Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Naoum Naoumov

dblp:66/7 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 77% Content delivery and video streaming · 23%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
peer-to-peer network measurement
0.112006
The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File Sharing Systems · INFOCOM 2006
Network security › peer-to-peer network security
peer-to-peer network attack
0.112006
The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File Sharing Systems · INFOCOM 2006
Content delivery and video streaming
peer-to-peer file sharing
0.012006
The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File Sharing Systems · INFOCOM 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data harvesting · 0.1blacklisting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 The Index Poisoning Attack in P2P File Sharing Systems
abstract
Abstract — P2P file-sharing systems have indexes, which users search to find locations of desired titles. In the index poisoning attack, the attacker inserts massive numbers of bogus records into the index for a set of targeted titles. As a result, when a user searches for a targeted title, the index returns bogus results, such as bogus file identifiers, bogus IP addresses, or bogus port numbers. In this paper we first show that both structured and unstructured P2P file-sharing systems are highly vulnerable to the index poisoning attack. We then develop a novel and efficient methodology for estimating index poisoning levels and pollution levels in file-sharing systems. The methodology is efficient in that involves neither the downloading nor the analysis of binary content files. We deploy data-harvesting platforms for FastTrack, an unstructured file-sharing system, and Overnet, a DHT-based file-sharing system. Applying our methodology to harvested data, we find that index poisoning is pervasive in both systems. We also outline a distributed blacklisting procedure for countering the index poisoning and pollution attacks. I.
Naoum Naoumov, Keith W. Ross
INFOCOM2