Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew Frampton

dblp:66/5646 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-2345-0966ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 48% Speech recognition and synthesis · 26% Information extraction and text analysis · 26%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition › multi-speaker speech recognition
meeting transcription
0.112010
The CALO Meeting Assistant System · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2010
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-party dialogue
0.112009
Real-time decision detection in multi-party dialogue · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
strategy learning
0.112006
Learning More Effective Dialogue Strategies Using Limited Dialogue Move Features · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › human-computer dialogue
real-time conversation
0.012009
Real-time decision detection in multi-party dialogue · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
spoken dialogue systems
0.012006
Learning More Effective Dialogue Strategies Using Limited Dialogue Move Features · ACL 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic identification · 0.1summarization · 0.1speech recognition · 0.1user simulation · 0.1reinforcement learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Detection of time-pressure induced stress in speech via acoustic indicators
Matthew Frampton, Sandeep Sripada, Ricardo Augusto Hoffmann Bion, Stanley Peters
SIGDIAL Conference1
2010 The CALO Meeting Assistant System
abstract
The CALO Meeting Assistant (MA) provides for distributed meeting capture, annotation, automatic transcription and semantic analysis of multiparty meetings, and is part of the larger CALO personal assistant system. This paper presents the CALO-MA architecture and its speech recognition and understanding components, which include real-time and offline speech transcription, dialog act segmentation and tagging, topic identification and segmentation, question-answer pair identification, action item recognition, decision extraction, and summarization.
Gökhan Tür, Andreas Stolcke, L. Lynn Voss, Stanley Peters, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, John Dowding, Benoît Favre, Raquel Fernández, Matthew Frampton, Michael W. Frandsen, Clint Frederickson, Martin Graciarena, Donald Kintzing, Kyle Leveque, Shane Mason, John Niekrasz, Matthew Purver, Korbinian Riedhammer, Elizabeth Shriberg, Jing Tien, Dimitra Vergyri
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.9
2009 Who is "You"? Combining Linguistic and Gaze Features to Resolve Second-Person References in Dialogue
Matthew Frampton, Raquel Fernández, Patrick Ehlen, C. Mario Christoudias, Trevor Darrell, Stanley Peters
EACL1
2009 Real-time decision detection in multi-party dialogue
Matthew Frampton, Trung H. Bui, Stanley Peters
EMNLP1
2009 Extracting Decisions from Multi-Party Dialogue Using Directed Graphical Models and Semantic Similarity
Trung H. Bui, Matthew Frampton, John Dowding, Stanley Peters
SIGDIAL Conference2
2009 Cascaded Lexicalised Classifiers for Second-Person Reference Resolution
Matthew Purver, Raquel Fernández, Matthew Frampton, Stanley Peters
SIGDIAL Conference3
2008 Using dialogue acts to learn better repair strategies for spoken dialogue systems
abstract
Repair or error-recovery strategies are an important design issue in spoken dialogue systems (SDSs) - how to conduct the dialogue when there is no progress (e.g. due to repeated ASR errors). Nearly all current SDSs use hand-crafted repair rules, but a more robust approach is to use reinforcement learning (RL) for data-driven dialogue strategy learning. However, as well as usually being tested only in simulation, current RL approaches use small state spaces which do not contain linguistically motivated features such as "dialogue acts" (DAs). We show that a strategy learned with DA features outperforms hand-crafted and slot-status strategies when tested with real users (+9% average task completion, p < 0.05). We then explore how using DAs produces better repair strategies e.g. focus-switching. We show that DAs are useful in de.ciding both when to use a repair strategy, and which one to use.
Matthew Frampton, Oliver Lemon
ICASSP1
2008 Identifying relevant phrases to summarize decisions in spoken meetings
abstract
We address the problem of identifying words and phrases that accurately capture, or contribute to, the semantic gist of decisions made in multi-party human-human meetings. We first describe our approach to modelling decision discussions in spoken meetings and then compare two approaches to extracting information from these discussions. The first one uses an opendomain semantic parser that identifies candidate phrases for decision summaries and then employs machine learning techniques to select from those candidate phrases. The second one uses categorical and sequential classifiers that exploit simple syntactic and semantic features to identify words and phrases relevant for decision summarization.
Raquel Fernández, Matthew Frampton, John Dowding, Anish Adukuzhiyil, Patrick Ehlen, Stanley Peters
INTERSPEECH2
2008 The CALO meeting speech recognition and understanding system
abstract
The CALO Meeting Assistant provides for distributed meeting capture, annotation, automatic transcription and semantic analysis of multiparty meetings, and is part of the larger CALO personal assistant system. This paper summarizes the CALO-MA architecture and its speech recognition and understanding components, which include real-time and offline speech transcription, dialog act segmentation and tagging, question-answer pair identification, action item recognition, decision extraction, and summarization.
Gökhan Tür, Andreas Stolcke, L. Lynn Voss, John Dowding, Benoît Favre, Raquel Fernández, Matthew Frampton, Michael W. Frandsen, Clint Frederickson, Martin Graciarena, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Donald Kintzing, Kyle Leveque, Shane Mason, John Niekrasz, Stanley Peters, Matthew Purver, Korbinian Riedhammer, Elizabeth Shriberg, Jing Tien, Dimitra Vergyri
SLT7
2006 Learning More Effective Dialogue Strategies Using Limited Dialogue Move Features
abstract
We explore the use of restricted dialogue contexts in reinforcement learning (RL) of effective dialogue strategies for information seeking spoken dialogue systems (e.g. COMMUNICATOR (Walker et al., 2001)). The contexts we use are richer than previous research in this area, e.g. (Levin and Pieraccini, 1997; Scheffler and Young, 2001; Singh et al., 2002; Pietquin, 2004), which use only slot-based information, but are much less complex than the full dialogue "Information States" explored in (Henderson et al., 2005), for which tractabe learning is an issue. We explore how incrementally adding richer features allows learning of more effective dialogue strategies. We use 2 user simulations learned from COMMUNICATOR data (Walker et al., 2001; Georgila et al., 2005b) to explore the effects of different features on learned dialogue strategies. Our results show that adding the dialogue moves of the last system and user turns increases the average reward of the automatically learned strategies by 65.9% over the original (hand-coded) COMMUNICATOR systems, and by 7.8% over a baseline RL policy that uses only slot-status features. We show that the learned strategies exhibit an emergent "focus switching" strategy and effective use of the 'give help' action.
Matthew Frampton, Oliver Lemon
ACL1