EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohammad J. Saberian
dblp:66/9988 · also Mohammad Javad Saberian
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
10as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 9 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
14 papers |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28% Image recognition and object detection · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
1.6 | 8 | 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Large Margin Discriminant Dimensionality Reduction in Prediction Space · NIPS 2016 Boosting algorithms for detector cascade learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › boosting
multiclass boosting |
0.7 | 3 | 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Guess-Averse Loss Functions For Cost-Sensitive Multiclass Boosting · ICML 2014 Multiclass Boosting: Theory and Algorithms · NIPS 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Pedestrian Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Deep Pedestrian Detection · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.6 | 2 | 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Guess-Averse Loss Functions For Cost-Sensitive Multiclass Boosting · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hashing
deep hashing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Hashing with Hash-Consistent Large Margin Proxy Embeddings · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
embedding learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Hashing with Hash-Consistent Large Margin Proxy Embeddings · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Hashing with Hash-Consistent Large Margin Proxy Embeddings · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
cascaded detection |
0.5 | 3 | 2015 | Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Deep Pedestrian Detection · ICCV 2015 Learning Optimal Embedded Cascades · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 Boosting Classifier Cascades · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Pedestrian Detection · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.4 | 3 | 2015 | Boosting algorithms for detector cascade learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 Learning Optimal Embedded Cascades · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Deep Pedestrian Detection · ICCV 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
margin-based loss |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
cascade classifier |
0.3 | 2 | 2014 | Boosting algorithms for detector cascade learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014 Boosting Classifier Cascades · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Large Margin Discriminant Dimensionality Reduction in Prediction Space · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
discriminative dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Large Margin Discriminant Dimensionality Reduction in Prediction Space · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › cost-sensitive learning
cost-sensitive classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Guess-Averse Loss Functions For Cost-Sensitive Multiclass Boosting · ICML 2014 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
multi-class object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multi-Resolution Cascades for Multiclass Object Detection · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Multiclass Semi-Supervised Boosting Using Similarity Learning · ICDM 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › semi-supervised classification
multiclass semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Multiclass Semi-Supervised Boosting Using Similarity Learning · ICDM 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Multiclass Semi-Supervised Boosting Using Similarity Learning · ICDM 2013 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › boosting
margin boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | TaylorBoost: First and second-order boosting algorithms with explicit margin control · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
margin theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Multiclass Boosting: Theory and Algorithms · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | TaylorBoost: First and second-order boosting algorithms with explicit margin control · CVPR 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Multiclass Boosting: Theory and Algorithms · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and Algorithms · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › classifier combination
boosting cascade |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Boosting Classifier Cascades · NIPS 2010 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
audio watermarking |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Robust Audio Data Hiding Using Correlated Quantization With Histogram-Based Detector · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2009 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
quantization index modulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Robust Audio Data Hiding Using Correlated Quantization With Histogram-Based Detector · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2009 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Optimal Embedded Cascades · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
information hiding |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Robust Audio Data Hiding Using Correlated Quantization With Histogram-Based Detector · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
boosting · 1.5lagrangian optimization · 0.7gradient descent · 0.5coordinate descent · 0.5proxy embedding · 0.5deep hashing · 0.5object proposal · 0.4large margin · 0.2SVM · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2point-to-point graph · 0.1histogram-based detection · 0.1correlated quantization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Deep Hashing with Hash-Consistent Large Margin Proxy Embeddings
Pedro Morgado 0001, Yunsheng Li, José Costa Pereira, Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 4 |
| 2020 | Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Pedestrian DetectionabstractThe problem of pedestrian detection is considered. The design of complexity-aware cascaded pedestrian detectors, combining features of very different complexities, is investigated. A new cascade design procedure is introduced, by formulating cascade learning as the Lagrangian optimization of a risk that accounts for both accuracy and complexity. A boosting algorithm, denoted as complexity aware cascade training (CompACT), is then derived to solve this optimization. CompACT cascades are shown to seek an optimal trade-off between accuracy and complexity by pushing features of higher complexity to the later cascade stages, where only a few difficult candidate patches remain to be classified. This enables the use of features of vastly different complexities in a single detector. In result, the feature pool can be expanded to features previously impractical for cascade design, such as the responses of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). This is demonstrated through the design of pedestrian detectors with a pool of features whose complexities span orders of magnitude. The resulting cascade generalizes the combination of a CNN with an object proposal mechanism: rather than a pre-processing stage, CompACT cascades seamlessly integrate CNNs in their stages. This enables accurate detection at fairly fast speeds. Zhaowei Cai, Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2019 | Multiclass Boosting: Margins, Codewords, Losses, and AlgorithmsabstractThe problem of multiclass boosting is considered. A new formulation is presented, combining multi-dimensional predictors, multi-dimensional real-valued codewords, and proper multiclass margin loss functions. This leads to a number of contributions, such as maximum capacity codeword sets, a family of proper and margin enforcing losses, denoted as $\gamma-\phi$ losses, and two new multiclass boosting algorithms. These are descent procedures on the functional space spanned by a set of weak learners. The first, CD-MCBoost, is a coordinate descent procedure that updates one predictor component at a time. The second, GD-MCBoost, a gradient descent procedure that updates all components jointly. Both MCBoost algorithms are defined with respect to a $\gamma-\phi$ loss and can reduce to classical boosting procedures (such as AdaBoost and LogitBoost) for binary problems. Beyond the algorithms themselves, the proposed formulation enables a unified treatment of many previous multiclass boosting algorithms. This is used to show that the latter implement different combinations of optimization strategy, codewords, weak learners, and loss function, highlighting some of their deficiencies. It is shown that no previous method matches the support of MCBoost for real codewords of maximum capacity, a proper margin-enforcing loss function, and any family of multidimensional predictors and weak learners. Experimental results confirm the superiority of MCBoost, showing that the two proposed MCBoost algorithms outperform comparable prior methods on a number of datasets.\\ \\ \textbf{Keywords}: Boosting, Multiclass Boosting, Multiclass Classification, Margin Maximization, Loss Function. Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | Boosted Convolutional Neural Networks
Mohammad Moghimi, Serge J. Belongie, Mohammad J. Saberian, Jian Yang 0003, Nuno Vasconcelos, Li-Jia Li 0001 |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2016 | Large Margin Discriminant Dimensionality Reduction in Prediction SpaceabstractIn this paper we establish a duality between boosting and SVM, and use this to derive a novel discriminant dimensionality reduction algorithm. In particular, using the multiclass formulation of boosting and SVM we note that both use a combination of mapping and linear classification to maximize the multiclass margin. In SVM this is implemented using a pre-defined mapping (induced by the kernel) and optimizing the linear classifiers. In boosting the linear classifiers are pre-defined and the mapping (predictor) is learned through combination of weak learners. We argue that the intermediate mapping, e.g. boosting predictor, is preserving the discriminant aspects of the data and by controlling the dimension of this mapping it is possible to achieve discriminant low dimensional representations for the data. We use the aforementioned duality and propose a new method, Large Margin Discriminant Dimensionality Reduction (LADDER) that jointly learns the mapping and the linear classifiers in an efficient manner. This leads to a data-driven mapping which can embed data into any number of dimensions. Experimental results show that this embedding can significantly improve performance on tasks such as hashing and image/scene classification. Mohammad J. Saberian, José Costa Pereira, Nuno Vasconcelos |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2015 | Learning Complexity-Aware Cascades for Deep Pedestrian DetectionabstractThe design of complexity-aware cascaded detectors, combining features of very different complexities, is considered. A new cascade design procedure is introduced, by formulating cascade learning as the Lagrangian optimization of a risk that accounts for both accuracy and complexity. A boosting algorithm, denoted as complexity aware cascade training (CompACT), is then derived to solve this optimization. CompACT cascades are shown to seek an optimal trade-off between accuracy and complexity by pushing features of higher complexity to the later cascade stages, where only a few difficult candidate patches remain to be classified. This enables the use of features of vastly different complexities in a single detector. In result, the feature pool can be expanded to features previously impractical for cascade design, such as the responses of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). This is demonstrated through the design of a pedestrian detector with a pool of features whose