Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Dorothy Andrews

dblp:66/6184 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 77% Performance modeling and evaluation · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems
operating system reliability		 0.011987
On the Reliability of the IBM MVS/XA Operating · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1987
Distributed systems
fault tolerance		 0.011987
On the Reliability of the IBM MVS/XA Operating · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1987
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization		 0.011987
On the Reliability of the IBM MVS/XA Operating · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

field data analysis · 0.0error classification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 On the Reliability of the IBM MVS/XA Operating
abstract
This paper describes an analysis of system-detected errors on the MVS operating system under the eXtended Architecture (XA) for two IBM 3081 systems. The analysis classifies the errors in categories and examines the effectiveness of the recovery system of the MVS/XA. Comparison of the results for the two IBM 3081's confirm the dependence of the error distribution on the type of system utilization. The results for one of the machines are compared to those obtained for the same system when operating under MVS/SP. The comparison of the MVS/XA to the MVS/SP reveals the following: more addressing errors, a better error recording system and improved reliability and fault tolerance.
Samiha Mourad, Dorothy Andrews
 IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2