Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fred Blau

dblp:67/1426 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 67% Program verification · 33%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
compiler correctness
0.012000
A certifying compiler for Java · PLDI 2000
Program verification
proof-carrying code
0.012000
A certifying compiler for Java · PLDI 2000
Compilers and program optimization
verified compilation
0.012000
A certifying compiler for Java · PLDI 2000
Systems and software security
memory safety
0.012000
A certifying compiler for Java · PLDI 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

type inference · 0.1proof checking · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 A certifying compiler for Java
abstract
This paper presents the initial results of a project to determine if the techniques of proof-carrying code and certifying compilers can be applied to programming languages of realistic size and complexity. The experiment shows that: (1) it is possible to implement a certifying native-code compiler for a large subset of the Java programming language; (2) the compiler is freely able to apply many standard local and global optimizations; and (3) the PCC binaries it produces are of reasonable size and can be rapidly checked for type safety by a small proof-checker. This paper also presents further evidence that PCC provides several advantages for compiler development. In particular, generating proofs of the target code helps to identify compiler bugs, many of which would have been dicult to discover by testing.
Christopher Colby, Peter Lee 0001, George C. Necula, Fred Blau, Mark Plesko, Kenneth Cline
PLDI4