Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuanshan Wu
dblp:66/8555
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
model averaging |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Functional Martingale Residual Process for High-Dimensional Cox Regression with Model Averaging · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › survival analysis
cox regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Functional Martingale Residual Process for High-Dimensional Cox Regression with Model Averaging · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Functional Martingale Residual Process for High-Dimensional Cox Regression with Model Averaging · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
martingale residual process · 0.9greedy algorithm · 0.9cross-validation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Distributed quantile regression for massive heterogeneous data
Aijun Hu, Yuling Jiao, Yueyong Shi, Yuanshan Wu |
Neurocomputing | 5 |
| 2020 | Functional Martingale Residual Process for High-Dimensional Cox Regression with Model AveragingabstractRegularization methods for the Cox proportional hazards regression with high-dimensional survival data have been studied extensively in the literature. However, if the model is misspecified, this would result in misleading statistical inference and prediction. To enhance the prediction accuracy for the relative risk and the survival probability, we propose three model averaging approaches for the high-dimensional Cox proportional hazards regression. Based on the martingale residual process, we define the delete-one cross-validation (CV) process, and further propose three novel CV functionals, including the end-time CV, integrated CV, and supremum CV, to achieve more accurate prediction for the risk quantities of clinical interest. The optimal weights for candidate models, without the constraint of summing up to one, can be obtained by minimizing these functionals, respectively. The proposed model averaging approach can attain the lowest possible prediction loss asymptotically. Furthermore, we develop a greedy model averaging algorithm to overcome the computational obstacle when the dimension is high. The performances of the proposed model averaging procedures are evaluated via extensive simulation studies, demonstrating that our methods achieve superior prediction accuracy over the existing regularization methods. As an illustration, we apply the proposed methods to the mantle cell lymphoma study. Baihua He, Yuanshan Wu, Guosheng Yin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |