Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yajuan Lü

dblp:67/2247 · also Yajuan Lv · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
22ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 21 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
13 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 45% Machine translation · 35% Language models and text generation · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 72% Data mining · 28%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
image-text retrieval
0.512021
Improving Video Retrieval by Adaptive Margin · SIGIR 2021
Data mining
representation learning
0.512021
Improving Video Retrieval by Adaptive Margin · SIGIR 2021
Information retrieval › multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.512021
Improving Video Retrieval by Adaptive Margin · SIGIR 2021
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
syntax-based machine translation
0.432013
Translation with Source Constituency and Dependency Trees · EMNLP 2013
Adjoining Tree-to-String Translation · ACL 2011
Improving Tree-to-Tree Translation with Packed Forests · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.322013
Discriminative Learning with Natural Annotations: Word Segmentation as a Case Study · ACL (1) 2013
Iterative Annotation Transformation with Predict-Self Reestimation for Chinese Word Segmentation · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Information retrieval › text analysis › text segmentation
topic segmentation
0.312017
Learning to Rank Semantic Coherence for Topic Segmentation · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
chinese word segmentation
0.222012
Iterative Annotation Transformation with Predict-Self Reestimation for Chinese Word Segmentation · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
A Cascaded Linear Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Part-of-Speech Tagging · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.222013
Bilingually-Guided Monolingual Dependency Grammar Induction · ACL (1) 2013
Collocation Translation Acquisition Using Monolingual Corpora · ACL 2004
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.222009
Lattice-based System Combination for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2009
Improving Statistical Machine Translation Performance by Training Data Selection and Optimization · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training
0.212013
Discriminative Learning with Natural Annotations: Word Segmentation as a Case Study · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
document-level machine translation
0.212013
Modeling Lexical Cohesion for Document-Level Machine Translation · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
grammar induction
0.212013
Bilingually-Guided Monolingual Dependency Grammar Induction · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse coherence
lexical cohesion
0.212013
Modeling Lexical Cohesion for Document-Level Machine Translation · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › unsupervised domain adaptation
self-training
0.112012
Iterative Annotation Transformation with Predict-Self Reestimation for Chinese Word Segmentation · EMNLP-CoNLL 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
constituency parsing
0.112011
Relaxed Cross-lingual Projection of Constituent Syntax · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112011
Relaxed Cross-lingual Projection of Constituent Syntax · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › syntax-based machine translation
tree-to-string translation
0.112011
Adjoining Tree-to-String Translation · ACL 2011
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
system combination
0.112009
Lattice-based System Combination for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › syntax-based machine translation
tree-to-tree translation
0.112009
Improving Tree-to-Tree Translation with Packed Forests · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.112008
A Cascaded Linear Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Part-of-Speech Tagging · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.112008
A Cascaded Linear Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Part-of-Speech Tagging · ACL 2008
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection
0.112007
Improving Statistical Machine Translation Performance by Training Data Selection and Optimization · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
discourse modeling
0.012013
Modeling Lexical Cohesion for Document-Level Machine Translation · IJCAI 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP › cross-lingual NLP
cross-lingual entity alignment
0.012004
A New Approach for English-Chinese Named Entity Alignment · EMNLP 2004
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.012004
A New Approach for English-Chinese Named Entity Alignment · EMNLP 2004
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
cross-lingual projection
0.012011
Relaxed Cross-lingual Projection of Constituent Syntax · EMNLP 2011
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.012011
Relaxed Cross-lingual Projection of Constituent Syntax · EMNLP 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-distillation · 0.5adaptive margin · 0.5symmetric CNN · 0.3learning to rank · 0.3natural annotations · 0.2hierarchical phrase-based translation · 0.2discriminative learning · 0.2bilingual guidance · 0.2predict-self reestimation · 0.1iterative annotation transformation · 0.1tree adjoining grammar · 0.1cross-lingual projection · 0.1packed forest decoding · 0.1lattice decoding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Improving Video Retrieval by Adaptive Margin
abstract
Video retrieval is becoming increasingly important owing to the rapid emergence of videos on the Internet. The dominant paradigm for video retrieval learns video-text representations by pushing the distance between the similarity of positive pairs and that of negative pairs apart from a fixed margin. However, negative pairs used for training are sampled randomly, which indicates that the semantics between negative pairs may be related or even equivalent, while most methods still enforce dissimilar representations to decrease their similarity. This phenomenon leads to inaccurate supervision and poor performance in learning video-text representations. While most video retrieval methods overlook that phenomenon, we propose an adaptive margin changed with the distance between positive and negative pairs to solve the aforementioned issue. First, we design the calculation framework of the adaptive margin, including the method of distance measurement and the function between the distance and the margin. Then, we explore a novel implementation called "Cross-Modal Generalized Self-Distillation" (CMGSD), which can be built on the top of most video retrieval models with few modifications. Notably, CMGSD adds few computational overheads at train time and adds no computational overhead at test time. Experimental results on three widely used datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can yield significantly better performance than the corresponding backbone model, and it outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
Zhifan Feng, Wenbin Jiang 0002, Yajuan Lü, Yong Zhu 0004, Xiao Tan 0001
SIGIR5
2017 Learning to Rank Semantic Coherence for Topic Segmentation
abstract
Topic segmentation plays an important role for discourse parsing and information retrieval.Due to the absence of training data, previous work mainly adopts unsupervised methods to rank semantic coherence between paragraphs for topic segmentation.In this paper, we present an intuitive and simple idea to automatically create a "quasi" training dataset, which includes a large amount of text pairs from the same or different documents with different semantic coherence.With the training corpus, we design a symmetric CNN neural network to model text pairs and rank the semantic coherence within the learning to rank framework.Experiments show that our algorithm is able to achieve competitive performance over strong baselines on several real-world datasets.
