Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roy Anati

dblp:67/10432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 82% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 12% Image recognition and object detection · 6%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › probabilistic localization
monte carlo localization
0.112012
Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
robot localization
0.112012
Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › map-based localization
semantic map-based localization
0.112012
Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
loop closure detection
0.112009
Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.112009
Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
topological mapping
0.112009
Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection · NIPS 2009
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.012012
Robot localization using soft object detection · ICRA 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft object detection · 0.1particle filtering · 0.1markov random field · 0.1loopy belief propagation · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Robot localization using soft object detection
abstract
In this paper, we give a new double twist to the robot localization problem. We solve the problem for the case of prior maps which are semantically annotated perhaps even sketched by hand. Data association is achieved not through the detection of visual features but the detection of object classes used in the annotation of the prior maps. To avoid the caveats of general object recognition, we propose a new representation of the query images that consists of a vector of the detection scores for each object class. Given such soft object detections we are able to create hypotheses about pose and to refine them through particle filtering. As opposed to small confined office and kitchen spaces, our experiment takes place in a large open urban rail station with multiple semantically ambiguous places. The success of our approach shows that our new representation is a robust way to exploit the plethora of existing prior maps for GPS-denied environments avoiding the data association problems when matching point clouds or visual features.
Roy Anati, Davide Scaramuzza 0001, Konstantinos G. Derpanis, Kostas Daniilidis
ICRA1
2009 Constructing Topological Maps using Markov Random Fields and Loop-Closure Detection
abstract
We present a system which constructs a topological map of an environment given a sequence of images. This system includes a novel image similarity score which uses dynamic programming to match images using both the appearance and relative positions of local features simultaneously. Additionally an MRF is constructed to model the probability of loop-closures. A locally optimal labeling is found using Loopy-BP. Finally we outline a method to generate a topological map from loop closure data. Results are presented on four urban sequences and one indoor sequence.
Roy Anati, Kostas Daniilidis
NIPS1