Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristina Boicu

dblp:66/5459 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 92% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 8%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge base
knowledge base refinement
0.112005
Rule Refinement by Domain Experts in Complex Knowledge Bases · AAAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › rule learning
rule refinement
0.112005
Rule Refinement by Domain Experts in Complex Knowledge Bases · AAAI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reasoning · 0.1learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Learning complex problem solving expertise from failures
abstract
Our research addresses the issue of developing knowledge-based agents that capture and use the problem solving knowledge of subject matter experts from diverse application domains. This paper emphasizes the use of negative examples in agent learning by presenting several strategies for capturing expert's knowledge when the agent fails to correctly solve a problem. These strategies have been implemented into the disciple learning agent shell and used in complex application domains such as intelligence analysis, center of gravity determination, and emergency response planning.
Cristina Boicu, Gheorghe Tecuci, Mihai Boicu
ICMLA1
2006 Lazy Rule Refinement by Knowledge-Based Agents
abstract
This paper presents recent results on developing learning agents that can be taught by subject matter experts how to solve problems, through examples and explanations. It introduces the lazy rule refinement method where the expert modifies an example generated by a learned rule. In this case the agent has to decide whether to modify the rule (if the modification applies to all the previous positive examples) or to learn a new rule. However, checking the previous examples would be disruptive or even impossible. The lazy rule refinement method provides an elegant solution to this problem, in which the agent delays the decision whether to modify the rule or to learn a new rule until it accumulated enough examples during the follow-on problem solving process. This method has been incorporated into the disciple learning agent shell and used in the complex application areas of center of gravity analysis and intelligence analysis
Cristina Boicu, Gheorghe Tecuci, Mihai Boicu
ICMLA1
2005 A Learning and Reasoning System for Intelligence Analysis
Mihai Boicu, Gheorghe Tecuci, Cindy Ayers, Dorin Marcu, Cristina Boicu, Marcel Barbulescu, Bogdan Stanescu, William Wagner, Vu Le 0003, Denitsa Apostolova, Adrian Ciubotariu
AAAI5
2005 Rule Refinement by Domain Experts in Complex Knowledge Bases
Cristina Boicu, Gheorghe Tecuci, Mihai Boicu
AAAI1
2005 The Disciple-RKF Learning and Reasoning Agent
abstract
Over the years we have developed the Disciple theory, methodology, and family of tools for building knowledge-based agents. This approach consists of developing an agent shell that can be taught directly by a subject matter expert in a way that resembles how the expert would teach a human apprentice when solving problems in cooperation. This paper presents the most recent version of the Disciple approach and its implementation in the Disciple–RKF (rapid knowledge formation) system. Disciple–RKF is based on mixed-initiative problem solving, where the expert solves the more creative parts of the problem and the agent solves the more routine ones, integrated teaching and learning, where the agent helps the expert to teach it, by asking relevant questions, and the expert helps the agent to learn, by providing examples, hints, and explanations, and multistrategy learning, where the agent integrates multiple learning strategies, such as learning from examples, learning from explanations, and learning by analogy, to learn from the expert how to solve problems. Disciple–RKF has been applied to build learning and reasoning agents for military center of gravity analysis, which are used in several courses at the US Army War College.
Gheorghe Tecuci, Mihai Boicu, Cristina Boicu, Dorin Marcu, Bogdan Stanescu, Marcel Barbulescu
Comput. Intell.3
2004 Parallel Knowledge Base Development by Subject Matter Experts
Gheorghe Tecuci, Mihai Boicu, Dorin Marcu, Bogdan Stanescu, Cristina Boicu, Marcel Barbulescu
EKAW5