complexities span orders of magnitude. The resulting cascade generalizes the combination of a CNN with an object proposal mechanism: rather than a pre-processing stage, CompACT cascades seamlessly integrate CNNs in their stages. This enables state of the art performance on the Caltech and KITTI datasets, at fairly fast speeds. Zhaowei Cai, Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2015 | Multi-view Face Detection Using Deep Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractIn this paper we consider the problem of multi-view face detection. While there has been significant research on this problem, current state-of-the-art approaches for this task require annotation of facial landmarks, e.g. TSM [25], or annotation of face poses [28, 22]. They also require training dozens of models to fully capture faces in all orientations, e.g. 22 models in HeadHunter method [22]. In this paper we propose Deep Dense Face Detector (DDFD), a method that does not require pose/landmark annotation and is able to detect faces in a wide range of orientations using a single model based on deep convolutional neural networks. The proposed method has minimal complexity; unlike other recent deep learning object detection methods [9], it does not require additional components such as segmentation, bounding-box regression, or SVM classifiers. Furthermore, we analyzed scores of the proposed face detector for faces in different orientations and found that 1) the proposed method is able to detect faces from different angles and can handle occlusion to some extent, 2) there seems to be a correlation between distribution of positive examples in the training set and scores of the proposed face detector. The latter suggests that the proposed method's performance can be further improved by using better sampling strategies and more sophisticated data augmentation techniques. Evaluations on popular face detection benchmark datasets show that our single-model face detector algorithm has similar or better performance compared to the previous methods, which are more complex and require annotations of either different poses or facial landmarks. Sachin Sudhakar Farfade, Mohammad J. Saberian, Li-Jia Li 0001 |
ICMR | 2 |
| 2014 | Guess-Averse Loss Functions For Cost-Sensitive Multiclass BoostingabstractCost-sensitive multiclass classification has recently acquired significance in several applications, through the introduction of multiclass datasets with well-defined misclassification costs. The design of classification algorithms for this setting is considered. It is argued that the unreliable performance of current algorithms is due to the inability of the underlying loss functions to enforce a certain fundamental underlying property. This property, denoted guess-aversion, is that the loss should encourage correct classifications over the arbitrary guessing that ensues when all classes are equally scored by the classifier. While guess-aversion holds trivially for binary classification, this is not true in the multiclass setting. A new family of cost-sensitive guess-averse loss functions is derived, and used to design new cost-sensitive multiclass boosting algorithms, denoted GEL- and GLL-MCBoost. Extensive experiments demonstrate (1) the general importance of guess-aversion and (2) that the GLL loss function outperforms other loss functions for multiclass boosting. Oscar Beijbom, Mohammad J. Saberian, David J. Kriegman, Nuno Vasconcelos |
ICML | 2 |
| 2014 | Multi-Resolution Cascades for Multiclass Object Detection
Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Boosting algorithms for detector cascade learning
Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2013 | Multiclass Semi-Supervised Boosting Using Similarity LearningabstractIn this paper, we consider the multiclass semi-supervised classification problem. A boosting algorithm is proposed to solve the multiclass problem directly. The proposed multiclass approach uses a new multiclass loss function, which includes two terms. The first term is the cost of the multiclass margin and the second term is a regularization term on unlabeled data. The regularization term is used to minimize the inconsistency between the pair wise similarity and the classifier predictions. It assigns the soft labels weighted with the similarity between unlabeled and labeled examples. We then derive a boosting algorithm, named CD-MSSBoost, from the proposed loss function using coordinate gradient descent. The derived algorithm is further used for learning optimal similarity function for a given data. Our experiments on a number of UCI datasets show that CD-MSSBoost outperforms the state-of-the-art methods to multiclass semi-supervised learning. Jafar Tanha, Mohammad J. Saberian, Maarten van Someren |
ICDM | 2 |
| 2012 | Boosting algorithms for simultaneous feature extraction and selectionabstractThe problem of simultaneous feature extraction and selection, for classifier design, is considered. A new framework is proposed, based on boosting algorithms that can either 1) select existing features or 2) assemble a combination of these features. This framework is simple and mathematically sound, derived from the statistical view of boosting and Taylor series approximations in functional space. Unlike classical boosting, which is limited to linear feature combinations, the new algorithms support more sophisticated combinations of weak learners, such as “sums of products” or “products of sums”. This is shown to enable the design of fairly complex predictor structures with few weak learners in a fully automated manner, leading to faster and more accurate classifiers, based on more informative features. Extensive experiments on synthetic data, UCI datasets, object detection and scene recognition show that these predictors consistently lead to more accurate classifiers than classical boosting algorithms. Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Learning Optimal Embedded CascadesabstractThe problem of automatic and optimal design of embedded object detector cascades is considered. Two main challenges are identified: optimization of the cascade configuration and optimization of individual cascade stages, so as to achieve the best tradeoff between classification accuracy and speed, under a detection rate constraint. Two novel boosting algorithms are proposed to address these problems. The first, RCBoost, formulates boosting as a constrained optimization problem which is solved with a barrier penalty method. The constraint is the target detection rate, which is met at all iterations of the boosting process. This enables the design of embedded cascades of known configuration without extensive cross validation or heuristics. The second, ECBoost, searches over cascade configurations to achieve the optimal tradeoff between classification risk and speed. The two algorithms are combined into an overall boosting procedure, RCECBoost, which optimizes both the cascade configuration and its stages under a detection rate constraint, in a fully automated manner. Extensive experiments in face, car, pedestrian, and panda detection show that the resulting detectors achieve an accuracy versus speed tradeoff superior to those of previous methods. Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2011 | TaylorBoost: First and second-order boosting algorithms with explicit margin controlabstractA new family of boosting algorithms, denoted Taylor-Boost, is proposed. It supports any combination of loss function and first or second order optimization, and includes classical algorithms such as AdaBoost, Gradient-Boost, or LogitBoost as special cases. Its restriction to the set of canonical losses makes it possible to have boosting algorithms with explicit margin control. A new large family of losses with this property, based on the set of cumulative distributions of zero mean random variables, is then proposed. A novel loss function in this family, the Laplace loss, is finally derived. The combination of this loss and second order TaylorBoost produces a boosting algorithm with explicit margin control. Mohammad J. Saberian, Hamed Masnadi-Shirazi, Nuno Vasconcelos |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2011 | Multiclass Boosting: Theory and AlgorithmsabstractThe problem of multiclass boosting is considered. A new framework,based on multi-dimensional codewords and predictors is introduced. The optimal set of codewords is derived, and a margin enforcing loss proposed. The resulting risk is minimized by gradient descent on a multidimensional functional space. Two algorithms are proposed: 1) CD-MCBoost, based on coordinate descent, updates one predictor component at a time, 2) GD-MCBoost, based on gradient descent, updates all components jointly. The algorithms differ in the weak learners that they support but are both shown to be 1) Bayes consistent, 2) margin enforcing, and 3) convergent to the global minimum of the risk. They also reduce to AdaBoost when there are only two classes. Experiments show that both methods outperform previous multiclass boosting approaches on a number of datasets. Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2010 | Boosting Classifier CascadesabstractThe problem of optimal and automatic design of a detector cascade is considered. A novel mathematical model is introduced for a cascaded detector. This model is analytically tractable, leads to recursive computation, and accounts for both classification and complexity. A boosting algorithm, FCBoost, is proposed for fully automated cascade design. It exploits the new cascade model, minimizes a Lagrangian cost that accounts for both classification risk and complexity. It searches the space of cascade configurations to automatically determine the optimal number of stages and their predictors, and is compatible with bootstrapping of negative examples and cost sensitive learning. Experiments show that the resulting cascades have state-of-the-art performance in various computer vision problems. Mohammad J. Saberian, Nuno Vasconcelos |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2009 | Robust Audio Data Hiding Using Correlated Quantization With Histogram-Based DetectorabstractIn this paper, two blind audio watermarking methods using correlated quantization for data embedding with histogram-based detector have been proposed. First, a novel mapping called the point-to-point graph (PPG) is introduced. In this mapping, the value of samples is important as well as the correlation among them. As this mapping increases the dimension of the signal, the data embedding procedure (quantization) will be diversified more securely than that of the 1-D domains such as the time or frequency domains. Hence, two watermarking techniques coined as hard and soft quantization methods based on the quantization of the PPG point radii are suggested. The performance of both techniques is analyzed by obtaining the radii distribution of PPG points after watermarking. Experimental results against AWGN attack confirm the validity of theoretical analysis. Moreover, the robustness of the proposed methods against other common attacks such as echo, low pass, resampling, and MP3 are investigated through extensive simulations. Mohammad Ali Akhaee, Mohammad J. Saberian, Soheil Feizi, Farrokh Marvasti |
IEEE Trans. Multim. | 2 |
| 2008 | An invertible quantization based watermarking approachabstractIn this paper a new class of invertible watermarking approach based on quantization has been introduced. Based on the necessary conditions (blindness, reversibility and imperceptibility), a set of linear convex functions which satisfy these requirements are found. Then the optimum of this function set with the least distortion has been selected. The main advantage of this method is that the inserted distortion can be easily controlled by adjusting quantization levels. The low computational complexity is another advantage of this method. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm achieves higher embedding capacity while its distortion is lower than other invertible watermarking techniques. Mohammad J. Saberian, Mohammad Ali Akhaee, Farrokh Marvasti |
ICASSP | 1 |