcome the disadvantages of existing methods, we propose a collaborative multi-agents model called CMA+DB to automatically tune DB parameters in an effective and efficient fashion. CMA+DB integrates three components including SAPM (Single-Agent Pre-trained Model), MATM (Multi-Agent Joint Training Model), and PJTM (Probability-based Joint Training Model). SAPM applies the deep deterministic policy gradient to explore the impact of one single agent on DB performance, MATM uses multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradients to find agents that collaboratively work to improve DB performance, and PJTM can enhance parameter tuning by important agents based on a probabilistic selection factor. In the CMA+DB model, each agent is responsible for tuning a portion of the parameters, and multiple agents collaborate to recommend the optimal parameter configuration. This hybrid model can expand the number of tunable parameters in order to perform parameter tuning from the aspects of functions and parameter levels (i.e., global, DB, and session level). Experimental results reveal that CMA+DB obtains the fastest convergence performance (when reaching the largest throughput) of 14.83% faster than the state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in the TPC-C benchmark on average. Essentially, after the phase of SAPM model training, CMA+DB outperforms the performance of the SOTA models in throughput. Furthermore, DB performance of CMA+DB can be improved by 1.758% through the phases of MATM and PJTM model training. Shaojie Qiao, Rongmin Tang, Jiangmin Li, Yunjun Gao, Quanqing Xu, Nan Han, Bangping Wang, Guan Yuan, Xindong Wu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 7 |
| 2008 | Fuzzy-based algorithm for color recognition of license plates
Lichun Man, Bangping Wang, Yijun Xiao, Xiaochun Lu |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 3 |