Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maximilian Riesenhuber

dblp:66/5384 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-5744-0408ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 71% 3D vision · 14% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.122007
Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2007
Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.011997
Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
visual cortex
0.011997
Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
part-whole hierarchy
0.011996
Neural Models for Part-Whole Hierarchies · NIPS 1996
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge base
0.011993
Comprehensibility Improvement of Tabular Knowledge Bases · AAAI 1993
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance
0.011997
Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning · NIPS 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

template matching · 0.1max pooling · 0.1hierarchical feature representation · 0.1cell tuning analysis · 0.0neural network · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Perceptual category learning and visual processing: An exercise in computational cognitive neuroscience
George T. Cantwell, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Jessica L. Roeder, F. Gregory Ashby
Neural Networks2
2007 Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms
abstract
We introduce a new general framework for the recognition of complex visual scenes, which is motivated by biology: We describe a hierarchical system that closely follows the organization of visual cortex and builds an increasingly complex and invariant feature representation by alternating between a template matching and a maximum pooling operation. We demonstrate the strength of the approach on a range of recognition tasks: From invariant single object recognition in clutter to multiclass categorization problems and complex scene understanding tasks that rely on the recognition of both shape-based as well as texture-based objects. Given the biological constraints that the system had to satisfy, the approach performs surprisingly well: It has the capability of learning from only a few training examples and competes with state-of-the-art systems. We also discuss the existence of a universal, redundant dictionary of features that could handle the recognition of most object categories. In addition to its relevance for computer vision, the success of this approach suggests a plausibility proof for a class of feedforward models of object recognition in cortex.
Thomas Serre, Lior Wolf, Stanley M. Bileschi, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso A. Poggio
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
1998 Breaking Rotational Symmetry in a Self-Organizing Map-Model for Orientation Map Development
abstract
We analyze the pattern formation behavior of a high&hyphendimensional self&hyphenorganizing map (SOM) model for the competitive projection of ON&hyphencenter&hyphentype and OFF&hyphencenter&hyphentype inputs to a common map layer. We mathematically show, and numerically confirm, that even isotropic stimuli can drive the development of oriented receptive fields and an orientation map in this model. This result provides an important missing link in the spectrum of pattern formation behaviors observed in SOM models. Extending the model by including further layers for binocular inputs, we also investigate the combined development of orientation and ocular dominance maps. A parameter region for combined patterns exists; corresponding maps show a preference for perpendicular intersection angles between iso&hyphenorientation lines and ocularity domain boundaries, consistent with experimental observations.
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Dirk Brockmann, Theo Geisel
Neural Comput.1
1997 SOM-Model for the Development of Oriented Receptive Fields and Orientation Maps from Non-oriented ON-center OFF-center Inputs
Dirk Brockmann, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Theo Geisel
ICANN3
1997 Just One View: Invariances in Inferotemporal Cell Tuning
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Tomaso A. Poggio
NIPS1
1996 Analyzing the Formation of Structure in High-Dimensional Self-Organizing Maps Reveals Differences to Feature Map Models
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Hans-Ulrich Bauer, Theo Geisel
ICANN1
1996 Neural Models for Part-Whole Hierarchies
Maximilian Riesenhuber, Peter Dayan
NIPS1
1993 Comprehensibility Improvement of Tabular Knowledge Bases
Atsushi Sugiura, Maximilian Riesenhuber, Yoshiyuki Koseki
AAAI2