Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian Riesenhuber
dblp:66/5384
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-5744-0408ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 71% 3D vision · 14% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007 Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
visual cortex |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
part-whole hierarchy |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Neural Models for Part-Whole Hierarchies · NIPS 1996 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge base |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Comprehensibility Improvement of Tabular Knowledge Bases · AAAI 1993 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
template matching · 0.1max pooling · 0.1hierarchical feature representation · 0.1cell tuning analysis · 0.0neural network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Perceptual category learning and visual processing: An exercise in computational cognitive neuroscience
George T. Cantwell, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Jessica L. Roeder, F. Gregory Ashby |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2007 | Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like MechanismsabstractWe introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating between a template matching and a maximum pooling operation. We demonstrate the strength of the approach on a range of recognition tasks: From invariant single object recognition in clutter to multiclass categorization problems and complex scene understanding tasks that rely on the recognition of both shape-based as well as texture-based objects. Given the biological constraints that the system had to satisfy, the approach performs surprisingly well: It has the capability of learning from only a few training examples and competes with state-of-the-art systems. We also discuss the existence of a universal, redundant dictionary of features that could handle the recognition of most object categories. In addition to its relevance for computer vision, the success of this approach suggests a plausibility proof for a class of feedforward models of object recognition in cortex. Thomas Serre, Lior Wolf, Stanley M. Bileschi, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso A. Poggio |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 1998 | Breaking Rotational Symmetry in a Self-Organizing Map-Model for Orientation Map DevelopmentabstractWe analyze the pattern formation behavior of a high&hyphendimensional self&hyphenorganizing map (SOM) model for the competitive projection of ON&hyphencenter&hyphentype and OFF&hyphencenter&hyphentype inputs to a common map layer. We mathematically show, and numerically confirm, that even isotropic stimuli can drive the development of oriented receptive fields and an orientation map in this model. This result provides an important missing link in the spectrum of pattern formation behaviors observed in SOM models. Extending the model by including further layers for binocular inputs, we also investigate the combined development of orientation and ocular dominance maps. A parameter region for combined patterns exists; corresponding maps show a preference for perpendicular intersection angles between iso&hyphenorientation lines and ocularity domain boundaries, consistent with experimental observations. Maximilian Riesenhuber, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Dirk Brockmann, Theo Geisel |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1997 | SOM-Model for the Development of Oriented Receptive Fields and Orientation Maps from Non-oriented ON-center OFF-center Inputs
Dirk Brockmann, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Theo Geisel |
ICANN | 3 |
| 1997 | Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso A. Poggio |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1996 | Analyzing the Formation of Structure in High-Dimensional Self-Organizing Maps Reveals Differences to Feature Map Models
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Theo Geisel |
ICANN | 1 |
| 1996 | Neural Models for Part-Whole Hierarchies
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Peter Dayan |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1993 | Comprehensibility Improvement of Tabular Knowledge Bases
Atsushi Sugiura, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Yoshiyuki Koseki |
AAAI | 2 |