Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou
dblp:66/9779
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
genealogical inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
association analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linkage information · 0.1classification with rotations · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMapabstractMOTIVATION: Accurate inference of genealogical relationships between pairs of individuals is paramount in association studies, forensics and evolutionary analyses of wildlife populations. Current methods for relationship inference consider only a small set of close relationships and have limited to no power to distinguish between relationships with the same number of meioses separating the individuals under consideration (e.g. aunt-niece versus niece-aunt or first cousins versus great aunt-niece). RESULTS: We present CARROT (ClAssification of Relationships with ROTations), a novel framework for relationship inference that leverages linkage information to differentiate between rotated relationships, that is, between relationships with the same number of common ancestors and the same number of meioses separating the individuals under consideration. We demonstrate that CARROT clearly outperforms existing methods on simulated data. We also applied CARROT on four populations from Phase III of the HapMap Project and detected previously unreported pairs of third- and fourth-degree relatives. AVAILABILITY: Source code for CARROT is freely available at http://carrot.stanford.edu. CONTACT: [email protected]. Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou, Dorna Kashef Haghighi, Sarah J. Aerni, Andreas Sundquist, Sivan Bercovici, Serafim Batzoglou |
Bioinform. | 1 |