Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick O. Perry

dblp:66/8000 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 67% Mathematical optimization · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
eigenvector computation
0.112011
Regularized Laplacian Estimation and Fast Eigenvector Approximation · NIPS 2011
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.112011
Regularized Laplacian Estimation and Fast Eigenvector Approximation · NIPS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical regularization · 0.1diffusion-based pagerank · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Regularized Laplacian Estimation and Fast Eigenvector Approximation
abstract
Recently, Mahoney and Orecchia demonstrated that popular diffusion-based procedures to compute a quick approximation to the first nontrivial eigenvector of a data graph Laplacian exactly solve certain regularized Semi-Definite Programs (SDPs). In this paper, we extend that result by providing a statistical interpretation of their approximation procedure. Our interpretation will be analogous to the manner in which l2-regularized or l1-regularized l2 regression (often called Ridge regression and Lasso regression, respectively) can be interpreted in terms of a Gaussian prior or a Laplace prior, respectively, on the coefficient vector of the regression problem. Our framework will imply that the solutions to the Mahoney-Orecchia regularized SDP can be interpreted as regularized estimates of the pseudoinverse of the graph Laplacian. Conversely, it will imply that the solution to this regularized estimation problem can be computed very quickly by running, e.g., the fast diffusion-based PageRank procedure for computing an approximation to the first nontrivial eigenvector of the graph Laplacian. Empirical results are also provided to illustrate the manner in which approximate eigenvector computation implicitly performs statistical regularization, relative to running the corresponding exact algorithm.
Patrick O. Perry, Michael W. Mahoney
NIPS1
2010 A Rotation Test to Verify Latent Structure
Patrick O. Perry, Art B. Owen
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1