Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Navneet Malpani

dblp:66/6567 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Distributed computing theory · 100%
Computer networks
2 papers
Routing and switching · 66% Wireless networking · 34%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory › self-stabilization
token circulation
0.122005
Distributed Token Circulation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2005
Distributed Token Circulation on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · ICNP 2001
Routing and switching
ad hoc network routing
0.012001
Distributed Token Circulation on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · ICNP 2001
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks
0.012005
Distributed Token Circulation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2005
Distributed systems
group communication
0.012005
Distributed Token Circulation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2005
Distributed systems › group communication
total order delivery
0.012005
Distributed Token Circulation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2worst-case analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Distributed Token Circulation in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
abstract
This paper presents several distributed algorithms that cause a token to continually circulate through all the nodes of a mobile ad hoc network. An important application of such algorithms is to ensure total order of message, delivery in a group communication service. Some of the proposed algorithms are aware of, and adapt to changes in the ad hoc network topology. When using a token circulation algorithm, a round is said to complete when every node has been visited at least once. Criteria for comparing the algorithms include the average time, required to complete a round, number of bytes sent per round, and number of nodes visited per round. Comparison between the proposed algorithms is performed using simulation results obtained from a detailed simulation model (with ns-2 simulator). We also give a rigorous worst-case analysis of the proposed LR algorithm, which gives the best overall performance in the simulation.
Navneet Malpani, Yu Chen 0017, Nitin H. Vaidya, Jennifer L. Welch
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1
2002 A note on practical construction of maximum bandwidth paths
Navneet Malpani, Jianer Chen
Inf. Process. Lett.1
2001 Distributed Token Circulation on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
abstract
This paper presents several distributed algorithms that cause a token to continually circulate through all the nodes of a mobile ad hoc network. An important application of such algorithms is to ensure total order of message delivery in a group communication service. Some of the proposed algorithms are aware of, and adapt to changes in, the ad hoc network topology. When using a token circulation algorithm, a round is, said to complete when every node has been visited at least once. Criteria for comparing the algorithms include the average time required to complete a round, number of bytes sent per round, and number of nodes visited per round. Comparison between the proposed algorithms is performed using simulation results obtained from a detailed simulation model (with ns-2 simulator).
Navneet Malpani, Nitin H. Vaidya, Jennifer L. Welch
ICNP1