Liang Wang 0046, Sujian Li, Yajuan Lü, Houfeng Wang
EMNLP3
2015 Automatic Adaptation of Annotations
abstract
Manually annotated corpora are indispensable resources, yet for many annotation tasks, such as the creation of treebanks, there exist multiple corpora with different and incompatible annotation guidelines. This leads to an inefficient use of human expertise, but it could be remedied by integrating knowledge across corpora with different annotation guidelines. In this article we describe the problem of annotation adaptation and the intrinsic principles of the solutions, and present a series of successively enhanced models that can automatically adapt the divergence between different annotation formats. We evaluate our algorithms on the tasks of Chinese word segmentation and dependency parsing. For word segmentation, where there are no universal segmentation guidelines because of the lack of morphology in Chinese, we perform annotation adaptation from the much larger People's Daily corpus to the smaller but more popular Penn Chinese Treebank. For dependency parsing, we perform annotation adaptation from the Penn Chinese Treebank to a semantics-oriented Dependency Treebank, which is annotated using significantly different annotation guidelines. In both experiments, automatic annotation adaptation brings significant improvement, achieving state-of-the-art performance despite the use of purely local features in training.
Wenbin Jiang 0002, Yajuan Lü, Liang Huang 0001, Qun Liu 0001
Comput. Linguistics2
2013 Discriminative Learning with Natural Annotations: Word Segmentation as a Case Study
Wenbin Jiang 0002, Yajuan Lü, Yating Yang, Qun Liu 0001
ACL (1)3
2013 Bilingually-Guided Monolingual Dependency Grammar Induction
Yajuan Lü, Wenbin Jiang 0002, Qun Liu 0001
ACL (1)2
2013 Translation with Source Constituency and Dependency Trees
abstract
We present a novel translation model, which simultaneously exploits the constituency and dependency trees on the source side, to combine the advantages of two types of trees.We take head-dependents relations of dependency trees as backbone and incorporate phrasal nodes of constituency trees as the source side of our translation rules, and the target side as strings.Our rules hold the property of long distance reorderings and the compatibility with phrases.Large-scale experimental results show that our model achieves significantly improvements over the constituency-to-string (+2.45 BLEU on average) and dependencyto-string (+0.91 BLEU on average) models, which only employ single type of trees, and significantly outperforms the state-of-theart hierarchical phrase-based model (+1.12BLEU on average), on three Chinese-English NIST test sets.
Fandong Meng, Linfeng Song, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
EMNLP4
2013 Modeling Lexical Cohesion for Document-Level Machine Translation
Deyi Xiong, Guosheng Ben, Min Zhang 0005, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
IJCAI4
2013 A Topic-Triggered Language Model for Statistical Machine Translation
Heng Yu 0006, Jinsong Su, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
IJCNLP3
2013 A Simple, Fast Strategy for Weighted Alignment Hypergraph
Zhaopeng Tu, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
NLPCC3
2012 Iterative Annotation Transformation with Predict-Self Reestimation for Chinese Word Segmentation
Wenbin Jiang 0002, Fandong Meng, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü
EMNLP-CoNLL4
2011 Adjoining Tree-to-String Translation
Yang Liu 0005, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü
ACL3
2011 Relaxed Cross-lingual Projection of Constituent Syntax
Wenbin Jiang 0002, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü
EMNLP3
2011 Bagging-based System Combination for Domain Adaption
Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
MTSummit3
2011 Multi-granularity Word Alignment and Decoding for Agglutinative Language Translation
Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
MTSummit2
2009 Improving Tree-to-Tree Translation with Packed Forests
Yang Liu 0005, Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
ACL/IJCNLP2
2009 Lattice-based System Combination for Statistical Machine Translation
Yang Feng 0004, Yang Liu 0005, Haitao Mi, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü
EMNLP5
2009 Introduction to China's CWMT2008 Machine Translation Evaluation
Hongmei Zhao, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü, Dongdong Zhang 0001, Mu Li 0001
MTSummit4
2008 A Cascaded Linear Model for Joint Chinese Word Segmentation and Part-of-Speech Tagging
Wenbin Jiang 0002, Liang Huang 0001, Qun Liu 0001, Yajuan Lü
ACL4
2007 Improving Statistical Machine Translation Performance by Training Data Selection and Optimization
Yajuan Lü, Qun Liu 0001
EMNLP-CoNLL1
2004 Collocation Translation Acquisition Using Monolingual Corpora
abstract
Collocation translation is important for machine translation and many other NLP tasks. Unlike previous methods using bilingual parallel corpora, this paper presents a new method for acquiring collocation translations by making use of monolingual corpora and linguistic knowledge. First, dependency triples are extracted from Chinese and English corpora with dependency parsers. Then, a dependency triple translation model is estimated using the EM algorithm based on a dependency correspondence assumption. The generated triple translation model is used to extract collocation translations from two monolingual corpora. Experiments show that our approach outperforms the existing monolingual corpus based methods in dependency triple translation and achieves promising results in collocation translation extraction.
Yajuan Lü, Ming Zhou 0001
ACL1
2004 A New Approach for English-Chinese Named Entity Alignment
Donghui Feng 0001, Yajuan Lü, Ming Zhou 0001
EMNLP2
2002 Learning Chinese Bracketing Knowledge Based on a Bilingual Language Model
Yajuan Lü, Sheng Li 0003, Tiejun Zhao, Muyun Yang
COLING1