Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephan Swiderski
dblp:66/5716
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 67% Program verification · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
functional programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Automated termination proofs for haskell by term rewriting · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2011 |
Program verification
termination analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Automated termination proofs for haskell by term rewriting · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2011 |
Programming languages and type systems
term rewriting |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Automated termination proofs for haskell by term rewriting · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
term rewriting · 0.1size-change graphs · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Proving Termination by Dependency Pairs and Inductive Theorem Proving
Carsten Fuhs, Jürgen Giesl, Michael Parting, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Stephan Swiderski |
J. Autom. Reason. | 5 |
| 2011 | Automated termination proofs for haskell by term rewritingabstractThere are many powerful techniques for automated termination analysis of term rewriting. However, up to now they have hardly been used for real programming languages. We present a new approach which permits the application of existing techniques from term rewriting to prove termination of most functions defined in Haskell programs. In particular, we show how termination techniques for ordinary rewriting can be used to handle those features of Haskell which are missing in term rewriting (e.g., lazy evaluation, polymorphic types, and higher-order functions). We implemented our results in the termination prover AProVE and successfully evaluated them on existing Haskell libraries. Jürgen Giesl, Matthias Raffelsieper, Peter Schneider-Kamp, Stephan Swiderski, René Thiemann |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 4 |
| 2009 | Termination Analysis by Dependency Pairs and Inductive Theorem Proving
Stephan Swiderski, Michael Parting, Jürgen Giesl, Carsten Fuhs, Peter Schneider-Kamp |
CADE | 1 |
| 2007 | Proving Termination by Bounded Increase
Jürgen Giesl, René Thiemann, Stephan Swiderski, Peter Schneider-Kamp |
CADE | 3 |
| 2006 | Automated Termination Analysis for Haskell: From Term Rewriting to Programming Languages
Jürgen Giesl, Stephan Swiderski, Peter Schneider-Kamp, René Thiemann |
RTA | 2 |