Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roy Anati
dblp:67/10432
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 82% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% Image recognition and object detection · 6% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › probabilistic localization
monte carlo localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
robot localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › map-based localization
semantic map-based localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
loop closure detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
topological mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
soft object detection · 0.1particle filtering · 0.1markov random field · 0.1loopy belief propagation · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Robot localization using soft object detectionabstractIn this paper, we give a new double twist to the robot localization problem. We solve the problem for the case of prior maps which are semantically annotated perhaps even sketched by hand. Data association is achieved not through the detection of visual features but the detection of object classes used in the annotation of the prior maps. To avoid the caveats of general object recognition, we propose a new representation of the query images that consists of a vector of the detection scores for each object class. Given such soft object detections we are able to create hypotheses about pose and to refine them through particle filtering. As opposed to small confined office and kitchen spaces, our experiment takes place in a large open urban rail station with multiple semantically ambiguous places. The success of our approach shows that our new representation is a robust way to exploit the plethora of existing prior maps for GPS-denied environments avoiding the data association problems when matching point clouds or visual features. Roy Anati, Davide Scaramuzza 0001, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Kostas Daniilidis |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2009 | Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure DetectionabstractWe present a system which constructs a topological map of an environment given a sequence of images. This system includes a novel image similarity score which uses dynamic programming to match images using both the appearance and relative positions of local features simultaneously. Additionally an MRF is constructed to model the probability of loop-closures. A locally optimal labeling is found using Loopy-BP. Finally we outline a method to generate a topological map from loop closure data. Results are presented on four urban sequences and one indoor sequence. Roy Anati, Kostas Daniilidis |
NIPS | 1 |